rawtape -> RE: Atheists fed up? Believe it! - Guest Voices - The Washington Post (6/19/2011 8:18:24 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Now, put this up to the existence of "god", how do you scientifically test this theory? You can't at this point, but that does not mean that god does not exist. All it means is you cannot test for a divine being(s). Now, you can do the entire "spaghetti monster" bit, because you think it is cute, whatever, but really it says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of god. True, the "spaghetti monster" says nothing about either the existence or nonexistence of god. What it does point out, however, is that there is no particular reason to "privilege" a thesis about god any more than all the other concepts whose validity or lack thereof is currently not provable. One can conceive of an unlimited number of such non-verifiable concepts, e.g. are there undetectable miniature pink unicorns prancing about everyone's head, are invisible fairies spitting on my food, am I part of a simulation, etc. However, most people don't waste their time thinking about these concepts, each as untestable as the god thesis; instead, they simply dismiss these concepts out of hand. Why then, should the god thesis be privileged and treated differently?
|
|
|
|