RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics

RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 2:43:39 PM)
If you look at who posted the most, you will understand

Real0ne -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 4:55:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen RO you're lying. The Davidians themselves admit that the shooting was from their own side. Everyone killed during the final asault was killed by the Davidians. Go read the court testimony of the Davidians. yeh after they were shot at. koresh opened the door unarmed and was shot through the front door. Koresh's top aide killed Koresh and then killed himself after setting the fire. Koresh's body was nowhere near the front door. If you're going to make shit up at least make up shit not refuted by the very same infrared video's you were touting up thread. if you got it post it otherwise I dont want to hear. I seen enough of your red herrings to know better than to take ANYTHING you post at face value and the only way to sort it out is to look at what you "think" you got. so lets see it because that is not what I have found..

Politesub53 -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:11:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rule FR It is interesting that lickenforyou and RO are both subs, but that lickenforyou does not perceive the truth, whereas RO does. I wonder why that is. Does it perchance correlate to lickenforyou being a narcissist and RO - at least in my perception so far - not being a narcissist? Its interesting that you and RO are both arseholes. Neither of you would know the truth if it slapped you in the face. I wonder why that is ? Does it perchance correlate to you being a supergenius, while RO - At least in my perception so far - is totally stupid.

jlf1961 -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:16:00 PM)
politesub, in the future it may ease your intestinal discomfort associated with posts by Rule and RO if you put them both on ignore. I did and I have not regretted it. Considering that rule is anti-Semitic, and RO openly supports anti-government extremists that have killed law enforcement officers, it is just better.

Politesub53 -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:17:38 PM)
They are both part of the light entertainment channel JLF. [;)]

Rule -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:31:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Its interesting that you and RO are both arseholes. Neither of you would know the truth if it slapped you in the face. I wonder why that is ? Does it perchance correlate to you being a supergenius, while RO - At least in my perception so far - is totally stupid. I thank you for this your post as it is revealing and informative. It does establish that you are a rude - not a polite - sub. Thus you definitely do lack grace. (Conforming to type: there are more rude subs.) As for your second sentence: you are wrong. I recommend that you do not feel bad about that. As for your third sentence: I recommend that you do not wonder. If past history - your second sentence - is an indication of future efforts, the prediction must be that you will always be wrong, so wondering will be counterproductive for you. As for your last sentence: Me being a super-genius, I am far more capable of determining RO's comprehensive abilities than you are. His are higher than average. (From my perspective yours are zero; I recommend that you do not feel bad about that either.)

Rule -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:34:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Considering that rule is anti-Semitic Please abstain from your mud-throwing. I am not anti-semitic. Nobody can quote any post made by me that is anti-semitic.

Real0ne -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:43:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Rule FR It is interesting that lickenforyou and RO are both subs, but that lickenforyou does not perceive the truth, whereas RO does. I wonder why that is. Does it perchance correlate to lickenforyou being a narcissist and RO - at least in my perception so far - not being a narcissist? Its interesting that you and RO are both arseholes. Neither of you would know the truth if it slapped you in the face. I wonder why that is ? Does it perchance correlate to you being a supergenius, while RO - At least in my perception so far - is totally stupid. Wow thanks the heavens we have you to tell us the the truth! ok whats the truth man spit it out! I and so fucking excited I dont have any more finger nails left.

Politesub53 -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:44:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rule quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Considering that rule is anti-Semitic Please abstain from your mud-throwing. I am not anti-semitic. Nobody can quote any post made by me that is anti-semitic. You did say that the rich Jews killed the poor Jews though. As for your views of me, they dont matter so much Mister Supergenius. I have long since viewed you as being a plank short of a full load.

Real0ne -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:50:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 politesub, in the future it may ease your intestinal discomfort associated with posts by Rule and RO if you put them both on ignore. I did and I have not regretted it. Considering that rule is anti-Semitic, and RO openly supports anti-government extremists that have killed law enforcement officers, it is just better. for someone who has me on ignore you sure seem to claim to know a lot and you cant even get that straight. What jlf is trying to say is that he has so many bloody [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stuff/fighting-230.gif[/image] noses that he had to put me on iggy wiggy because like now he just cant control himself!

Rule -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 5:56:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 You did say that the rich Jews killed the poor Jews though. Actually I stated that USA Jewish bankers purposely financed the murder of (poor) Jews when they financed Hitler. How is that an anti-semitic statement? Besides, the USA Jewish bankers did finance the murder of rich Jews also when they financed Hitler. quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 As for your views of me, they dont matter so much Mister Supergenius. That is quite okay. I never expected you to comprehend them anyway. (Do not feel bad about that inability, though.) quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 I have long since viewed you as being a plank short of a full load. Actually, being a super-genius, I am at least two planks short of the full load. I do not feel bad about that as it demonstrates that I am true to type; it is a package deal. [;)]

Rule -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/8/2011 6:06:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne What jlf is trying to say is that he has so many bloody [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stuff/fighting-230.gif[/image] noses that he had to put me on iggy wiggy because like now he just cant control himself! He is being true to type also. He squashes easily, doesn't he? He is always wide open. I found it amusing to learn that he boosts himself by the use of numerous sock-puppets.

DomKen -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/9/2011 11:18:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen RO you're lying. The Davidians themselves admit that the shooting was from their own side. Everyone killed during the final asault was killed by the Davidians. Go read the court testimony of the Davidians. yeh after they were shot at. koresh opened the door unarmed and was shot through the front door. Koresh's top aide killed Koresh and then killed himself after setting the fire. Koresh's body was nowhere near the front door. If you're going to make shit up at least make up shit not refuted by the very same infrared video's you were touting up thread. if you got it post it otherwise I dont want to hear. I seen enough of your red herrings to know better than to take ANYTHING you post at face value and the only way to sort it out is to look at what you "think" you got. so lets see it because that is not what I have found.. http://www.waco93.com/Danforth-finalreport.pdf

Real0ne -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/9/2011 3:22:13 PM)
ken I did not ask you for some bullshit gubbermint report. you said you had the court case and that is what I want. that pdf has shit redacted and its editable. oh yeh its bona-fide! sure it is! scan that court case and lets see it.

mnottertail -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/9/2011 3:30:04 PM)
Uh, the court case is a gub-a-mint doc-a-mint. So you are taken in by the fraud at the outset.

Real0ne -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/9/2011 3:33:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Uh, the court case is a gub-a-mint doc-a-mint. So you are taken in by the fraud at the outset. yeh but the statements on the transcript are at least reasonably close to what was said presumably though they do occasionally purposely leave shit out or accidentally hear something that was not said. gottsta luv the guv when it comes to fraud they got the bases covered.

DomKen -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/9/2011 4:44:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Uh, the court case is a gub-a-mint doc-a-mint. So you are taken in by the fraud at the outset. yeh but the statements on the transcript are at least reasonably close to what was said presumably though they do occasionally purposely leave shit out or accidentally hear something that was not said. gottsta luv the guv when it comes to fraud they got the bases covered. You'll have to subscribe to Lexis to get the transcript or you can go down to Texas and get it from the Clerk.

Real0ne -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/9/2011 5:02:53 PM)
Oh NM NB I thought you said you read it.

DomKen -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/10/2011 5:12:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne Oh NM NB I thought you said you read it. I read the testimony of a couple of the witnesses, that are referenced in the Danbury report, but I subscribed to Lexis back then.

Real0ne -> RE: Bin Laden death reignites debate over CIA tactics (5/10/2011 7:47:33 AM)
Well then I guess we will put that one on the back burner and agree to disagree until I confirm it at my leisure.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0546875