DecadentDesire
Posts: 234
Joined: 6/18/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss quote:
ORIGINAL: DecadentDesire What he said. Try to focus on using "I" language, as well. "I" language is the art of structuring potentially negative, critical or explosive statements so the focus is on you, and not on the other person.Hence, saying "I don't think I would be the right submissive for you" instead of "You just aren't the right dominant for me". The latter can be taken as implying that there is some deficiency or problem with him where as the former does not. It might seem like a difference in semantics, but it has a huge impact on how people receive and react to the message. "I" language is quite right. Your example, though, is not a good one. Here's why: I don't think I would be the right submissive for you. The answer is: "You're wrong. I know what is right for me!" An example, more in line with "I" language would be: This relationship isn't working for me. Or... I'm not comfortable continuing in this. Or... There's no chemistry for me . Thank you for pointing that out. I didn't have time to put much thought into the explanation and you are right. My example is counterproductive to being direct.
_____________________________
I was once a Rabbit, driven Mad, by the Decadence of his Desires...
|