Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 12:59:28 PM   
zenny


Posts: 275
Joined: 2/13/2008
Status: offline
And yet crimes are at or close to all time highs in countries that have done that. Go figure!

Great idea!

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 1:08:40 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Proof please



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 2:02:14 PM   
outhere69


Posts: 1302
Joined: 1/25/2011
Status: offline
The FBI doesn't keep such statistics.

Time magazine did a feature on the 464 gun deaths in 1 week in the US, back in 1989.  It showed that some of the stories published about guns preventing a crime are misleading, and some data out of King County (WA) showing that for each defensible, justifiable homicide, there were 43 murders, suicides, and accidental deaths (in 1986).

The article made for a huge amount of debate, you can find Time's answer here:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,958392-1,00.html

It was interesting that the woman in the anecdote only survived because she'd unloaded the chamber.  Otherwise she would've been killed with her own gun.

Most women are attacked from the rear - I'd have to have a gun in my hand to do any good at all.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 2:20:40 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline

I think people have every right to own a firearm.

I think that any adult who owns a firearm and has children around, who does not teach them gun safety, should be beaten and not in a good way.

I think if you are an adult and you have firearms in a place that a child can get to, and that child is injured, or injures another, that you should go to jail for a while.

I think that if you are too fucking stupid to treat every weapon like it is a loaded weapon, and you shoot your self in the head, well, you are a moron. If you accidentally shoot someone else, you are a bigger moron. I have been around guns all my life, and if you are looking at one or cleaning one and you point the barrel at me, I will go psycholunchlady on your ass about it.

If I pull out a weapon, and I did not just say "hey wanna see this pistol i have", I am going to be shooting until it is empty.

What was the question?

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to outhere69)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 2:29:22 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

There's a really easy way to answer this, provide a link to the study. Surely the FBI has published this report.


I'd rather see proof  that he isn't this guy:
I can also tell you from my professional experience that individuals who run around talking about their wealth of experience with weapons  and constantly seem to engage in verbal aggression with those around them (one in this thread really stands out as a prime example) are the kind of people we'd routinely keep an eye on. Individuals like that fit a profile where the extrapolated behaviors include murder of family members, armed stand-offs, and even child molestation." - manathewheel

Heh... I'm just sitting here laughing my fucking ass off that Vin Douchel there kisses the ass of the guy who practically calls him Lee Harvey Oswald and John Wayne Gacy rolled into one


(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 4:45:30 PM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline
This thread is not offtopic anymore. It is now in Politics and Religion.

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.


(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 5:17:07 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

This is the same kind of nutty argument the NRA nuts make every time and every time they're pulled up by the vast weight of statistics which demonstrate:

A) Private firearms are more of a danger to yourself and your loved ones than anyone else.
B) Given the expectation of homeowners with firearms, criminals simply arm up themselves.
C) The resulting heavily-armed society is a violent one with simply enormous levels of gun violence.    Homicide due to firearms in the USA is roughly 85 per million population.   In New Zealand which has relatively liberal private gun ownership but places restrictions on military-style semi-automatics and focuses on vetting gun owners themselves rather than specific firearm classes, the homicide rate is 13 per million.

This means that we have less than 50 homicides per year, while the USA has 25,000-30,000.  And let's not forget the number of people in that list who take their lives with their own weapon.

Sorry gun crazies - this one example doesn't change the fact that more people die every year due to your obsession than are saved by it.  Nice try though.



whats this another fuckin brit trying to tell americans to ban arms and how to live?

quote:



Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia --- Crime Rate Plummets
tysk news ^ | 1997 | Baldwin
Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:29:03 PM by doug from upland Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia
Crime Rate Plummets by Chuck Baldwin

The New American magazine reminds us that March 25th marked the 16th anniversary of Kennesaw, Georgia's ordinance requiring heads of households (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes.

The city's population grew from around 5,000 in 1980 to 13,000 by 1996 (latest available estimate). Yet there have been only three murders: two with knives (1984 and 1987) and one with a firearm (1997). After the law went into effect in 1982, crime against persons plummeted 74 percent compared to 1981, and fell another 45 percent in 1983 compared to 1982.

And it has stayed impressively low. In addition to nearly non-existent homicide (murders have averaged a mere 0.19 per year), the annual number of armed robberies, residential burglaries, commercial burglaries, and rapes have averaged, respectively, 1.69, 31.63, 19.75, and 2.00 through 1998.

With all the attention that has been heaped upon the lawful possession of firearms lately, you would think that a city that requires gun ownership would be the center of a media feeding frenzy. It isn't. The fact is I can't remember a major media outlet even mentioning Kennesaw. Can you?

The reason is obvious. Kennesaw proves that the presence of firearms actually improves safety and security. This is not the message that the media want us to hear. They want us to believe that guns are evil and are the cause of violence.

The facts tell a different story. What is even more interesting about Kennesaw is that the city's crime rate decreased with the simple knowledge that the entire community was armed. The bad guys didn't force the residents to prove it. Just knowing that residents were armed prompted them to move on to easier targets. Most criminals don't have a death wish.

There have been two occasions in my own family when the presence of a handgun averted potential disaster. In both instances the gun was never aimed at a person and no shot was fired.



How does that saying go again?
Oh yeh... eat shit and bark at the moon!

YOu just better be nice because there are 300 million people in the US and 302 MILLION "known" arms in the hands of the public.  Thats more than the armys of the world combined.






< Message edited by Real0ne -- 5/15/2011 5:20:48 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 5:23:16 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

This is the same kind of nutty argument the NRA nuts make every time and every time they're pulled up by the vast weight of statistics which demonstrate:

A) Private firearms are more of a danger to yourself and your loved ones than anyone else.
B) Given the expectation of homeowners with firearms, criminals simply arm up themselves.
C) The resulting heavily-armed society is a violent one with simply enormous levels of gun violence.    Homicide due to firearms in the USA is roughly 85 per million population.   In New Zealand which has relatively liberal private gun ownership but places restrictions on military-style semi-automatics and focuses on vetting gun owners themselves rather than specific firearm classes, the homicide rate is 13 per million.

This means that we have less than 50 homicides per year, while the USA has 25,000-30,000.  And let's not forget the number of people in that list who take their lives with their own weapon.

Sorry gun crazies - this one example doesn't change the fact that more people die every year due to your obsession than are saved by it.  Nice try though.



whats this another fuckin brit trying to tell americans to ban arms and how to live?

quote:



Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia --- Crime Rate Plummets
tysk news ^ | 1997 | Baldwin
Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:29:03 PM by doug from upland Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia
Crime Rate Plummets by Chuck Baldwin

The New American magazine reminds us that March 25th marked the 16th anniversary of Kennesaw, Georgia's ordinance requiring heads of households (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes.

The city's population grew from around 5,000 in 1980 to 13,000 by 1996 (latest available estimate). Yet there have been only three murders: two with knives (1984 and 1987) and one with a firearm (1997). After the law went into effect in 1982, crime against persons plummeted 74 percent compared to 1981, and fell another 45 percent in 1983 compared to 1982.

And it has stayed impressively low. In addition to nearly non-existent homicide (murders have averaged a mere 0.19 per year), the annual number of armed robberies, residential burglaries, commercial burglaries, and rapes have averaged, respectively, 1.69, 31.63, 19.75, and 2.00 through 1998.

With all the attention that has been heaped upon the lawful possession of firearms lately, you would think that a city that requires gun ownership would be the center of a media feeding frenzy. It isn't. The fact is I can't remember a major media outlet even mentioning Kennesaw. Can you?

The reason is obvious. Kennesaw proves that the presence of firearms actually improves safety and security. This is not the message that the media want us to hear. They want us to believe that guns are evil and are the cause of violence.

The facts tell a different story. What is even more interesting about Kennesaw is that the city's crime rate decreased with the simple knowledge that the entire community was armed. The bad guys didn't force the residents to prove it. Just knowing that residents were armed prompted them to move on to easier targets. Most criminals don't have a death wish.

There have been two occasions in my own family when the presence of a handgun averted potential disaster. In both instances the gun was never aimed at a person and no shot was fired.



How does that saying go again?
Oh yeh... eat shit and bark at the moon!

YOu just better be nice because there are 300 million people in the US and 302 "known" arms in the hands of the public.  Thats more than the armys of the world combined.



Bravo, RealOne.  I don't often agree with you and I don't expect that to change, but you couldn't be more right about the deterring effect of private gun ownership on crime. 

And for those pusilanimous gun haters, it is a matter of historical record that the empire of Japan never even entertained a thought of a mainland invasion of the U.S. because the citizens were so well armed. 

If the Brits, who live in a country less than twice the size of Texas, want to be disarmed, want to live in a socialist caste system, want to boast about having more cameras watching their people than any other country in the world and want to have their energy monitored by a "smart grid", I say FUCK 'EM!  Yes, they are our cousins from across the pond but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't keep eating at the children's table over the holidays.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 7:08:39 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Given the expectation of homeowners with firearms, criminals simply arm up themselves.

This may surprise you, but criminals very much prefer not to risk getting shot or caught.

Tourism is a big industry in Florida, and back in the 90's the state had a problem. Tourists were being assaulted and robbed at an alarming rate, and the tourism industry was getting seriously nervous. This had to stop. But at first, nobody could figure out how the criminals were targeting the state's tourists with such uncanny accuracy.

Florida is a right-to-carry state, but much of our tourism is international. And the rate of assaults against foreign tourists was enough to make you wonder if they had little lights on their heads alerting criminals that here was a victim who would be unlikely to hold any nasty surprises.

Until, that is, the picture finally cleared. Most foreign tourists who come to Florida need to rent a car to get around. And in resort areas during the tourist season, it was an all but certain bet in those days that rental plates on a vehicle meant the driver was a foreign tourist and therefore unarmed. Bingo.

Florida immediately changed the law so that rental vehicles could no longer be distinguished by their license plates, and the rash of assaults stopped as if a faucet had been turned off. Doyle Jourdon, head of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement at the time, commented, "The bad guys are not stupid."

Too bad we can't say that about everyone.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 5/15/2011 7:12:46 PM >

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 7:13:01 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
Great post, Kirata.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 8:01:27 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

There have been two occasions in my own family when the presence of a handgun averted potential disaster. In both instances the gun was never aimed at a person and no shot was fired.


I have this mental image of one of the "hand models" from the price is right waving their hand across and S&W .357 and criminals diving out the livingroom window... colorful

YOu just better be nice because there are 300 million people in the US and 302 "known" arms in the hands of the public. Thats more than the armys of the world combined.

BFD

AND THIS ... THIS IS JUST LUDICROUS ....

And for those pusilanimous gun haters, it is a matter of historical record that the empire of Japan never even entertained a thought of a mainland invasion of the U.S. because the citizens were so well armed.

My father shortened his life in WW2 and I am just going to call you for what you are with this statement,  a bullshit artist. Every account I have ever heard indicated that the strong naval presence between the west coast and Hawaii made it logistically impossible for the Japanese to even consider making such a move. In 30 seconds I was able to locate MANY cites to back up what I am saying, where's yours????:

Let's ask wiki answers, they only have like a 99.9% accuracy rate/\...

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_did_Japan_not_invade_the_US

And Oh, look here's a bunch of people who are ACTUAL EXPERTS ON WW2, many of whom are are ACTUAL WW2 VETS... but what the fuck would they know? They just fought in the war and have first hand knoweledge by living on more than half a century after the conflict and studying it with great interest....

http://www.ww2incolor.com/forum/showthread.php?4617-What-was-the-danger-of-Japanese-invasion-of-the-USA-main-land

On yahoo Answers, the accepted answer not only addresses the japan invasion question but also extrpolates on your theory based on the MYTHIC Yamamoto 'gun behind every blade of grass' ... such a powerful statement ... too bad he didn't include it in his memoirs  and remains widely used BUT COMPLETELY UNSUBSTANTIATED...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101028070228AAVctPy


You want to tackle a real conspiracy? Perhaps you could find out who's at the root of these BS efforts to create a revisionist view of US history. That would be something I would be MOST impressed with.
  The nice thing about all of this BS you guys spread across the internet is that it has resulted in a number of very reliable groups working to verify as many of the facts about these neo-myths as possible.
    Here's my advice. Besides of course finding a Domme who can get herself past your unsightly appearance and beat some fucking sense into you, I would go to snopes.com with each of the internet chain letters and search on the so-called 'facts' you intend to spew. I guarantee you'll most often get some kind of proof of inaccuracy or verification of the absurd claim you want to make.
  EVENTUALLY.... SOMEDAY... you'll come up with something you can report with a vague element of truth... AND BOY, WON'T YOU BE PROUD.


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 8:14:02 PM   
DarqueMirror


Posts: 1262
Joined: 3/21/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50
True, none of them were shot dead, but....


...but that means they are freely able to go into someone else's home with knives and axe handles when they are released.

It's amusing to me how Aussies like to brag about their country's gun control laws while forgetting that when Australia initially banned guns, gun crime spiked long before it began to decrease. That means that for a time, gun-toting criminals had free reign, knowing they had no fear of armed opposition.

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 8:26:33 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
~FR

Is it just me or does the thought of banning guns for citizens leave a doorway of opportunity for criminals to do pretty much whatever they please... because, frankly, they arent too worried about the law to begin with.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DarqueMirror)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 8:27:32 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

I have this mental image of one of the "hand models" from the price is right



I really dont know anything about your army of strawmen in your post but I put this up for people like you, but I guess you still dont get it.



quote:



Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia --- Crime Rate Plummets
tysk news ^ | 1997 | Baldwin
Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:29:03 PM by doug from upland Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia
Crime Rate Plummets by Chuck Baldwin

The New American magazine reminds us that March 25th marked the 16th anniversary of Kennesaw, Georgia's ordinance requiring heads of households (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes.

The city's population grew from around 5,000 in 1980 to 13,000 by 1996 (latest available estimate). Yet there have been only three murders: two with knives (1984 and 1987) and one with a firearm (1997). After the law went into effect in 1982, crime against persons plummeted 74 percent compared to 1981, and fell another 45 percent in 1983 compared to 1982.

And it has stayed impressively low. In addition to nearly non-existent homicide (murders have averaged a mere 0.19 per year), the annual number of armed robberies, residential burglaries, commercial burglaries, and rapes have averaged, respectively, 1.69, 31.63, 19.75, and 2.00 through 1998.

With all the attention that has been heaped upon the lawful possession of firearms lately, you would think that a city that requires gun ownership would be the center of a media feeding frenzy. It isn't. The fact is I can't remember a major media outlet even mentioning Kennesaw. Can you?

The reason is obvious. Kennesaw proves that the presence of firearms actually improves safety and security. This is not the message that the media want us to hear. They want us to believe that guns are evil and are the cause of violence.

The facts tell a different story. What is even more interesting about Kennesaw is that the city's crime rate decreased with the simple knowledge that the entire community was armed. The bad guys didn't force the residents to prove it. Just knowing that residents were armed prompted them to move on to easier targets. Most criminals don't have a death wish.

There have been two occasions in my own family when the presence of a handgun averted potential disaster. In both instances the gun was never aimed at a person and no shot was fired.






< Message edited by Real0ne -- 5/15/2011 8:29:23 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 9:19:07 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I really don't know anything about your army of strawmen in your post but I put this up for people like you, but I guess you still dont get it.

Be sure to write back when you have something to say that even makes any fucking sense. I am assuming that by inappropriate use of the term 'strawmen' you mean your being confronted with facts below the quote you actually commented on.... I made the hand model reference in regard to the image your illustration of these ALLEGED two incident.
As far as the information provided below. Those are simply called documentation of the invalidity of your friend's claim. Sorry the truth is so hard to swallow.
    Like I said .... when you have something cogent to say, be sure to write back.


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 10:49:10 PM   
WyldHrt


Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I can tell you for a fact, that the Bureau is definitely not engaged in any 'studies' that produce data designed to promote private gun ownership.

Funny, most studies start with a theory, then data is gathered and analyzed, and only then is a conclusion reached. Seems to me that 'the Bureau' is doing things bass-ackwards if they definitely aren't engaged in studies that produce a specific conclusion.
quote:

By the way, if you would like the perspective of someone who ACTUALLY carries a gun and has had to discharge it several times in the span of his career[/snip]
Wow, I'm impressed. Some random guy on the internet claims to be a LEO with knowledge of the FBI's stat gathering methods and having had to discharge his weapon 'several times'. Thank goodness your hidden profile, been here 2 years, never posted before self just happened to stumble on this particular gun thread.

Is anyone missing a sock?


_____________________________

"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel
"We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop

Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore"
Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!

(in reply to manatthewheel)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 11:05:10 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
  No.  They're not.  It's just gun-obsessive propaganda.  Like when the NRA claimed that Australian restrictions on semi-automatics led to a violent crime wave.  It did nothing of the sort.  Those are just lies.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 11:05:39 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Isnt it amazing that all these unused accounts just pop up in the political forum on a BDSM site?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to WyldHrt)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 11:09:50 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
whats this another fuckin brit trying to tell americans to ban arms and how to live?
  What's this?  Another pussy-ass American who's too weak to even roll over in his sleep without a gun to make him feel like a man?  Big surprise.

quote:

YOu just better be nice because there are 300 million people in the US and 302 MILLION "known" arms in the hands of the public.  Thats more than the armys of the world combined.
  Yes and 12 men with a plan killed 3 and a half thousand of you.  Don't be so fucking stupid you gung-ho obsessive.  If might makes right, believe me, you're gonna be bending the knee to the Chinese.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner - 5/15/2011 11:15:06 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
  Kirata your example 100% supports exactly what I said.

Namely that easy access to weapons means an arms race between criminal and victim.  So much so, that anyone who enters your society who isn't carrying is subject to immediate disadvantage, danger and threat.

In other words, your society is inherently more violent and dangerous because of the easy access to weapons.  Whereas tourists from countries who don't have the same kind of gun obsession simply don't carry because they do not need to.

Yes, too bad we can't say that about everyone - because if we could, the illogic of a people trying to claim increased safety in the country which is clearly and demonstrably more dangerous would be obvious to everyone.  Sadly, the lust for the gun blinds people to simple logic.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094