OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY Second, if someone believes that abortion is taking the life of an innocent person (you may not agree), would it not be an honorable and moral thing for them to work to stop this murder? Including working to have our elected representatives achieve this goal? If they are basing that life begins at the moment of conception, then they are not basing it on scientific and legal emthods to determine a living human being, that has all of the rights of another human being. They are using belief and faith. If we take that to an extreme, then killing an abortion doctor would be legal, as you are committing justifiable homicide. quote:
Third, how is this particular method different from any of the other methods used by people who wish to "impose" their moral beliefs on the world through the democratic political process? Especially other "single issue" voters? This method comes from imposing a religious based belief, that has no substantive ethical basis in law, except to uphold the religious belief. Thou shall not murder is something the common welfare of the people all have an agreement on, without the use of religious belief. Do you see the difference there? Now when does murder happen? What method should be used to determine that? Scientific methods of observation, and then the use of reason should come before a purely religious belief, when determining a law. Locally I have opposed ordinances, and laws that were fueled purely by religious belief. So there is not much difference in single issue voters that base their decisions purely upon religion and faith. The differences only being the issues they address. I will further add that not all that are opposed to abortion are extremist or zealots, it is the ones that are, that seem to drive much of that political fire. Hope this makes sense as I am a bit rushed. Will try to return later to check on the topic more.
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|