RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread)

RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

LadyPact -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:32:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PdxJ Off hand, can you give a rough guess-timate of how many of the more experienced doms post those types of posts vs the younger, less experienced? Absolutely no idea. However, you don't see them nearly as often from the 'new' female Dominants.

ranja -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:32:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather Not being in a position to say, I'm going to ask the women who are. Do you find there to be a psychological difference in being penetrated by something that can impregnate you and something that cannot?[/color] yes... not to say that one is necessarily better than the other, but there is most definitely a difference about being fucked with a toy or a dick attached to a man. and i have known of men who highly get off on spunking inside a woman and actually like to say things like "get pregnant now you bitch" while cumming also for that reason sometimes condoms can be a hinderance, they might just take away a bit of the fun in that department. likewise some women might want to "suck" the spunk out of the man with their pussy... so the impregnation still is not really a dominant act... it still all depends on the mindset.

PdxJ -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:38:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: PdxJ Off hand, can you give a rough guess-timate of how many of the more experienced doms post those types of posts vs the younger, less experienced? Absolutely no idea. However, you don't see them nearly as often from the 'new' female Dominants. That doesn't surprise me. As far as experienced doms vs inexperienced doms, I'd bet it's less than 1 in 20.

RedMagic1 -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:40:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness In the vast majority of cases, height is only a problem if you think it's a problem. I agree, though six feet is a land I've never traveled to before, which is part of the allure. I will say that having sex with a taller, broader women (by which I mean "Amazon" breadth, not fat) provides penetration challenges, at least for me. With one woman, I couldn't make doggy style work at all, unless maybe I would have been standing on a box. I ended up getting her off by ordering her to cowgirl me. With another, I used a butt plug, a belt and my fist. No penis at all in the end game. I didn't feel like a service top in either situation. I felt as though I was taking power of the bodies of women who had a lot of options and chose me. So that in itself is a challenge, I believe, to the simplicity of a biological explanation. Even a dominant man with a sub woman can't necesarily throw her over his shoulder and carry her back to his cave where he impregnates her from behind.

BonesFromAsh -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:45:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PdxJ Manipulation (ie: Mindfucking) is an extremely useful and often used method. Manipulation comes in many forms. Did you mean what you said? Do you stand by your words as your truth or was it a "just stirring the pot to see what bubbles to the top" kind of thing?

VaguelyCurious -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:53:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PdxJ Manipulation (ie: Mindfucking) is an extremely useful and often used method. I think we disagree on the definition of a mindfuck. To me, a mindfuck is terrifying someone into thinking you're doing something you'd never do; that that credit card edge is a blade, that the banana in that toilet is actually shit (credit to RS on that one, I've never done it myself), that there's someone else watching from the closet they've never met before who's about to come out and join in the fun. To me, convincing some people on the internet that you're slightly stupider than you really are doesn't qualify.

PdxJ -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 10:57:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BonesFromAsh quote: ORIGINAL: PdxJ Manipulation (ie: Mindfucking) is an extremely useful and often used method. Manipulation comes in many forms. Did you mean what you said? Do you stand by your words as your truth or was it a "just stirring the pot to see what bubbles to the top" kind of thing? The conversation was dwindling - it needed stirred. No I don't believe it, that why I couldn't argue it further. I had no beliefs to stand on. I may not be the most experienced person in the room but I know physical force proves nothing. Sure, you can force someone to do something by breaking their spirit (much like the argument about the horse) but to truly dominate is not to break, but to bend ones will to your own.

CreepyStalker -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:01:03 AM)
Awww man, why did all the hilarious threads have to happen when I need to be doing other things? I'm loving the three-way trolling going on. It seems to have de-railed in the last few pages though, can we get back to posing gorgeous feminist ladies and ranting about what 'wimmin' are like? I'll start us off again if you like... Men are deficient because they have penises, which have been replaced by modern technology (dildos, vibrators, etc.) and so are now redundant. This upsets them, so they whinge about how they're supposed to be dominant really. Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED.

PeonForHer -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:01:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness No, penile penetration is an implicitly dominant sexual act If penile penetration is an implicitly dominant sexual act, then so is vaginal enveloping.

RedMagic1 -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:03:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker Men are deficient because they have penises, which have been replaced by modern technology (dildos, vibrators, etc.) and so are now redundant. This upsets them, so they whinge about how they're supposed to be dominant really. Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED. Boobs don't really do it for me, but if you put up the rear view of your current avatar, I will follow every post you make.

PeonForHer -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:03:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. They have. It's called a tankard, and contains Smile's Best Bitter.

VaguelyCurious -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:04:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. They have. It's called a tankard, and contains Smile's Best Bitter. Adequate? Perhaps. Superior? Naw.

Awareness -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:06:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED. They are as long as they're quiet. This usually requires me to stuff something in their mouth. Fortunately, this works out well for both of us.

LadyPact -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:11:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker Awww man, why did all the hilarious threads have to happen when I need to be doing other things? I'm loving the three-way trolling going on. It seems to have de-railed in the last few pages though, can we get back to posing gorgeous feminist ladies and ranting about what 'wimmin' are like? I'll start us off again if you like... Men are deficient because they have penises, which have been replaced by modern technology (dildos, vibrators, etc.) and so are now redundant. This upsets them, so they whinge about how they're supposed to be dominant really. Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED. Trust Me. CBT just isn't as fun that way.

CreepyStalker -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:12:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED. They are as long as they're quiet. This usually requires me to stuff something in their mouth. Fortunately, this works out well for both of us. I'll never understand male subs, what enjoyment you guys get out of buying your mistress a large and expensive chocolate gateaux is beyond me.

BonesFromAsh -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:13:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer If penile penetration is an implicitly dominant sexual act, then so is vaginal enveloping. See....that just made me smile. So, what about when a woman penetrates a man with a strap-on....is his rectal "enveloping" an equally dominant act? Good lord, are you suggesting that these sex acts are neither dominant or submissive? I'm so confused...does someone have the rulebook????

Awareness -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:20:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker I'll never understand male subs, what enjoyment you guys get out of buying your mistress a large and expensive chocolate gateaux is beyond me. I don't understand male subs either, there's a 22 page thread devoted to this very topic, although it totally petered out once I lost interest. Quality opponents are so hard to find. Where was I? Oh yes, women. Delightful creatures, total pain in the ass most of the time but useful for administering blowjobs. Also tend to be handy in the kitchen, although that's probably not a representative sample, I've just been fortunate in that regard.

PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:22:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker I'll never understand male subs, what enjoyment you guys get out of buying your mistress a large and expensive chocolate gateaux is beyond me. I don't understand male subs either, there's a 22 page thread devoted to this very topic, although it totally petered out once I lost interest. Quality opponents are so hard to find. Where was I? Oh yes, women. Delightful creatures, total pain in the ass most of the time but useful for administering blowjobs. Also tend to be handy in the kitchen, although that's probably not a representative sample, I've just been fortunate in that regard. They are also brilliant at cleaning and making lists.

Awareness -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:24:02 AM)
Yes, and terrible at finding their keys - but I digress.....

PhilSlave -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/30/2011 11:29:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness Yes, and terrible at finding their keys - but I digress..... Haha, but good at finding my car keys when I leave them around and start ranting, which is a plus.

Page: << < prev 14 15 [16] 17 18 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875