Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 8:11:12 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Yeah baby...I have got some fucking change for you.  And I think it is going to be great. 


Oh yeah, so you think its gonna be great, huh? Soooo.... what are you going to be shorting?


You are a pretty smart guy.  That was a more astute question than just about anyone has asked me.  You are waaaaay too fucking bright to be a liberal.  I'm not shorting anything.  A lot of where I make my money is in divorce law and as the economy goes to shit, divorces go up.  Also, I make money on rental income and as the economy goes to shit, more people can rent than buy.  What I am doing is paying off all debt.....credit cards, loans, bills and anything else you can name.  Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity, Crummy, Bachelor, Cavuto, Beck....they all say the same thing; the shit really hits the fan in 2012.  Now you may not listen to these people and you may consider them all to be very partisan but they are all pretty bright.  Are they fear mongering?  It is possible for all of them.............................................................except Cavuto....Forbes too.  So I have also stocked piled a certain amount of food.......a large amount to tell the truth........and ammunition.

Now...for the Joether dipshits and the Julias and the Mystics and other liberal circus acts, let me say this; I have no interest in seeing divorces go up and the loss of home ownership go up because this country FAILS.  The reason why I think the horrific changes that are on the horizon are great is because it is going to take a real catastrophe to kill liberalism and for people to rise up and change this country and demand personal responsibility and criminal accountability.  That's why.

< Message edited by lockedaway -- 7/1/2011 8:33:20 PM >

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 8:28:19 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

What you so utterly and clearly fail to grasp is that all of those people, whether Americans or nationals of a foreign country get paid because of the outsourcing. Isn't that true? Of course it is. What you also fail to grasp is that even with all of those extra people getting paid that arguably wouldn't be in the loop if the product was manufactured here, it is STILL MORE PROFITABLE TO OUTSOURCE. Got it? Do you understand? Because outsourcing is profitable....people outsource.


Oh, of course it's true that if you are willing to screw the workforce that probably positioned you to be profitable in the first place.
  But what's funniest about the dopey claim you're making about profit at the expense of of middle class jobs and then offering this apples and oranges example of a seaport adding a few cargo manipulators and pilots (Guess what friend, you're pitching your bullshit story to some who's worked in the Maritime business model as well as the Computer Technologies Business model and neither of your claims can be supported by a jobs gained vs lost calculation of any kind ... well not a factual one).
  Take Boston harbor for instance, the import traffic is up and jobs are in steady decline.
When all that the business plan is built around is profit at any cost, it's a lousy business model.




More stupidity from you.  Thank you for acknowledging that I am right.  I don't need that acknowledgment from you...it is pure fucking common sense.  Really second grader common sense. 

Where you fail...spectacularly fail is your idiot assertion that I am accurate because "you are willing to screw over the workforce that put you in power to begin with".  Wow, man, that was really fucking stupid!  It has nothing to do about "fucking over the workforce" man...power to the people and all of your other trite bullshit.

The fact is that the unionized workers that are working at your corporation strike every year for a 5% or more raise for a job that a 7th grader can do.  You property taxes go up every year.  You have new regs to deal with every year.  Do you REALLY think that an executive who outsources is outsourcing to spite Harry....the 43 year old guy that works putting on the rubber stripping?  Are you really THAT fucking stupid?  The decision to outsource typically comes from the accounting department or the person that has been hired to do a financial analysis to maintain or increase market share.  If you think someone like Lee Iacocca sits at his desk and says "that guy Phillip in window glazing REALLY fucking pissed me off and I'll show him....I'm going to move this whole outfit to the Philippines!" then you need to go detox and then enroll in a community college.

I have read some of your other ivory towered, naive, liberal horseshit.  Try to think critically.  Try.............................................................just fucking try to put yourself in the position of the executive who is losing market share due to overhead from a myriad of angles and what hard decisions he/she may have to make.

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 8:48:33 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
FR

The best they could ever do is to make all offshore payments non-deductible. FULL tax is levied on EVERY good that comes into this country and there is simply no deduction for it. The problem is that I'm not sure there is any significant deduction on the corporate level. It might just be that the business climate here is just so fucking inhospitable that even is we gave them free labor, they might not come.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article28563.html

This is all bullshit while your store boughten reps scurry away with millions of your dollars ? OK fine. They have the experise, I ask, the expertise at WHAT ? The best rule us, the best steal from us, the best are destroying us.

Happy now ?

T^T

< Message edited by Termyn8or -- 7/1/2011 8:51:32 PM >

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 8:54:18 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Yeah baby...I have got some fucking change for you.  And I think it is going to be great. 


Oh yeah, so you think its gonna be great, huh? Soooo.... what are you going to be shorting?


You are a pretty smart guy.  That was a more astute question than just about anyone has asked me.  You are waaaaay too fucking bright to be a liberal.  I'm not shorting anything.  A lot of where I make my money is in divorce law and as the economy goes to shit, divorces go up.  Also, I make money on rental income and as the economy goes to shit, more people can rent than buy.  What I am doing is paying off all debt.....credit cards, loans, bills and anything else you can name.  Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity, Crummy, Bachelor, Cavuto, Beck....they all say the same thing; the shit really hits the fan in 2012.  Now you may not listen to these people and you may consider them all to be very partisan but they are all pretty bright.  Are they fear mongering?  It is possible for all of them.............................................................except Cavuto....Forbes too.  So I have also stocked piled a certain amount of food.......a large amount to tell the truth........and ammunition.

Now...for the Joether dipshits and the Julias and the Mystics and other liberal circus acts, let me say this; I have no interest in seeing divorces go up and the loss of home ownership go up because this country FAILS.  The reason why I think the horrific changes that are on the horizon are great is because it is going to take a real catastrophe to kill liberalism and for people to rise up and change this country and demand personal responsibility and criminal accountability.  That's why.

Thanks but I am not a guy, I am a female. I am conservative in certain aspects but less so in others.
I believe in going with the trend, which ever direction it is going and hedging in areas where I can & need to.

As far as your rental income goes... you are expecting the value of your property to decrease further? Are you doing anything to hedge or counteract that decrease?

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 9:52:19 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
FR

Why do you people keep talking about nothing. And I might add that the democrats did just as much. This is fucking stupid.

T^T

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 10:04:37 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Yeah baby...I have got some fucking change for you.  And I think it is going to be great. 


Oh yeah, so you think its gonna be great, huh? Soooo.... what are you going to be shorting?


You are a pretty smart guy.  That was a more astute question than just about anyone has asked me.  You are waaaaay too fucking bright to be a liberal.  I'm not shorting anything.  A lot of where I make my money is in divorce law and as the economy goes to shit, divorces go up.  Also, I make money on rental income and as the economy goes to shit, more people can rent than buy.  What I am doing is paying off all debt.....credit cards, loans, bills and anything else you can name.  Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity, Crummy, Bachelor, Cavuto, Beck....they all say the same thing; the shit really hits the fan in 2012.  Now you may not listen to these people and you may consider them all to be very partisan but they are all pretty bright.  Are they fear mongering?  It is possible for all of them.............................................................except Cavuto....Forbes too.  So I have also stocked piled a certain amount of food.......a large amount to tell the truth........and ammunition.

Now...for the Joether dipshits and the Julias and the Mystics and other liberal circus acts, let me say this; I have no interest in seeing divorces go up and the loss of home ownership go up because this country FAILS.  The reason why I think the horrific changes that are on the horizon are great is because it is going to take a real catastrophe to kill liberalism and for people to rise up and change this country and demand personal responsibility and criminal accountability.  That's why.

Thanks but I am not a guy, I am a female. I am conservative in certain aspects but less so in others.
I believe in going with the trend, which ever direction it is going and hedging in areas where I can & need to.

As far as your rental income goes... you are expecting the value of your property to decrease further? Are you doing anything to hedge or counteract that decrease?


Wow...ummmmmm...will you marry me??? 

I'm not worried about my real estate.  I bought my properties in '97 and '99.  A 5 family house w/5 garages just 2 blocks from the beach was purchased for $130,000.00 and a 7 family with 10 garages 600 yards from the beach was purchased for $218,000.00.  At their apex, the 7 family could have sold for over 1.1 and the five family for over 800k.
I have fixed them up and redecorated and put in granite countertops, new cabinets, new bathrooms with granite walls, 4.5 inch crown moldings, etc. etc. etc.  Consequently, I have not lost much money in rent.  Have the houses depreciated?  Most certainly but nowhere near what I bought them for and what they are mortgaged for.  This is why I tell people that the real estate market is poised for a TOTAL FREE FALL.  If our scumbag president does away with the mortgage interest deduction, real estate values will a plummet faster than a car going off of a cliff.  We actually have a long way to go (a long way to "correct") before we get to the home prices of the mid 90's and God help us if we actually get there.  I definitely do expect to see a further decrease in my house values but I have hedged against that.

As soon as O'scumbag had his conversation with "Joe the Plumber", I knew what I had to do.  I took out a mortgage on one house that covered the mortgage of the other house and I paid off the other house.  This way, if I lost one house, the other house was owned free and clear.  Then I made a concerted effort to pay down the mortgage on the one house and have paid o$50,000.00 in excess of the regular mortgage payments in the past 1.5 years.

So...my advice is that if you have cash coming in, the first thing you do is liquidate all debt.  If you want to invest in something, invest in oil stocks or other energy stocks but I prefer oil first.  The fact is that our traitor of a president will not be allowed to deplete our entire strategic energy reserve even though I honestly believe he would like to.  If you invested in BP after the Deep Water Horizon event, you would be showing a profit now. 

I'm not wild about gold.  It is kind of high and, frankly, if a conservative was elected president and the 16,000 new IRS agents hired by O'scumbag were fired along with maybe 4,000 more and, perhaps, another 50,000 in closed departments, social spending, etc. etc. and a concomitant reduction in corporate taxes, perhaps a total suspension in capital gains taxes and an end to the pension system, which would be replaced by matching 401k's....you could see gold drop to $325.00 per ounce again and if that happened and you were heavy in gold, you would get whip-sawed.

I think silver is a better investment with a great deal more latitude.  BUT...the fact is that you need to get rid of all forms of debt.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 10:22:38 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Where you fail...spectacularly fail is your idiot assertion that I am accurate because "you are willing to screw over the workforce that put you in power to begin with". Wow, man, that was really fucking stupid! It has nothing to do about "fucking over the workforce" man...power to the people and all of your other trite bullshit.


Now wait a sec... that was before I saw the post where you wave your credentials as a thief

Practice your eventual criminal defense somewhere else. And for GOD'S SAKE ... GET A COMPETENT ATTORNEY



_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 10:32:26 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

Where you fail...spectacularly fail is your idiot assertion that I am accurate because "you are willing to screw over the workforce that put you in power to begin with". Wow, man, that was really fucking stupid! It has nothing to do about "fucking over the workforce" man...power to the people and all of your other trite bullshit.


Now wait a sec... that was before I saw the post where you wave your credentials as a thief

Practice your eventual criminal defense somewhere else. And for GOD'S SAKE ... GET A COMPETENT ATTORNEY




You have been revealed a fool.  You ad hominem attacks mean nothing.  You are the typical liberal idiot that has no idea what he is talking about, requires a nanny state thus he argues for more government and tries to be too cute by half rather than address an argument.  You have become as irrelevant as so many other liberals on this board.

Tell me, bright boy, do higher taxes incentivize the private sector?  Or do higher taxes take money out of the economy?  How many private sector jobs does it take to support one public sector job?  So if your scumbag pres hired 16,000 new IRS agents, how many private sector jobs had he have better created to pay for them?  How many private sector jobs has your boy created?  If the government wanted to "create" private sector jobs, how do you think the government would go about doing that?  Would increasing taxes accomplish that goal?

Who is that a picture of...Jerry Garcia?  Are you hiding behind the image of another person because...well...you have no image?

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 11:43:31 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

You have been revealed a fool. You ad hominem attacks mean nothing. You are the typical liberal idiot that has no idea what he is talking about, requires a nanny state thus he argues for more government and tries to be too cute by half rather than address an argument. You have become as irrelevant as so many other liberals on this board.


Oh, I'm sorry Bernie... I stand corrected I was under the impression I was discussing a topic without picking fight with ANYONE and along came some asshole who started name calling and then boasting about his vast knowledge of basically jack shit, but goes with the pathetic lowballing strategy of throwing a failed doctrine hoping that if he parrots it enough times it comes true, just like in a Disney or Jimmy Stewart movie. But if you insist you were attacked first Bernie, enjoy your delusion.
Mummy should have told you that you can't insult people and then expect em to powder your ass.



_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/1/2011 11:56:14 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Who is that a picture of...Jerry Garcia? Are you hiding behind the image of another person because...well...you have no image?


Nope Bambi ... I have a real picture. UNLIKE YOU.
I'm done with you though ... you're just some Dude having conniptions and I've humored you enough


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 12:02:08 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper
quote:

Where you fail...spectacularly fail is your idiot assertion that I am accurate because "you are willing to screw over the workforce that put you in power to begin with". Wow, man, that was really fucking stupid! It has nothing to do about "fucking over the workforce" man...power to the people and all of your other trite bullshit.


Now wait a sec... that was before I saw the post where you wave your credentials as a thief

Practice your eventual criminal defense somewhere else. And for GOD'S SAKE ... GET A COMPETENT ATTORNEY

You have been revealed a fool.  You ad hominem attacks mean nothing.  You are the typical liberal idiot that has no idea what he is talking about, requires a nanny state thus he argues for more government and tries to be too cute by half rather than address an argument.  You have become as irrelevant as so many other liberals on this board.


I've noticed one of your central defenses: insult the other guy, because your arguement is lacking. Usually the insults only go so far, before the Admins step in, and put you on ice for a while. If I were you, I would consider being less of a hostile person, and more of a patient one. But while we are on the topic of 'nanny states', could you properly define the conservative nanny state? It does exist in theory (much like the liberal nanny state). And no, its not the exact opposite of the liberal version. Most people, once they hear the answer nod and say "yeah, that makes perfect sense".

You 'diss' liberals, but seemingly forgot one fine point: Liberals vote TOO. Some of them really do vote for people you DONT want in office, just because you do the same to them. An yes, the current 'crop' of conservatives running for the GOP ticket is laughable at best, and scary at worst.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway
Tell me, bright boy, do higher taxes incentivize the private sector?  Or do higher taxes take money out of the economy?  How many private sector jobs does it take to support one public sector job?  So if your scumbag pres hired 16,000 new IRS agents, how many private sector jobs had he have better created to pay for them?  How many private sector jobs has your boy created?  If the government wanted to "create" private sector jobs, how do you think the government would go about doing that?  Would increasing taxes accomplish that goal?


You have absolutely no idea how federal spending works. Nor how its divided up, who gets what, and what goes where. Do you really believe the money simply vanishs into thin air the moment the accountant gives the 'ok' for it to be spent from federal coffers? Do you know how much $10 Billion in federal spending, buys in US Jobs? About 65,000. The majority of those jobs are.....PRIVATE SECTOR. It must be shocking for someone that spews more insults than a 4th grader; but that really is the truth. Likewise, how many public sector jobs does it take to support one private sector job? Yeah, the opposite of your question. I'm willing to bet you've never stopped and thought about it that way. Surely public sector folks spend money on bills, cloths, food, rent, etc?

The goverment creates private sector jobs every day. The goverment needs products (whether raw material or finished good), and knowledgable persons to handle a whirlwind of tasks, concepts, and machinery. Or are all those people from Boeing REALLY public sector employees in your book? Those folks that load vending machines from Pepsi, are public sector employees? In fact, the $846 Billion Defense budget, pays for quite a chunk of Middle Class America's paychecks. Are they all public sector employees? Seems in your book, they are.....all of them.

An yes, increasing taxes would create/maintain jobs. Otherwise, cutting $10 Billion results in about 65,000 Americans losing their jobs (private, public and those 'down stream' of both). Every $100 Billion would be about 700,000-950,000 Jobs (scale of economics as explained by the CBO a few months back). So, cutting huge swathes of jobs....DURING....a recession, is a good idea to you? Please, by all means, present a rational arguement for how this is a good thing during really high unemployment and very low job growth?

An finally, spare us the petty insults. It does nothing but undermine your arguement(s).

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 12:22:31 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway
Wow...ummmmmm...will you marry me??? 

I'm not worried about my real estate.  I bought my properties in '97 and '99.  A 5 family house w/5 garages just 2 blocks from the beach was purchased for $130,000.00 and a 7 family with 10 garages 600 yards from the beach was purchased for $218,000.00.  At their apex, the 7 family could have sold for over 1.1 and the five family for over 800k.
I have fixed them up and redecorated and put in granite countertops, new cabinets, new bathrooms with granite walls, 4.5 inch crown moldings, etc. etc. etc.  Consequently, I have not lost much money in rent.  Have the houses depreciated?  Most certainly but nowhere near what I bought them for and what they are mortgaged for.  This is why I tell people that the real estate market is poised for a TOTAL FREE FALL.  If our scumbag president does away with the mortgage interest deduction, real estate values will a plummet faster than a car going off of a cliff.  We actually have a long way to go (a long way to "correct") before we get to the home prices of the mid 90's and God help us if we actually get there.  I definitely do expect to see a further decrease in my house values but I have hedged against that.

As soon as O'scumbag had his conversation with "Joe the Plumber", I knew what I had to do.  I took out a mortgage on one house that covered the mortgage of the other house and I paid off the other house.  This way, if I lost one house, the other house was owned free and clear.  Then I made a concerted effort to pay down the mortgage on the one house and have paid o$50,000.00 in excess of the regular mortgage payments in the past 1.5 years.

So...my advice is that if you have cash coming in, the first thing you do is liquidate all debt.  If you want to invest in something, invest in oil stocks or other energy stocks but I prefer oil first.  The fact is that our traitor of a president will not be allowed to deplete our entire strategic energy reserve even though I honestly believe he would like to.  If you invested in BP after the Deep Water Horizon event, you would be showing a profit now. 

I'm not wild about gold.  It is kind of high and, frankly, if a conservative was elected president and the 16,000 new IRS agents hired by O'scumbag were fired along with maybe 4,000 more and, perhaps, another 50,000 in closed departments, social spending, etc. etc. and a concomitant reduction in corporate taxes, perhaps a total suspension in capital gains taxes and an end to the pension system, which would be replaced by matching 401k's....you could see gold drop to $325.00 per ounce again and if that happened and you were heavy in gold, you would get whip-sawed.

I think silver is a better investment with a great deal more latitude.  BUT...the fact is that you need to get rid of all forms of debt.


lol Well, the last time a guy asked me to marry him it was after a great deep throat bj…. I didn’t really take him too seriously tho.
Yeah, I see why the price of the real estate isn’t a concern for you. I like what you did, consolidating the debt onto one property to reduce your risk. I am not a gold bug either. I agree about oil as well.
I forgot all about Joe the Plumber… gee,… I wonder what he is doing now.


_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 7:53:43 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper
quote:

Where you fail...spectacularly fail is your idiot assertion that I am accurate because "you are willing to screw over the workforce that put you in power to begin with". Wow, man, that was really fucking stupid! It has nothing to do about "fucking over the workforce" man...power to the people and all of your other trite bullshit.


Now wait a sec... that was before I saw the post where you wave your credentials as a thief

Practice your eventual criminal defense somewhere else. And for GOD'S SAKE ... GET A COMPETENT ATTORNEY

You have been revealed a fool.  You ad hominem attacks mean nothing.  You are the typical liberal idiot that has no idea what he is talking about, requires a nanny state thus he argues for more government and tries to be too cute by half rather than address an argument.  You have become as irrelevant as so many other liberals on this board.


I've noticed one of your central defenses: insult the other guy, because your arguement is lacking. Usually the insults only go so far, before the Admins step in, and put you on ice for a while. If I were you, I would consider being less of a hostile person, and more of a patient one. But while we are on the topic of 'nanny states', could you properly define the conservative nanny state? It does exist in theory (much like the liberal nanny state). And no, its not the exact opposite of the liberal version. Most people, once they hear the answer nod and say "yeah, that makes perfect sense".

You 'diss' liberals, but seemingly forgot one fine point: Liberals vote TOO. Some of them really do vote for people you DONT want in office, just because you do the same to them. An yes, the current 'crop' of conservatives running for the GOP ticket is laughable at best, and scary at worst.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway
Tell me, bright boy, do higher taxes incentivize the private sector?  Or do higher taxes take money out of the economy?  How many private sector jobs does it take to support one public sector job?  So if your scumbag pres hired 16,000 new IRS agents, how many private sector jobs had he have better created to pay for them?  How many private sector jobs has your boy created?  If the government wanted to "create" private sector jobs, how do you think the government would go about doing that?  Would increasing taxes accomplish that goal?


You have absolutely no idea how federal spending works. Nor how its divided up, who gets what, and what goes where. Do you really believe the money simply vanishs into thin air the moment the accountant gives the 'ok' for it to be spent from federal coffers? Do you know how much $10 Billion in federal spending, buys in US Jobs? About 65,000. The majority of those jobs are.....PRIVATE SECTOR. It must be shocking for someone that spews more insults than a 4th grader; but that really is the truth. Likewise, how many public sector jobs does it take to support one private sector job? Yeah, the opposite of your question. I'm willing to bet you've never stopped and thought about it that way. Surely public sector folks spend money on bills, cloths, food, rent, etc?

The goverment creates private sector jobs every day. The goverment needs products (whether raw material or finished good), and knowledgable persons to handle a whirlwind of tasks, concepts, and machinery. Or are all those people from Boeing REALLY public sector employees in your book? Those folks that load vending machines from Pepsi, are public sector employees? In fact, the $846 Billion Defense budget, pays for quite a chunk of Middle Class America's paychecks. Are they all public sector employees? Seems in your book, they are.....all of them.

An yes, increasing taxes would create/maintain jobs. Otherwise, cutting $10 Billion results in about 65,000 Americans losing their jobs (private, public and those 'down stream' of both). Every $100 Billion would be about 700,000-950,000 Jobs (scale of economics as explained by the CBO a few months back). So, cutting huge swathes of jobs....DURING....a recession, is a good idea to you? Please, by all means, present a rational arguement for how this is a good thing during really high unemployment and very low job growth?

An finally, spare us the petty insults. It does nothing but undermine your arguement(s).


You are absolutely right.  I call you and stern skipper stupid because both of you guys ARE FUCKING STUPID.  In your post you said that raising taxes creates jobs.  Didn't you say that, Dumbo?  Well if that is the case, why were millions of jobs created under Bush?  If raising taxes creates jobs, why didn't O'scumbag raise taxes last year when he consented to an extension of the Bush tax cuts.  If raising taxes creates jobs, why don't have have a 90% tax bracket?

Yes....you two are some of the dumbest people on this board and it is impossible to listen to your idiot drivel and not get frustrated.  Tell me the mechanics of HOW THE GOVERNMENT CREATES PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS THROUGH TAXATION OR ANY OTHER MEANS.  Go ahead, moron...give us your wisdom.  The government can encourage private sector jobs through federal small business loans but that really isn't encouraging business through taxation because the repayment of those loans so result in a profit for America at large.  Right????  So how else do they create jobs?  By cutting taxes. 

I know...go ask that genius, Stern Skipper, he has all the answers.  You dim wits may very well get the America you are hoping for; an America with a 50% tax bracket (but with so many of our earners fleeing the country, I don't know who is going to pay it), an American with a 13% payroll tax (and such a massive spike in unemployment and the payment of workers under the table that the government takes in EVEN LESS MONEY), an America with cap and trade, an America without the mortgage interest deduction, an American with absolutely NO manufacturing base; a socialist America.  That's fine, but it will be a hell on earth.  But I guess when everyone has to live to your standard of failure, you will finally be happy.  Ahoy there, Skipper!! :)

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 8:02:45 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

The goverment creates private sector jobs every day. The goverment needs products (whether raw material or finished good), and knowledgable persons to handle a whirlwind of tasks, concepts, and machinery. Or are all those people from Boeing REALLY public sector employees in your book? Those folks that load vending machines from Pepsi, are public sector employees? In fact, the $846 Billion Defense budget, pays for quite a chunk of Middle Class America's paychecks. Are they all public sector employees? Seems in your book, they are.....all of them.



One last thing to really highlight your rampant and unbridled fucking idiocy.  You said the above, right?  That makes the government a consumer.  And that is great, this country needs consumers.  But the government doesn't turn around and provide a service or make a product that it sells (other than weapons and that is just a drop in the bucket) that keeps the cycle rolling.  So the government pays for those services with what.....fool!  It pays for the things it consumes with TAX DOLLARS.  Your argument is that the larger the government the more servicing the government will need and so the more private sector jobs it will create.  In order for that to be the case, you need some serious fucking imperialism.  The country has to expand, the population has to expand the land mass has to expand and the government continues to expand right along with it.  What YOU are too dumb to understand is that by paying for services through taxation without having any independent means to generate its own money, the government's revenue source is only its extremely overburdened populace.

Dope.

Oh...and now I have to do a postscript.  You know, Joe, the problem with you is that the things you say are SO stupid there is no place that a person can say "ok...I have responded 'nuff said" but your blather is a treasure trove of moronics.

You said that if the government cut taxes that it would cost 65,000 public and private sector jobs.  First, I couldn't care less about 65,000 PUBLIC sector jobs lost.  Since Obama's rampant expansion of government, there needs to be about 200,000 government lay offs.  Since your cocksucker has bee president, what have the job figures been, by the way?  400,000 new unemployment claims almost every week.  Got it?  Do you watch the news?  Tell me your source for 65,000 (or any portion thereof) of private sector jobs that would be lost.  You have some data on that?  Your argument centers on the thesis that if the government cut taxes, the government would not be able to pay for its services and so the private sector jobs that cater to these services would be lost BECAUSE the government is their sole client.

You are a fool.  You and Skippy are the kind of dumb idealogues that, even in a face to face discussion on these matters, people would look at you and tell you that you are too stupid to talk to.


< Message edited by lockedaway -- 7/2/2011 8:14:01 AM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 10:33:01 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Only the ignorant babblers devoid of any fact would lie and tell you that there are more government employees under Obama, when in fact there are less.

While there was a temporary spike for the census, the numbers are down from Ws day. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 3:19:31 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Only the ignorant babblers devoid of any fact would lie and tell you that there are more government employees under Obama, when in fact there are less.

While there was a temporary spike for the census, the numbers are down from Ws day. 


Under Obama, the private sector has shed some 2.9 million jobs while the federal government has grown by 40,000 (after growing massively, the federal workforce shrank throughout the summer). Total government jobs, however, shrank by 357,000 jobs, mainly because of cuts at the state and local levels. Now, we can’t really compare these numbers, because we have eight years of Bush data and only two years of Obama data. That’s why the chart below looks at the average monthly job creation under each president. There were more jobs created monthly under President Bush than under President Obama. Overall, most of the net jobs created under Bush were created in the government; many private sector jobs have been destroyed under Obama; and the number of government jobs has decreased, even though federal employment has grown. Archive


My Goodness....Messiah Obama is a failure and so are his followers.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 3:24:48 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Way to isolate a monthly fluctuation.

Here's the complete overview on private jobs.


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 7:02:54 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
AHEM ! ! !

To the OP period.

Where are ANY anti-outsourcing bills ?

T^T

(in reply to defiantbadgirl)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/2/2011 10:21:10 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
It takes a real piece of shit to post a chart and omit the article that explains the chart and all of the other corresponding charts in the piece.  Isn't that right, Musicmystery?  Wouldn't you say that someone who does that is a real misleading piece of shit?  Well for those of you that would like the whole article and not be mislead, here is the graph posted by Musicmystery and all of the other information he decided to leave out:

Bush vs. Obama: Total Private Sector Employment Posted on Saturday, April 2, 2011 by Sean Patrick Hazlett   [/link]Change in Total Private Employment (in thousands), Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
[link=http://reflectionsofarationalrepublican.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/liberal-total-private-jobs-worldview1.jpg]Some left-leaning sites have pointed to the chart above [the chart posted by Music Mystery] as a sign that Obama’s economic policies are a smashing success  because total private sector employment has consistently increased in the last thirteen months. However, the problem with this chart is that it misleadingly shows Bush’s last year in office, his worst year, as a foil to Obama’s first two years and three months in office. This selective presentation of the data makes Bush’s record look abysmal compared to President Obama’s numbers. However, the unemployment rate is currently a whopping 8.8% and it still has not declined to President Bush’s 7.3% high in December 2008. [char
t that will not copy here] [link=http://reflectionsofarationalrepublican.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/bush-vs-obama-unemployment.jpg]Unemployment Rate, Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Furthermore, if one includes President Bush’s entire record, it looks far better than President Obama’s record to date. Over President Bush’s entire presidency, the private sector created a net 188,000 jobs (not including January 2001 data). Surprisingly, this number includes the 3.78 million private sector jobs lost in 2008. [chart that will not copy here] [/link]Change in Total Private Employment (in thousands), Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics In contrast, under President Obama’s administration, the private sector lost a net 3.25 million private sector jobs. The point of this argument is not to assess blame on either administration’s policy. It simply puts the left’s claims in perspective. For every job that the private sector created under George W. Bush, the private sector eliminated 17.3 jobs under Barack Obama. While the private sector job outlook has certainly improved, the economy still must create 3.25 million private sector jobs to break even. Until then, it is disingenuous for the left to claim that President Obama’s economic policies are a resounding success.

Try as I might, the charts and the entire article would not copy here.  Here is the cite: [link=http://reflectionsofarationalrepublican.com/2011/04/02/bush-vs-obama-total-private-sector-employment/]http://reflectionsofarationalrepublican.com/2011/04/02/bush-vs-obama-total-private-sector-employment/


You have the dicta from the article above.  The charts are very interesting too and they are only a click away. But at least now you have the WHOLE story and the explanation of the chart posted by Musicmystery.


< Message edited by lockedaway -- 7/2/2011 11:14:18 PM >

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills - 7/3/2011 1:10:37 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
FR

Look if you want to compare jobs, why not compare jobs that really produce a saleable product, which could offset the trade deficit ? Can't do it huh.

T^T

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: republican anti-outsourcing jobs bills Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.113