Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:25:15 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline 		Yeah people make all sorts of assumptions and most don't bother to check out whether it's true.

Careful about letting her sleep in, people will think you've gone soft


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:33:25 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

Careful about letting her sleep in, people will think you've gone soft

Hey!

That a riff off my "Penis Map" thread ....? 

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:37:09 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DavidLee44UK

imperatix

people start threads for all sorts reasons

if you want to talk about tea you dont talk about coffee

its firms point you wanna make a point start a thread

and some women are gold diggers look at all the bimbos in uk who purposively go after footballers

remember watching a tv prog where a bunch women said they only go out with footballers

look at posh spice she was only in spice girls because was a fabricated band and since has been seen and ridden on coat tails of beckham brand

but then it does make sense for him to been with a pretty (cough) girl on his arm


A study that says that 65% of women would not get married if they were unemployed doesn't exactly inspire the question "are women gold diggers" to me.

(in reply to DavidLee44UK)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:38:26 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

Careful about letting her sleep in, people will think you've gone soft

Hey!

That a riff off my "Penis Map" thread ....? 

Firm


that depends, what answer will keep me from getting my ass beat?


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:41:30 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

I fully comprehend the fact that you thought it would be more interesting to discuss women being gold diggers than it would be to discuss that the majority of women expect to live in two income households when they are married.
Well, if he did think that, he'd pretty much be right, don't you think? I mean really, how many pages do you think the "two-income" thread would go?


I guess I just honestly can't comprehend how a study that says that the vast majority of women expect to have a marriage where both they and their spouse work would make someone question whether women are gold diggers unless the idea of women gold diggers was so strongly ingrained in their mind that it colors their perception.

The percentage of women who would marry an unemployed man is more than double the difference between women who would not marry an unemployed man vs. women who would not get married if they were unemployed themselves.

It blows my mind that anyone could read that article and think that it would support that women marry solely for financial advantage.

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:42:51 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

that depends, what answer will keep me from getting my ass beat?

If I were single ....?  Probably none .

But seeing as how I'm not, you're likely safe either way.

btw, I've answered your question about penis sizes in Texas, in the other thread.  Twice!

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:45:10 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

that depends, what answer will keep me from getting my ass beat?

If I were single ....?  Probably none .

But seeing as how I'm not, you're likely safe either way.

btw, I've answered your question about penis sizes in Texas, in the other thread.  Twice!

Firm



Likely safe? In any case I'm glad you aren't single.

Geez you're an impatient one aren't you?


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:48:11 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

Geez you're an impatient one aren't you?

Probably goes along with the small penis ...

Firm

(that oughta give imperatrixx gist for her fantasies ...)


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:50:07 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline 		<--------glad I wasn't drinking coffee when I read that. 

_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:54:02 AM   
DavidLee44UK


Posts: 436
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx


quote:

ORIGINAL: DavidLee44UK

imperatix

people start threads for all sorts reasons

if you want to talk about tea you dont talk about coffee

its firms point you wanna make a point start a thread

and some women are gold diggers look at all the bimbos in uk who purposively go after footballers

remember watching a tv prog where a bunch women said they only go out with footballers

look at posh spice she was only in spice girls because was a fabricated band and since has been seen and ridden on coat tails of beckham brand

but then it does make sense for him to been with a pretty (cough) girl on his arm


A study that says that 65% of women would not get married if they were unemployed doesn't exactly inspire the question "are women gold diggers" to me.



lol imperatix YOU DIDNT START THREAD

as i said in my previous thread about split testing threads/posts/videos which insight negative and positive comments more successful

and if we all thought same life would be boring

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 7:57:54 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline 		so what if she didnt start the thread?  she has just as much right to post here as any PRAT does.

thats the beauty of CMChat... anyone, regardless,  has the right to post ANYWHERE.

(sometimes, to the detriment of the venue)

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to DavidLee44UK)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 8:11:01 AM   
HeatherMcLeather


Posts: 2559
Joined: 5/21/2011
From: The dog house
Status: offline
quote:

I guess I just honestly can't comprehend how a study that says that the vast majority of women expect to have a marriage where both they and their spouse work would make someone question whether women are gold diggers unless the idea of women gold diggers was so strongly ingrained in their mind that it colors their perception.
I think he already explained that quite adequately. He's trolling.

quote:

Maybe "the OP's issues" is that he thought it would be an interesting, thought-provoking, and perhaps mayhem filled thread.

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 8:44:34 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DavidLee44UK

lol imperatix YOU DIDNT START THREAD

as i said in my previous thread about split testing threads/posts/videos which insight negative and positive comments more successful

and if we all thought same life would be boring



...

i never said i started the thread, i never said everyone should all think the same, and i seriously need an english translation of that middle sentence because i have no fucking idea what you are trying to express with it.

(in reply to DavidLee44UK)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 8:45:44 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

I guess I just honestly can't comprehend how a study that says that the vast majority of women expect to have a marriage where both they and their spouse work would make someone question whether women are gold diggers unless the idea of women gold diggers was so strongly ingrained in their mind that it colors their perception.
I think he already explained that quite adequately. He's trolling.

quote:

Maybe "the OP's issues" is that he thought it would be an interesting, thought-provoking, and perhaps mayhem filled thread.



heh yeah probably.

OH LOOK A STUDY SAID THAT MOST WOMEN WOULD NOT GET MARRIED IF THEY DIDN'T HAVE A JOB I WONDER IF THAT MAKES THEM GOLD DIGGERS

(in reply to HeatherMcLeather)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 8:45:46 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline 		good luck with THAT....

ETA: in re: to that 'middle sentence' bit

< Message edited by GreedyTop -- 7/9/2011 8:46:55 AM >

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 9:11:50 AM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline 		Women should be in the kitchen baking pie, wearing lingerie, putting together pretty outfits, suckling babies, having sex with their man, cleaning the house, going to PTA meeting, working on the flower bed or buying stuff at the grocery store, so they aren't supposed to work for money. So, obviously they should be looking for an employed man. It is just the nature of things.

(in reply to GreedyTop)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 9:12:57 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline 		Channeling Eric Cartman this morning, are we?

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to NeedToUseYou)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 9:15:03 AM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Channeling Eric Cartman this morning, are we?


Don't question me woman, you need to RESPECT MY AUTHORITY!

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 9:16:04 AM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

That's not work! that's a self-supporting hobby.


Ah ... kinda like a VERY dark lemonade stand, eh?



_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? - 7/9/2011 9:17:36 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou

Women should be in the kitchen baking pie, wearing lingerie, putting together pretty outfits, suckling babies, having sex with their man, cleaning the house, going to PTA meeting, working on the flower bed or buying stuff at the grocery store, so they aren't supposed to work for money. So, obviously they should be looking for an employed man. It is just the nature of things.


Exactly!!!!  BUT...not only does the man have to be employed, he needs to be pulling down around $250,000 per year as well.  He also had better be ready to lose 50% of his assets and 55% of his income if that marriage ends after the 15 year mark.

< Message edited by lockedaway -- 7/9/2011 9:18:03 AM >

(in reply to NeedToUseYou)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Women: Realistic or Gold Diggers? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094