lockedaway
Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness This is the same kind of nutty argument the NRA nuts make every time and every time they're pulled up by the vast weight of statistics which demonstrate: A) Private firearms are more of a danger to yourself and your loved ones than anyone else. B) Given the expectation of homeowners with firearms, criminals simply arm up themselves. C) The resulting heavily-armed society is a violent one with simply enormous levels of gun violence. Homicide due to firearms in the USA is roughly 85 per million population. In New Zealand which has relatively liberal private gun ownership but places restrictions on military-style semi-automatics and focuses on vetting gun owners themselves rather than specific firearm classes, the homicide rate is 13 per million. This means that we have less than 50 homicides per year, while the USA has 25,000-30,000. And let's not forget the number of people in that list who take their lives with their own weapon. Sorry gun crazies - this one example doesn't change the fact that more people die every year due to your obsession than are saved by it. Nice try though. whats this another fuckin brit trying to tell americans to ban arms and how to live? quote:
Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia --- Crime Rate Plummets tysk news ^ | 1997 | Baldwin Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:29:03 PM by doug from upland Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia Crime Rate Plummets by Chuck Baldwin The New American magazine reminds us that March 25th marked the 16th anniversary of Kennesaw, Georgia's ordinance requiring heads of households (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes. The city's population grew from around 5,000 in 1980 to 13,000 by 1996 (latest available estimate). Yet there have been only three murders: two with knives (1984 and 1987) and one with a firearm (1997). After the law went into effect in 1982, crime against persons plummeted 74 percent compared to 1981, and fell another 45 percent in 1983 compared to 1982. And it has stayed impressively low. In addition to nearly non-existent homicide (murders have averaged a mere 0.19 per year), the annual number of armed robberies, residential burglaries, commercial burglaries, and rapes have averaged, respectively, 1.69, 31.63, 19.75, and 2.00 through 1998. With all the attention that has been heaped upon the lawful possession of firearms lately, you would think that a city that requires gun ownership would be the center of a media feeding frenzy. It isn't. The fact is I can't remember a major media outlet even mentioning Kennesaw. Can you? The reason is obvious. Kennesaw proves that the presence of firearms actually improves safety and security. This is not the message that the media want us to hear. They want us to believe that guns are evil and are the cause of violence. The facts tell a different story. What is even more interesting about Kennesaw is that the city's crime rate decreased with the simple knowledge that the entire community was armed. The bad guys didn't force the residents to prove it. Just knowing that residents were armed prompted them to move on to easier targets. Most criminals don't have a death wish. There have been two occasions in my own family when the presence of a handgun averted potential disaster. In both instances the gun was never aimed at a person and no shot was fired. How does that saying go again? Oh yeh... eat shit and bark at the moon! YOu just better be nice because there are 300 million people in the US and 302 "known" arms in the hands of the public. Thats more than the armys of the world combined. Bravo, RealOne. I don't often agree with you and I don't expect that to change, but you couldn't be more right about the deterring effect of private gun ownership on crime. And for those pusilanimous gun haters, it is a matter of historical record that the empire of Japan never even entertained a thought of a mainland invasion of the U.S. because the citizens were so well armed. If the Brits, who live in a country less than twice the size of Texas, want to be disarmed, want to live in a socialist caste system, want to boast about having more cameras watching their people than any other country in the world and want to have their energy monitored by a "smart grid", I say FUCK 'EM! Yes, they are our cousins from across the pond but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't keep eating at the children's table over the holidays.
|