Arpig -> RE: Texter gets kicked out of theater and leaves (profane) VM (6/8/2011 11:05:49 AM)
|
quote:
Here's what I'm getting from the "texting in completely inappropriate circumsance" defenders' crowd thusfar: re the texting and/or 'flashlight' concern: "it's just modern technology, everybody does it, just accept it." Just a 'natural' manefestation of the technology. That's odd Edwynn, because I just went back through the entire thread and that's not the way I see it. There have been three posters who have not come out completely against cell phone use. Let's go back and see just what it was they said, shall we... #1 Said that you should just deal with it, and then in a later post said they did it and that they had never been bothered by others doing it. - Bang on, you got this one Edwynn, there's 1/3 saying what you say they say. #2 Says she has serious vision problems and therefore has to use her phone as a light in dimly lit places, even places where the light would be sufficient for normally sighted people. - This can't be counted as one in your column, sorry. Valid medical reasons trump pretty much anything else, and she didn't say that texting, calling, talking was OK, just that sometimes a person has a valid reason to turn their phone on. So we are still 1/3 for you. #3 Said as long as the phone was on silent it wouldn't matter, and then later on when somebody pointed out ways it could still be annoying even if it didn't ring, she said she had never noticed that, but agreed how it would be annoying and disruptive. - Started out in your column, but admitted that her previously stated position was wrong, and amended her position, so not in your column either. So we are still at 1/3. Now regarding the PSA, here we have four posters, lets review their positions shall we. #1 Yup, bang on. Exactly what she said...and...yup, she's the "crowd" you mentioned. 1/4 for you. #2 Again, you nailed it, that's what she said about the PSA...but hold on...she's not in favour of inappropriate cell phone use at all. Sorry, still at 1/4. #3 Same thing as #2. Still 1/4. #4 Yes she finds the PSA in poor taste as well, but she is #3 from the previous list, so not part of your "crowd". We're still at 1/4. So the "crowd" you spoke of consists of a single poster. Way to exagerate there, Dude. Since you're going to play fast and loose with the facts to sell your point, maybe you should change your profile name to FastEddy. [;)]
|
|
|
|