Slaves Fetishes (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


AcademyForSlaves -> Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 5:44:53 PM)

Hi.

I am curious, what are the most unusual bizarre fetishes a slave has asked you to cater to, and do you cater to a slave's fetish or is that a strict no-no in your rule books?

Personally I do not mind if a slave has fetishes, even if he worries they seem strange or bizarre, because I enjoy experimenting with fantasies, and as long as he serves Me the way I like then I do not mind rewarding him with what I know he likes.

What are your views on this subject?




Tantriqu -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 7:09:00 PM)

I never 'cater', including to wankthreads.
If it's something I'm interested in or find intriguing, great, but fetishism implies the dude will be absorbed in the act, and not care about the person delivering it.

If you're asking about hard limits as a Domme, things I'll never be involved in in any form include financial; 'forced' bi-; married men; switches; escalating masochism/permanent mutilation including castration and self-cannibalism; cross-dressing; race play; foot fetishism; diaper play; inescapable and permanent bondage, etc., i.e., the 'do-me' dudes.
I've been asked to do each and all, and I'm sure I've forgotten a few.
The 6'6" gorgeous blond Dane asking me to scarify him by whipping then refer to him by the n-word was the most disturbing one recently.





LadyPact -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 7:23:46 PM)

By the actual definition to the word, clip doesn't have any fetishes.  There are activities that sexually excite him, but I don't see those as fetishes, as just something that turns someone on doesn't satisfy the requirements to be a fetish.

As for catering to anyone, I don't do that. 




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 7:38:18 PM)

I dont "cater" to anyone. I wouldn't be with someone whose interests didn't (mostly) match mine.




littlewonder -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 8:03:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

By the actual definition to the word, clip doesn't have any fetishes.  There are activities that sexually excite him, but I don't see those as fetishes, as just something that turns someone on doesn't satisfy the requirements to be a fetish.

As for catering to anyone, I don't do that. 



This..don't really have any fetishes. If I did I don't think He would cater to any of them. Now he does from time to time do or give to me something I enjoy, but only if he feels like it and it would do something for him as well.






zenny -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 8:41:09 PM)

Which definition are you using? I ask because several of the general definitions for fetish, the one I assume OP means, would classify most all types of sexual deviance as a fetish. I wouldn't think you're that vanilla [;)] .

As to the OP, if there is something they really want to try or have to have and I'm not opposed I'll attempt to work it in. If the latter typically as a reward.




LadyPact -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 8:54:20 PM)

Merriam-Webster.

Definition of FETISH1 a : an object (as a small stone carving of an animal) believed to have magical power to protect or aid its owner; broadly : a material object regarded with superstitious or extravagant trust or reverence b : an object of irrational reverence or obsessive devotion : prepossession c : an object or bodily part whose real or fantasied presence is psychologically necessary for sexual gratification and that is an object of fixation to the extent that it may interfere with complete sexual expression 2 : a rite or cult of fetish worshipers 3 : fixation




SexyBossyBBW -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 8:54:55 PM)

I don't cater, so am no fun to slaves whose fetishes are not "relinquishing all choice;" but that isn't what you asked.

The most unusual/freaky to me, is request for castration. M




zenny -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 9:22:42 PM)

So... you're using all of those? Not some of the others ones that (again, I assume) are closer to the OPs meaning?

Dictionary.com
3.
Psychology . any object or nongenital part of the body that causes a habitual erotic response or fixation.

Urban Dictionary has several that apply but they are simply extrapolations of the one I posted.

Haha, I just realized I posted in the "Ask a Mistress" section. I should probably start checking where the wheel takes me. Oh well. I assume you ladies don't mind variety. Don't ask me to tuck though...




Delilya -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 9:27:54 PM)

Wrap him in shrink wrap and tickle his feet till he pee'd himself. He wasn't "mine", I was bartering for work I needed done.




LadyPact -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/14/2011 9:56:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

So... you're using all of those? Not some of the others ones that (again, I assume) are closer to the OPs meaning?

Dictionary.com
3.
Psychology . any object or nongenital part of the body that causes a habitual erotic response or fixation.

Urban Dictionary has several that apply but they are simply extrapolations of the one I posted.

Haha, I just realized I posted in the "Ask a Mistress" section. I should probably start checking where the wheel takes me. Oh well. I assume you ladies don't mind variety. Don't ask me to tuck though...



Won't get that from Me.  You'll probably see many of us in the Master's forum.  A very high majority of the questions that get asked around here are basically the same if you were asking or replying to either gender, so it really doens't matter.  You'll find that we welcome folks with good input.

In clip's case, he's just not a fetishist.  There's nothing that I could even go so far as to say that he's fixated on.  Not shoes, not feet, not a particular toy that gets used, not any particular kind of play.  I'm very glad of that, as often fetishes can be obsessed on to the point of interfering in a dynamic.




LadyConstanze -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/15/2011 2:13:18 AM)

It depends really, if it is something I like too (like leather) then yup, most definitely, or I like making a bit of a game out of it, somebody with a foot fetish... Let's see what he's willing to do to kiss and touch the foot...

If I don't like the fetish or it grosses me out (coprophilia comes to mind) it's a no go area, and no matter how aroused anybody would be by seeing me in latex, it ain't going to happen unless they would be willing to buy me some special coated latex, because otherwise I'll break out in really nasty, itchy skin hives and I'm simply not masochist enough to do that.

In general I think the fetishes need to be compatible, if I have to force myself to do something because the sub/slave requires it, there's no fun and then I'm just servicing, if somebody demands it, they're not right for me and they're better off booking a paid session with somebody since it will be a service.




myotherself -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/15/2011 2:54:53 AM)

OP - I took the easy route...I found a Master with the same kinks as me. What I enjoy, he enjoys. Makes life really simple.




Madame4a -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/15/2011 4:22:23 AM)

I guess I have to wonder why I'd be catering to a slave's anything.. fetish or otherwise... and I'd suggest that fetishists might not make good slaves...

I'd guess if I had "clients" I'd cater to them.... maybe a play partner or bottom..but not a slave




SylvereApLeanan -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/15/2011 9:44:16 AM)

The only fetishes I cater to are mine...and I don't have any, by clinical standards.  The only fetishes I've ever attempted to entertain were for latex (full enclosure) and gas masks.  However, the person with those fetishes was not a slave.  In any case, I didn't cater to them.  I approached them on my terms, not his.  I will never cater to anyone.  If I can't appreciate the fetish on its own merits or at least tolerate it because I care deeply for the other person, then it won't happen.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/15/2011 10:14:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AcademyForSlaves

Personally I do not mind if a slave has fetishes, even if he worries they seem strange or bizarre, because I enjoy experimenting with fantasies, and as long as he serves Me the way I like then I do not mind rewarding him with what I know he likes.

What are your views on this subject?

My views are that if anyone I was involved with thought I was 'rewarding' them by doing something I wasn't particularly interested in they might well feel hurt and upset. But I guess paying customers don't have quite the same set of concerns.

Nice advert, though, this thread.




LadyConstanze -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/15/2011 10:54:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

Nice advert, though, this thread.


I have that feeling with most comments from the OP...

But yes, clients want often fetish fulfillment and the requirement is they have a good time and the domme pretends she is into it convincingly. Nothing wrong with it, really, it's a fair exchange, money for service...




Vendaval -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/21/2011 12:17:15 AM)

Something I find disturbing on a psychological level, not really sure why, is slapping someone hard across the face. I am happy to cane and paddle and flog and whip all over the body but face slapping bothers me.




ElanSubdued -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/21/2011 1:54:49 PM)

Tantriqu,

quote:

...things I'll never be involved in in any form include financial; 'forced' bi-; married men; switches; escalating masochism/permanent mutilation including castration and self-cannibalism; cross-dressing; race play; foot fetishism; diaper play; inescapable and permanent bondage, etc., i.e., the 'do-me' dudes.


Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your words, however, I think attaching a do-me moniker to specific fetishes is unfair and inaccurate.  Do-me tastes range all over the map.  Indeed, some of the things you've listed are activities and interactions common in the BDSM vernacular and that many kinksters enjoy.  It is fine to say you won't participate in certain activities and/or dynamics, but to brand all who enjoy these as do-me types seems misguided.  Do you really think all switches are just do-me types in disguise?  As for inescapable bondage, I attend a rope group where it is sometimes a specific goal to create bondage that is inescapable;  I can vouch that none of the people attending are do-me types.




ElanSubdued -> RE: Slaves Fetishes (5/21/2011 1:59:19 PM)

LadyConstanze,

quote:

VaguelyCurious:
Nice advert, though, this thread.

LadyConstanze:
I have that feeling with most comments from the OP...


Yep.  VC is rather good at "cutting to the chase". :-)




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875