Hisprettybaby
Posts: 781
Joined: 4/13/2011 From: Bellingham, WA U.S.A. Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PainObjectForUse I read a post somewhere online, where a member, or former member made a peculiar statement: - " there is always a level of fake in the submissive's intentions! " I was wondering what people make of this? I'm not sure I understand what you're driving at. It's true that a person would not submit if s/he was not getting something out of it. I mean, when I submit to Daddy, I enjoy the way it makes me feel. It makes me feel good. Feeling good = my payback. But, by the same token, he gets a payback from being Dominant too. He loves the power, the control, and how it makes him feel. The power/control and how it makes him feel = his payback. I don't think anyone Dominates or submits because they hate it. Do they? I mean, I've never heard either a Dominant or submissive say they do what they do because they hate it and it makes them feel crappy. Now, if someone told me that, then that would be fake in my mind. They do it because they want to. Actual slavery is against the law, at least in this country, so even those s-types who call themselves slaves are doing it because they want to. ~edited to add~ For that matter, Daddy considers my submission as a gift to him. BUT I also consider his Dominance of me a gift from him to me. His Dominance allows me to submit to him, and my submission allows him to Dominate me. But, on the other hand, are they really gifts at all? It's more like his Dominance and my submission complement each other. ~Hisprettybaby~
< Message edited by Hisprettybaby -- 7/17/2011 5:06:34 PM >
|