Proprietrix
Posts: 756
Joined: 7/15/2005 From: Ohio/West Virginia Status: offline
|
I wanted to post this reply yesterday, but once I had it all typed, I "timed out". I'll try to word it as well as I had it worded yesterday, but keep in mind, I'm working off a small amount of coffee. :P It seems to me the distinction here is becoming more focused. Dominants who say "It's all about me." + who are single, and complain about being single, and have snotty attitudes, and are looking for a relationship where there's love, affection, intimacy, D/s involved, and don't plan to micro-manage, and expect submissives not in their collar to agree it's "All about the Dominant.", and are abrasive, rude and obnoxious..... (In which case, it doesn’t apply to me personally because there are many of those criteria I don’t meet.) And I'm guessing the key point for you darq, is this line: expect submissives not in their collar to agree it's "All about the Dominant." And in that aspect, we agree. When I say "It's all about me", I'm talking to the person who is considering being in my collar. I don't expect Tammyjo's Fox to think "It's all about Miss P." I expect him to think "It's all about Tammyjo." I don't expect Ironbear's slaves to think it's all about Miss P. I expect them to think it's all about Ironbear. I don't expect darq to think it's all about Miss P. Until darq is in her Owner's collar, I expect darq to think it's all about whatever she wants it to be about. However, I do expect the boy/girl who is begging for my collar, or trying to woo me, to think "It's all about Miss P." because once I clasp that lock around his/her throat, that is indeed what it's all about - for him or her. And some of it, I believe, is just different views on the lifestyle. Take a couple of casual play partners. They get together twice a year at the dungeon to play. It’s mostly physical, S&M aspects of WIITWD. If the Top walked around saying "It’s all about me." S/he might come off as arrogant, and the bottom might respond "No. For 40 minutes twice a year, it’s a little bit about you, but mainly it’s about my enjoyment of being flogged." Now, on the other side of the coin, take a Master/slave 24/7 relationship, based on the concept of no-limits, high protocol, and TPE. Master is seeking a second slave that meets the standards of the relationship. He might very well, in his search, say quite often "It’s all about me." and potential slaves looking for that type of relationship might drool at the thought of someday being in this strong confident man’s collar. Same words. Different situations. The statement "It's all about me" isn't an affront to the population of single submissives, it's more a way of conveying one's personal beliefs for what is expected in their personal power exchange relationships. It's no different than someone saying "My collar will be respected." It's not so much aimed at the population at large as a demand for each and every individual to respect their collar, as it's aimed at their potential slaves. And part of it I think, is just semantics. When a Dominant says "It's all about me." The "it" they are referring to can have many meanings. It (the relationship), It (the power exchange), It (the fulfillment of pleasure), It (the level of protocol). And the "me" can have different meanings. Me (My pleasure), Me (My desires), Me (My system of equality or lack thereof), Me (My rules). So they could mean anything from "This relationship is all about my pleasure." to "Our power exchange is all about my authority." I don't know for sure, but I doubt there's any Dominants out there who are saying "It's all about me", but really mean "submissives of the world don't have the right to eat and use the bathroom unless they consult with me first." jali made the comment "In a really arrogant "all about me" dominant person, they can be fiercely protective of their submissve/slave....because life is about *them* and *their* slave becomes part of that world so becomes captured and secured in that dominant persons kingdom." I really liked this point, and I think it goes back to semantics. If it's all about me, it's also all about my belongings, and my slaves are part of my belongings, so in a sense, when I say It's all about me, by default, it's all about them also.
_____________________________
IMO, IMHO, YMMV, AFAIK, to me, I see it as, from my perspective, it's been my experience, I only speak for myself, (and all other disclaimers here).
|