Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: hang on a mo...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: hang on a mo... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/17/2011 10:42:01 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Well you are granting him a far more high minded and laudable position than I would grant him.I think he is savvy enough to understand signing such a pledge would be akin to blowing up his candidacy in the general.Perhaps I am too cynical.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/17/2011 10:47:45 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
He would have to live up to the pledge, and I am cynical too, because he is far more moderate than anyone else running

I wonder if that will help or hurt him

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/17/2011 10:51:52 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Hurts during the nomination process.not signing is a huge aid if he reaches the general...where he would of necessity need to court moderates and independents.
Thats my guess ..and I think that is the way his campaign is looking at it.Coming out of the convention as the candidate saddled with this pledge would leave him to open to attacks that he is too far right for the nation.

< Message edited by slvemike4u -- 6/17/2011 10:52:39 PM >


_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/17/2011 10:53:40 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Take a look at the times of Roe vs Wade. the 70's were a bitch for contraceptives. Dalcon Shield ring a bell? Introduced in 1971, it was finally pulled from the market in 1974.. after the filing of over 300,000 law suits. What is available today is much safer, but the shield still lives in the memories of older women, and is passed down to daughters.

Religions, especially Catholic, were dead set against any birth control. Marriage rape was still considered a "man's right". Thurman vs City of Torrington didnt take place until the early 80's.

Birth control pills, at that time, were extremely heavy in dosage, and caused many problems. Most women tried to live by their religion and used the calender method... and we all know how well that works.

Its only been the past couple of years that insurance companies... some.. have started paying for birth control... yet they paid freely for viagra. Planned Parenthood has been a blessing in that aspect, covering the cost for many women when their insurance wouldnt.

So, the climate under which Roe vs Wade was extremely against women making these decisions for themselves. Why? Many reasons. Religion was only part of it. Birth control is a huge industry for pharmaceutical companies. Its also a way to control women as a whole. Controlling not only our sexuality, but our earning potential, our ability to rise in the career of our choices and the decision making within the home.

Painting this issue with a "religion" brush doesnt work for me. Its all about the control.

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 6/17/2011 10:54:07 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/17/2011 10:56:22 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Hurts during the nomination process.not signing is a huge aid if he reaches the general...where he would of necessity need to court moderates and independents.
Thats my guess ..and I think that is the way his campaign is looking at it.Coming out of the convention as the candidate saddled with this pledge would leave him to open to attacks that he is too far right for the nation.


Some might think that "anything is better than Obama"

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 4:16:28 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Most of those among the Reps that oppose abortion, make it their primary concern for the electability of someone. I find that to be an extreme position, that is not based in logic. Most of those that are vocal, and active about being anti-abortion, do it with zeal. So the terms extreme, and zealot are applicable in my perception.


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

The Reps were hijacked long ago by extreme christians, and the anti-abortion part of the platform was inserted because of them. The faster any political group can distance themselves from religious zealots, the better off they will be..

Ok.

Orion, I have much respect for you as a poster, but this one threw me a bit for a loop.

Why is it "extreme" and "religious zealotry" to oppose abortion?

Firm




_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 5:40:20 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

I will say that I am not opposed to abortion being legal, but I believe it should be very rare... because, in general, I am opposed to abortion.


Safe, legal, and RARE works for me.

And to encourage rarity, REAL sex education and access to contraceptives, as opposed to Abstinence-only sex education, which is not effective.

Mitt Romney would be a formidable opponent in the general election, but will have a real hard time in the primary.

(in reply to TreasureKY)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 5:45:05 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Most of those among the Reps that oppose abortion, make it their primary concern for the electability of someone. I find that to be an extreme position, that is not based in logic. Most of those that are vocal, and active about being anti-abortion, do it with zeal. So the terms extreme, and zealot are applicable in my perception.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

The Reps were hijacked long ago by extreme christians, and the anti-abortion part of the platform was inserted because of them. The faster any political group can distance themselves from religious zealots, the better off they will be..

Ok.

Orion, I have much respect for you as a poster, but this one threw me a bit for a loop.

Why is it "extreme" and "religious zealotry" to oppose abortion?

Thank you for the reply.  But I still am a bit unsure about where you are coming from.

I see that Treasure answered some, as did others, and I really am not intent on opening and participating on a debate about the "right or wrong" of abortion per se, just how it is perceived by others in a political versus moral context.

First, who, precisely are "the Reps" you mentioned?  Elective representatives of the people?  Just the ones who are mentioned as signing the pledge?

Second, if someone believes that abortion is taking the life of an innocent person (you may not agree), would it not be an honorable and moral thing for them to work to stop this murder?  Including working to have our elected representatives achieve this goal?

Third, how is this particular method different from any of the other methods used by people who wish to "impose" their moral beliefs on the world through the democratic political process?  Especially other "single issue" voters?

Fourth, how are the politicians who sign such a pledge "captured" or "reprehensible" (my words, not yours, but the sense I get) any more than any other politician who signs a pledge or simply makes a campaign promise?

Firm

Just looking for interesting, intellectual discussion, not political Armageddon here, guys.


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 5:48:36 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Why is it "extreme" and "religious zealotry" to oppose abortion?

Orion will answer for himself, of course. But I have an answer too. It is not religious zealotry to be against abortion. It is religious zealotry to demand that one's religious views be invested with the power of law.

hmm, maybe room for a 'hole 'nother thread here.

In this particular case, I would equate the specific "religious view" as a "moral view".

In which case, I'd say that all laws are based on a person's or group of persons' "moral view" of the world.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 5:55:17 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
Wait, by "Reps", you mean "Republicans"?

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 6:04:38 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Yeah the republican party. As far as the morality of abortion, that is a debate I no longer enter into. If someone has such an extreme view on an issue, that does not provide for common welfare of the citizens, I consider it illogical to have it as a primary reason to vote or not vote for someone, but that again is personal opinion.

Religious views are moral/ethical views, but often religion takes it beyond what most may consider a reasonable conclusion. I have as yet not seen very many ethical people in office, or wield power. There are a few exceptions, but most of them did not remain politicians for very long.

As far as campaign promises, the last time I saw a contract that many people bought into, it was a "Contract with America" and none of those that signed it lived up to the agreement. You are correct, these contracts are no more than a publicized campaign promise that will likely not be met.

Religion should never mix with politics, and politics should not mix with religion. When they do you often have corruption of power.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 6:44:35 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

I wonder why Paul would sign it, I thought he was so individual rights, get government out of the people's life etc???

His personal views on abortion notwithstanding, my understanding of his political position (open to correction) is that the federal government has no business involving itself in the matter at all.

Actually Ron Paul has introduced federal anti abortion bills that would make all abortions murder.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 6:57:32 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Yeah the republican party. As far as the morality of abortion, that is a debate I no longer enter into. If someone has such an extreme view on an issue, that does not provide for common welfare of the citizens, I consider it illogical to have it as a primary reason to vote or not vote for someone, but that again is personal opinion.

Religious views are moral/ethical views, but often religion takes it beyond what most may consider a reasonable conclusion. I have as yet not seen very many ethical people in office, or wield power. There are a few exceptions, but most of them did not remain politicians for very long.

As far as campaign promises, the last time I saw a contract that many people bought into, it was a "Contract with America" and none of those that signed it lived up to the agreement. You are correct, these contracts are no more than a publicized campaign promise that will likely not be met.

Religion should never mix with politics, and politics should not mix with religion. When they do you often have corruption of power.

Thanks, O.

Some points that I'll pass by, some I agree with (basically) and some I find interesting and indicative of part of the problem with this entire debate.

Again, not trying to personalize the abortion debate, but using your post to point out certain assumptions that often bother me in this debate.  If you feel I have misconstrued or taken your words out of context, please correct me.

In this phrase: "If someone has such an extreme view on an issue, that does not provide for common welfare of the citizens, I consider it illogical to have it as a primary reason to vote or not vote for someone ...", I find a couple of contradictions.  Or at least grounds for further questioning and discussion.

First, it seems that you are equating an "extreme view" with the belief that "abortion is immoral"?  Or that someone who has the view that "abortion=murder", and therefore their attempts to lessen it through our legal, democratic means is somehow not seeking to "provide for common welfare of the citizens" by saving those lives?

If these are your beliefs, how can you justify them, other than you disagree with them politically, and therefore attack them on other grounds (imposition of your religion!)  in order to "impose" your own personal "moral beliefs"? 

If this is what you are doing, then I'd argue that this is the exact same thing that you claim that they are doing: attempting to impose your moral beliefs on others through the political and legal processes of our government.

Second, the sentence "Religion should never mix with politics, and politics should not mix with religion. When they do you often have corruption of power.", depending on how it is interpreted can be either right or wrong.

I believe that the mixing of organized, bureaucratic organizations of religion and politics are a Very Bad Thing.  The gaining of direct political power by religious organizations, in which a position of authority within a religious organization confers direct political, secular power isn't good for a free and open society (although the Brits monarchy's place in the Church of England, as it currently stands would make for some interesting discussions ... ahhh, another thread ....).

However, if you accept that religions are a strong factor in the formation of moral views, and that moral views of the citizens have a place in the democratic political equation of the formation of laws, then I believe that the "lack of separation" does not, and should not necessarily be condemned. In fact, the formation of laws without consideration of their morality is the antithesis of good government.

Finally, I would simply disagree that the "Republican party has been captured by religious zealots" in all it's forms and arguments. (another damn thread!)

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 7:00:22 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
FR:







Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 7:02:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I don't think he made that soritical leap, you did.   That is not necessarily mutually exclusive, but it is not necessarily mutually inclusive either. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 7:08:48 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

FR:







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5NfouRh2cY&feature=related

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 7:10:20 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I don't think he made that soritical leap, you did.   That is not necessarily mutually exclusive, but it is not necessarily mutually inclusive either. 

Damn.  Make me look up shit, huh, Ron? 

So´rit´ic`al
a.    1.    Of or pertaining to a sorites; resembling a sorites.

Damn!  Hadta dig deeper! ...

sorites

n  (Logic)

a a polysyllogism in which the premises are arranged so that intermediate conclusions are omitted, being understood, and only the final conclusion is stated

b a paradox of the form

these few grains of sand do not constitute a heap, and the addition of a single grain never makes what is not yet a heap into a heap: so no matter how many single grains one adds it never becomes a heap 

(C16: via Latin from Greek soreites, literally: heaped, from soros a heap)
Ok.  I think I've got it.

What is my missing intermediate conclusion?

Firm



_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 7:30:22 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Firm,

I will get back to you on this, to explain the intermediate reasoning I am using. While I am away, think of the simple question of "Do we allow science or religion to determine when life begins, so that it has rights under the law?"

Take care,
Orion

< Message edited by OrionTheWolf -- 6/18/2011 7:44:05 AM >


_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 7:37:30 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Why is it "extreme" and "religious zealotry" to oppose abortion?

Orion will answer for himself, of course. But I have an answer too. It is not religious zealotry to be against abortion. It is religious zealotry to demand that one's religious views be invested with the power of law.

K.


THIS

Nobody likes abortion. But this is so succinct, thank you Kirata

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: hang on a mo... - 6/18/2011 7:39:53 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Sorry firm, the notebook here has no paste function.  I have tried this about 5 times to cut and paste the way I saw it.

Statements in paraphrase:
(o=Orion f=Firm)
o.A= Religious zealots have taken over the right wing of the conservatives.
o.B= and the anti abortion plank was originally inserted by those zealots and extremists.
o-f.C= (leap must be constructed here) only zealots and extremists oppose abortion.
f.D= (Orion is stating that (or if you prefer Therefore;) is it zealot and extremist to oppose abortion.

  

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: hang on a mo... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109