RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


subfever -> RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (4/26/2011 10:28:50 PM)

Okay, let me spell it out for you. You wrote:

It takes a complete package of taxing and cutting to get this mess under control. Something I have YET hear any politician state.

To which my reply included:

What can we expect politicians to publicly state, besides more lies? They sure the hell can't tell the truth. If they did, there would be mass chaos in the streets. But it's a safe bet that they will do everything possible to retain their power and control, regardless of what the consequences are for the masses.

Then I included comments to the general board, which I assumed most people would understand that "you guys" and "you folks" are plural, and wouldn't apply to one specific person.

If you are this sensitive, I'll be very careful that if I respond to your posts again, that I either respond solely to you and exclude everyone else, or type FR and include responses to you.




tazzygirl -> RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (4/26/2011 10:30:12 PM)

I prefer you dont respond to my posts if you cant make your postings any clearer than the mud you are trying to defend.




subfever -> RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (4/26/2011 10:30:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

But don't let me interfere with you folks playing in the partisian sandbox,




No worries [:D]




LOL! ... Back to our regularly scheduled program? ... [;)]




TheHeretic -> RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (4/26/2011 10:33:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever
Back to our regularly scheduled program? ... [;)]


Enjoy, but I'm calling it an evening.




subfever -> RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (4/26/2011 10:35:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I prefer you dont respond to my posts if you cant make your postings any clearer than the mud you are trying to defend.


I think my postings are clear to most... but I'll avoid your posts nevertheless.




subfever -> RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (4/26/2011 10:37:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever
Back to our regularly scheduled program? ... [;)]


Enjoy, but I'm calling it an evening.



Sounds like a particularly good idea, especially being two hours later here than there!




Owner59 -> RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (4/26/2011 10:39:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Must all you losers speak in cryptics?



Your namecalling only makes my point all the clearer, O59.

If it's too deep for you out here, maybe you can get a tax credit for some water wings?


Well,you did lose the last election and can`t seem to reconcile it,still.

That`s the reason for saying his term has cost the country without saying how.That would make you a sore loser with nothing to say.

As well as the whiny, cry-baby pot-kettle-black crap about the politics of personal destruction.Your GOP owns that shit.Add shameless hypocrite(is there any other type?)[:D]

You can only wish your party could produce a class act like President Obama.





thishereboi -> RE: RON PAUL: HE'S IN! (4/27/2011 4:27:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl

Medicaid fraud shouldn't be prosecuted until the federal poverty guidelines are changed because if they go after the companies, they'll go after the families too. Couples don't deserve to be prosecuted for medicaid fraud because of marriage or in some states even co-habitation. I seriously doubt rich people are going to move to countries where speaking their minds can get them locked up and suicide bombings are common. Why didn't they leave the country years ago when they were taxed at much higher rates?


Here is the site to report fraud and amazingly enough, it doesn't even address those people you are talking about. So tell me, what's the problem with this again?

http://www.atg.wa.gov/MedicaidFraud/CommonTypes.aspx



http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20110216/LOCAL/302169941

http://www.totaldivorce.com/news/articles/finance/divorce-for-medical-care.aspx

I wish I was wrong.


And you think they caught her while they were going after companies? And you are ok with her stealing all the money from other people who may need it? Sorry, but I don't see the logic.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125