Najakcharmer -> RE: When other roles/dynamics are in contradiction to your own view of the natural order of things.. (5/12/2006 4:11:26 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slavejali I'm guessing that is why fem Dommes find it so hard to actually get a male sub who actually wants the whole kit and kaboodle, the play part is intense, I can apreicate that, but the living of it, day to day....might go against the grain of very very many men and masculinity itself would be very hard to suppressed on a long term basis.... That depends on how you define masculinity, and also on your personal tastes in a femdom D/s relationship. My ideal of a D/s relationship is samurai to Lord, or knight to Lady, or alpha wolf to pack. There is loyalty, honor, respect, obedience, duty and fealty. The samurai or the knight gives his fealty and obedience and directs the strength of his fighting spirit to fulfill his duty to Her with honor. He is no less a man for offering this fealty, and in some cultures he is considered more of a man because he gives his absolute devotion and service. In the animal kingdom, the wolves of a hunting pack willingly submit to a competent alpha female who has more seasons as a hunter or keener senses that let her lead them more often to a successful hunt and away from danger. If a wolf became rabid and insane, no longer bound by the social structure of the pack, a male beta wolf might be able to physically defeat a female alpha. But if he does not have the qualities that make a competent pack leader, if she has a good enough track record of leadership, the rest of the pack won't let him. The alpha wolf feels a keen sense of responsibility to competently lead and care for the pack, and the pack knows this and accepts the alpha's dominance whether the alpha is male or female. Female alphas who are more dominant in the pack than their mates are less common than male alphas in most of the pack hunting species, but they do exist. There is a fairly popular femdom model that is based on denying a male some or all of his masculinity, punishing or negating or denying his sexuality, sissifying him, etc. What I find interesting is that this is far more typically a male fantasy than a female one, though that's not to say that some women don't find it appealing also. More commonly it will be the man who specifically requests that type of fantasy, and the woman will say that she feels more comfortable if her partner remains "more of a man" even if she is the dominant one in the relationship. I appreciate my sub for being male, for being a man. He is a strong man, intelligent, capable and competent. He is quite capable of taking charge of a situation and fixing things to his satisfaction. His manhood and strength does not detract from his service to me; it enhances it, and in fact may well be at the core of it. He is a knight and I am his Lady. I am alpha to my pack, because that is my nature. A deep part of me feels that the entire pack's survival depends on the strongest and most competent wolf establishing the best possible leadership, either by brute force, by sheer will and cunning, or by alliance and acclaim. I experience this feeling as something like a biological imperative, and so I perform. I don't want to invalidate other people's feelings or their choice of D/s relationships. Or more accurately their need for a certain type of D/s relationship; it probably isn't a choice any more than being heterosexual or homosexual is a choice. This is just my life. YMMV.
|
|
|
|