RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

Lucylastic -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 6:51:46 PM)

Fox News cited each of these “actual news headlines” as their “source.” is from the OP(buzzfeed.com) first line.... that didnt give you a clue???
that is NOT a lie
they used their own headlines to link to other stories, making it out to be what the writer intended
thats not opinion or a blog, that is fox news nations take on it, Fox news is responsible for it, not bloggers.
you cannot spin it any more, but yet you deny the truth



erieangel -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 6:57:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

I love the one about NY teaching unwanted baby laws. Are those laws supposed to be kept secret?? A local college woman is on trial here for murdering her unwanted new born, she could go to prison for life, and all she really needed to do was take the baby to any one of our three hospitals and leave it there. She did not know that PA has unwanted baby laws.


Um.... huh?


PA has an unwanted baby. Any baby under the age of 6 months (i believe) can be taken to the nearest hospital and left with emergency room staff--no questions asked. Last year, a 19 year old college student kept her pregnancy secret, gave birth in her dorm and then killed the baby and threw it away. When questioned and told about the unwanted baby law she claimed she didn't know anything about it. Now she says had she known about the law, she would have taken the baby to the hospital. She will likely spend the rest of her life in prison because she was ignorant.



tazzygirl -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 7:39:41 PM)

Claimed is right. 19, gave birth in her dorm... how many life time movies has been done about this topic? How often has it been on the news? in Pennsylvania is called The Newborn Protection Act. Just walk up and drop it off with any hospital employee. This has been a law here since 2003, and discussed in any sex education or parenting classes in schools.

http://ehealthforum.com/health/topic112960.html

Sounds like she didnt want to risk her scholarship.



Sanity -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 8:12:15 PM)


I guess you could say FOX NEWS is "responsible" for the "news content" on Fox Nation....

In the same way MSNBC is "responsible" for Ed Schultz's nightly "newscasts".

Sure... [;)]

Still, the article linked to in the OP shouldnt have photoshop cropped the Fox Nation banner off the screenshots of the stories it presented as FOX NEWS articles. That would be a lot like me SERIOUSLY trying to assert that Ed Schultz reads the news for MSNBC on his show.

Dont you think?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Fox News cited each of these “actual news headlines” as their “source.” is from the OP(buzzfeed.com) first line.... that didnt give you a clue???
that is NOT a lie
they used their own headlines to link to other stories, making it out to be what the writer intended
thats not opinion or a blog, that is fox news nations take on it, Fox news is responsible for it, not bloggers.
you cannot spin it any more, but yet you deny the truth




imperatrixx -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 8:25:27 PM)

No. They were genuine factual news articles written by other people and reposted with different headlines.

There was no opinion, no commentary, no op-ed, no blogging, no satirical comment, absolutely no original content whatsoever added to the news articles. The only difference was the headline change.



Sanity -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 8:31:25 PM)


Sort of like the spin Ed Schultz (or any of the other comedians who leftists normally get their news from) put on the news... just not as bad.


quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

No. They were genuine factual news articles written by other people and reposted with different headlines.

There was no opinion, no commentary, no op-ed, no blogging, no satirical comment, absolutely no original content whatsoever added to the news articles. The only difference was the headline change.



imperatrixx -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 8:39:36 PM)

lol you think Fox Nation is the "comedy" section of the website?

I don't actually disagree there.



MrRodgers -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 9:18:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Fox Nation is a blog... but go on pretending that its the same as FOX NEWS if you want, if thats what makes your mouth foam


The Fox Nation was created for people who believe in the United States of America and its ideals, as expressed in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Emancipation Proclamation. It is a community that believes in the American Dream: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. One that believes being an American is an honor, as well as a great responsibility – and a wonderful adventure.

This is a place for people who believe we live in a great country, a welcoming refuge for legal immigrants who want to contribute their talents and abilities to make our way of life even greater. We believe we should enjoy the company and support of each other, delighting in the creativity, ingenuity, and work ethic of one and all, while observing the rules of civility and mutual respect and, most importantly, strengthening our diverse society by striving for unity.

The Fox Nation is committed to the core principles of tolerance, open debate, civil discourse, and fair and balanced coverage of the news. It is for those opposed to intolerance, excessive government control of our lives, and attempts to monopolize opinion or suppress freedom of thought, expression, and worship.

We invite all Americans who share these values to join us here at Fox Nation.

http://nation.foxnews.com/our-purpose

Fact is, I see AP, Washington Times, Daily Beast and FoxNews. The facts are that this spin by Fox is nothing new at all. This has been going on for years and pretty much since Murdock bought Metro Media. The employees will tell you as much and especially from the DC outlet. They hung on for a about a year because it was one of the more profitable.

Then there was no AP, Reuters, Washington Post or NY Times. Fox 'News' and commentary is essentially scripted by management and you will use the words they tell you to use.



Lucylastic -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/27/2011 9:49:02 PM)

I think Im going to start a thread about how many times they hijack other articles, just for shits n giggles.

1.why wont they give the headline thinker uppers name??

2.Dont they have their own news articles to take the piss out of?

3 DO they think that a giving such a biased slant is an embarrassment to their customer/viewer? Let alone their good name? !!!cough splutter bollocks cough!!

4.The facts are the facts, why did ONLY the headlines need changing if not to mislead.... they are fine using the full meat of the article (((((((shouldnt the said articles be showing some kind of lefty bias?

5. How are the proper headlines...biased towards the left, and non factual, so much that they need to be changed to be drama llama fodder??




Politesub53 -> RE: Real headlines vs Fox News headlines (6/28/2011 3:13:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

No. They were genuine factual news articles written by other people and reposted with different headlines.

There was no opinion, no commentary, no op-ed, no blogging, no satirical comment, absolutely no original content whatsoever added to the news articles. The only difference was the headline change.


Sanity told you once....It`s "Satire"......... How many more times. [8D]



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125