RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:53:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

A horse can be trained one of two ways. It can be broken, very much like a woman can be broken, and all you are left with is a horse that is resentful, but obeys because its better than dealing with the abuse, until that day comes when the horse can break free... and then its gone.

Or, you can tame a horse the way so many do, including many of the spanish and the native americans, with tenderness, patience, kindness and firmness. Winning over the trust of the horse until the horse and the man, or woman, become one. This is the horse that serves out of loyalty and adoration, one who can roam off for miles, and still respond to a whistle.

There are many ways to train. Surprisingly enough, women can train in both methods just as easily as men.


A highly abused horse can also turn rogue and will happily try to kill it's rider if it gets the chance. Subdued by violence, yes, willing to submit, not so much.




RedMagic1 -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:54:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: banditmel
Most anti-feminist like to spend their waking hours ranting and complaining all over the virtual world that rape doesn't exist.

In large part I agree with you, and I hope you post more often. However, I believe that you -- and many other people on these boards and in real life -- give too much power to vocal antifeminists, because they are so annoying, and so easy to spot. They tend to be relatively powerless, in reality, and the bigger obstacle to change is the people who can't-be-bothered-about-feminists, if you will. The ones who will let statements of concern go in one ear and out the other like so much white noise, a 21st century version of "don't worry your pretty head about it."

If people only respond to substantial posts, in substantial ways, there will be a decent conversation.




PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:54:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

A horse can be trained one of two ways. It can be broken, very much like a woman can be broken, and all you are left with is a horse that is resentful, but obeys because its better than dealing with the abuse, until that day comes when the horse can break free... and then its gone.

Or, you can tame a horse the way so many do, including many of the spanish and the native americans, with tenderness, patience, kindness and firmness. Winning over the trust of the horse until the horse and the man, or woman, become one. This is the horse that serves out of loyalty and adoration, one who can roam off for miles, and still respond to a whistle.

There are many ways to train. Surprisingly enough, women can train in both methods just as easily as men.


Interesting and what is the whip for in taming or any other taming techniques that use 'patience, kindness and firmness' in circus horses from Spain etc?




tazzygirl -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:54:30 AM)

Agreed.




BonesFromAsh -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:55:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PdxJ

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather
We are by definition discussing consensual domination, not rape.


So, what true domination is doesn't matter in the discussion.
Ok, going by consensual on both sides?
Yes, males will opt for the physical - why? Because we all go screaming back to our DNA.
Females will opt for the mental aspect because they can't physically force a man to do anything.





Interesting article I came across the other day applies to the "screaming back to our DNA" thought....
http://www.latrobe.edu.au/news/articles/2011/podcasts/what-makes-a-eunuch/transcript

quote:


Well just actually now we're finishing up a manuscript, which actually asks the rather intriguing to me a very basic question and that is, what is the personality effect of castration? One has contemporary stereotyped that the person's a wimp afraid of everything but the eunuchs were generals, past eunuchs were, the senior diplomats, they had to be wise and firm at certain points but it turns out we actually ran on the internet what's called the Big Five Personality Test.

It's a well-established test that defines personality and we ran it for 150 eunuchs who were androgen-deprived voluntarily castrated individuals against a huge amount of other people who filled in our survey because it was posted in the site called eunuch.org and people who are interested could fill it in as well. So we have individuals who are androgen-deprived and we have somewhere like 1300 of people who identify as wannabes. They're fascinated with and liked the idea of being castrated but they haven't gone forward with it. So they're very similar personalities in terms of all these presentations of odd obsessions.

The difference is one subgroup has actually is androgen-deprived. And we actually now what it means to be androgen-deprived in terms of what effect it has in this well-validated standardized personality test. And it turns out the one thing that changes radically is agreeability goes up. Now that means unlike a person's a wimp but someone says what you want to go to this movie or that movie and they say I don't care. But it's also true that if they decide, you know I'm happy to do what you'd like. I don't need to fight over it. I will save my fighting for more important things. This is wise.

A lot of the wisdom comes from being agreeable. We suspect that was the key trait that made them so effective as diplomats, negotiators, people who could resolve a tension conflicts to prevent them from becoming worst and to allow empires to continue for generations upon generations. They provided stability. The wisdom that comes by not being reflexively aggressive, which is sort of what happens with teenage males who are high on testosterone.


So....DNA-based physical strength is the most effective form of dominance? Who defines "effective" and does it broadly apply to everyone?




PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:56:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I have grown out my hair so that I have a ponytail, Peon. Just thought I'd share.

I am also thinking of a friend's colt, who is with a trainer right now. Yeah. Domestically bred horses are creampuffs. Sure.


Agreed.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:57:07 AM)

What are you agreeing to? Or do you not recognize sarcasm?




PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:57:47 AM)

Of course muscle is the best form of dominance over both men and women. It's how Governments have always ruled. When women had the same rights as lunatics it was easy for abusers to physically abuse.




LadyConstanze -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:58:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PhilSlave


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

A horse can be trained one of two ways. It can be broken, very much like a woman can be broken, and all you are left with is a horse that is resentful, but obeys because its better than dealing with the abuse, until that day comes when the horse can break free... and then its gone.

Or, you can tame a horse the way so many do, including many of the spanish and the native americans, with tenderness, patience, kindness and firmness. Winning over the trust of the horse until the horse and the man, or woman, become one. This is the horse that serves out of loyalty and adoration, one who can roam off for miles, and still respond to a whistle.

There are many ways to train. Surprisingly enough, women can train in both methods just as easily as men.


Interesting and what is the whip for in taming or any other taming techniques that use 'patience, kindness and firmness' in circus horses from Spain etc?


OMG! Yeah like they will "beat" the lions with the whip and the lions are so afraid that they do what they are told... Nothing to do with training, just with fear (in which crazy world do you live - oops I already know - found anybody yet?)

OK, obviously you've never had anything to do with horses, the whip is for show and commands, have you EVER seen anybody whipping a horse? I have seen it once, and luckily the guy who owned the stable was at the guy who tried to whip the horse before we were, he was dealing with the RSPCA and banned...





tazzygirl -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:58:56 AM)

quote:

Interesting and what is the whip for in taming or any other taming techniques that use 'patience, kindness and firmness' in circus horses from Spain etc?


Did I not say there was two ways?

A whip can be just for show as well, as well as a training tool that has nothing to do with abuse.




PeonForHer -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:59:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious


Jump higher, Skippy, jump higher! [:D][:D][:D]




See, I very nearly found that horny. [;)]




PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 9:59:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

What are you agreeing to? Or do you not recognize sarcasm?


Oh, you were being sarcastic.....




LadyConstanze -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:00:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PhilSlave

Of course muscle is the best form of dominance over both men and women. It's how Governments have always ruled. When women had the same rights as lunatics it was easy for abusers to physically abuse.


My bad, I thought you lived in a civilized country where the government is elected...




PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:00:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Interesting and what is the whip for in taming or any other taming techniques that use 'patience, kindness and firmness' in circus horses from Spain etc?


Did I not say there was two ways?

A whip can be just for show as well, as well as a training tool that has nothing to do with abuse.


So let me get this straight the trainer shows the horse the whip and it obeys?




PeonForHer -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:01:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I have grown out my hair so that I have a ponytail, Peon. Just thought I'd share.


Jeez, did I say - anywhere on CM - that I go for women in ponytails? If I did (because ponytails really do do it for me, feck knows why) - you have one astonishing memory!




Awareness -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:01:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

Thanks for getting back on track Awareness. ignoring the off topic things, What I'm getting is it comes down to penetration with a penis=dominance. Is that a fair summing up of your basic position?
  No, penile penetration is an implicitly dominant sexual act, but sexual dominance is the capacity to enforce your will.  Which essentially means physical power.  Female hetero subs like to struggle, they like to feel overwhelmed and know they're being fucked by a guy who can take what he wants.  And they get off on the sense of fear this can bring with it.  Many of them - even those who've been raped - get off on the idea of rough sex and rape fantasies.

  Basically, women like to be taken.  And dominance in the bedroom is about the desire to do as you will and having the physical capacity to enforce it.  In my experience, women adore being tossed around the bed.




PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:02:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: PhilSlave

Of course muscle is the best form of dominance over both men and women. It's how Governments have always ruled. When women had the same rights as lunatics it was easy for abusers to physically abuse.


My bad, I thought you lived in a civilized country where the government is elected...


Riots are put down, demonstrators beaten etc. in all countries.




PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:03:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

Thanks for getting back on track Awareness. ignoring the off topic things, What I'm getting is it comes down to penetration with a penis=dominance. Is that a fair summing up of your basic position?
  No, penile penetration is an implicitly dominant sexual act, but sexual dominance is the capacity to enforce your will.  Which essentially means physical power.  Female hetero subs like to struggle, they like to feel overwhelmed and know they're being fucked by a guy who can take what he wants.  And they get off on the sense of fear this can bring with it.  Many of them - even those who've been raped - get off on the idea of rough sex and rape fantasies.

  Basically, women like to be taken.  And dominance in the bedroom is about the desire to do as you will and having the physical capacity to enforce it.  In my experience, women adore being tossed around the bed.



Completely true.




tazzygirl -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:04:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PhilSlave


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Interesting and what is the whip for in taming or any other taming techniques that use 'patience, kindness and firmness' in circus horses from Spain etc?


Did I not say there was two ways?

A whip can be just for show as well, as well as a training tool that has nothing to do with abuse.


So let me get this straight the trainer shows the horse the whip and it obeys?



Its quite obvious you havent been around horses. Guess you believe spurs are used often and repeatedly too.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:04:23 AM)

Peon: yes you did, and yes I do.




Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625