Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 12:33:55 PM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

When I was young I used to read the "Tales from the Crypt" graphic novel. In there was a story that began mere seconds after an obsessive compulsive man had just murdered another man in his own home. The victim had served him dinner and given him a tour of his house, so all throughout the place he had left his finger prints on many things including silverware and antiques.

He decided that he had to clean everything he had touched before the police arrived, so he spent all night cleaning so obsessively that the following morning the cops arrived to find him still at the crime scene, engrossed to the point of ignoring their presence entirely. By the end of the story, as the cops were leading him out into the squad car he stopped, took a napkin out of his pocket and cleaned the very last thing: the doorknob. Then, smiling madly he gave the door a triumphant slam and followed the policeman off to jail.

The crux of the story was that his paranoia had driven him so mad that he became obsessed with the task itself and lost sight of why he was doing it in the first place.


First, let me give some quotes from Mitch McConnell:

"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for Obama to be a one-term president."

and

"I refuse to help Obama get reelected by marching republicans into a position where we have co-ownership of a bad economy"

And here's a quote from Donald Trump just the other day, suggesting that the GOP should let the default happen so that Obama won't get elected:

"Frankly the Republicans would be crazy unless they get 100 percent of the deal that they want right now to make any deal"


"When it comes time to default, they’re not going to remember any of the Republicans' names. They are going to remember in history books one name, and that’s Obama."

Now why do I include Donald Trump even though he's not a political player? One, because I do believe that his approach exemplifies the strategy of the Republican party to an extent and two, because Fox News, an important branch of the republican party has decided for some reason to give him a platform on-air to spew his verbal waste.

The START treaty. The Debt Ceiling. Do you know what these things have in common? They used to be pretty much routine and now they're not. The people in the GOP voted 19 times to raise the debt ceiling under Bush. Why is it so hard now?

Because the Republicans have lost sight completely of their vow to serve the country. The reason for their being has become to oppose Obama on everything. EVERYTHING. And they are willing to let us go into default, something that has never happened before, they are willing to hold the world economy hostage to stop Obama from doing anything that might help him in 2012. They are more worried about Obama getting elected than the welfare of the American people.


The obsessive man from the story is the GOP. The "task" is complete shutdown of Obama. They are so obessed that when the default leads us away in to the squad car, perhaps they'll be smiling madly too.






I have not read most of the replies on this thread, so if this idea was said once, my apologies for not reading each and every reply.  I get what you're saying though, Violet.

While you used Tales of the Crypt (I used to watch that show when it was on TV...a great show to watch just before you're going to sleep! ), but the whole topic reminded me of something I read on facebook....

"I could end the deficit problems in 5 minutes", Warren Buffett told CNBC, "You just pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election"

When I read that, I thought to myself, boy that would sure put an end to political games and make them ALL do the job we voted them in to do! 





_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to VioletGray)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 12:34:05 PM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

Unlike some people, who can say in one post that they want to stop illegal immigration and say in the next that they really don't give a fuck that they're one of the people encouraging illegal immigration by hiring them,


Who might that be?


That would be lockedaway.


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Schools? Talk to their parents first. Universal health care? You mean health care that keeps you waiting for knee replacements for 18 months? Cancer treatment/diagonses for 3-6 months? No thanks.


Yes, I mean the health care that gives people knee replacements in 18 months instead of never.

I don't think people realize that even in countries with national healthcare, private healthcare is still an option and quite a few people have it, myself included.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 12:36:17 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Nope, but apparently there's a few people in the higher levels of the American military who feel that they do need to justify the sinecures they've received from NATO since the collapse of the Warsaw pact...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 12:39:36 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

Unlike some people, who can say in one post that they want to stop illegal immigration and say in the next that they really don't give a fuck that they're one of the people encouraging illegal immigration by hiring them,


Who might that be?


That would be lockedaway.

If so, then you are right in condemning it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Schools? Talk to their parents first. Universal health care? You mean health care that keeps you waiting for knee replacements for 18 months? Cancer treatment/diagonses for 3-6 months? No thanks.


Yes, I mean the health care that gives people knee replacements in 18 months instead of never. I dont know where that would be.

I don't think people realize that even in countries with national healthcare, private healthcare is still an option and quite a few people have it, myself included. Yeah, so like parents who feel the need to send their kids to private school because the system doesnt work, those with "not so Universal as claimed" healthcare can pay twice




_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 12:41:59 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx
Yes, I mean the health care that gives people knee replacements in 18 months instead of never. I dont know where that would be.



The UK. France and Germany have much faster turnarounds.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 12:54:59 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Longest wait in ontario for knee replacement surgery is from 69 to 270 days,
For hip replacement, its from 92 days to 218
I do realise this is government figures, and that wait times are different depending on which province and how far from civilisation you are, but it has improved, and still in under a year. There was a problem, there is still a problem, but even granny at 98 is able to get a hip replacement. Without having to go thru her insurance company, she pays extra for a private room and her tv and phone....
My hysterectomy was sposed to take up to six months, I had it done within ten weeks.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 1:02:45 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

Unlike some people, who can say in one post that they want to stop illegal immigration and say in the next that they really don't give a fuck that they're one of the people encouraging illegal immigration by hiring them,


Who might that be?


That would be lockedaway.


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Schools? Talk to their parents first. Universal health care? You mean health care that keeps you waiting for knee replacements for 18 months? Cancer treatment/diagonses for 3-6 months? No thanks.


Yes, I mean the health care that gives people knee replacements in 18 months instead of never.

I don't think people realize that even in countries with national healthcare, private healthcare is still an option and quite a few people have it, myself included.


LOLOLOLOL are you sniping at me you little fucker?  I thought you were going to bed or something.  Typical, sneaky-ass lib.

< Message edited by lockedaway -- 7/28/2011 1:03:20 PM >

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 1:04:30 PM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
naw bro i just said it was late. lol

and i already called you out for it like hours ago, he just asked who i was referring to.

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 1:05:05 PM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

naw bro i just said it was late. lol

and i already called you out for it like hours ago, he just asked who i was referring to.


OH.......well.....alright then.

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 1:23:35 PM   
Dominatist9


Posts: 7
Joined: 11/16/2010
Status: offline
Oops


< Message edited by Dominatist9 -- 7/28/2011 1:26:06 PM >

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 1:39:16 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dominatist9


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: housesub4you

I have to agree, Hell Reagan was more liberal the Obama. 

The problem is the right has gone so extreme to the right that even a moderate conservative is considered a "liberal"


My god, you have no clue what youre talking about. Name a few policies of Reagans that are more liberal than Blowboys.

Reagan funded a defense build up not as a conservative like paying for it but as what we'd always been told as a deficit-spending, liberal Keynesian.translate to English please.

He raised payroll taxes (tripled) to sustain that 'liberal' bastion called survival...er soc. sec., in the famous 'reform' that has since been spent by congress. .not even close to tripling, and actually paying for a program is not the bastion of liberals. And of course Congress hasnt spent any Social Security money, they have BORROWED money for their profligate spending, the source is irrelevant.


Reagan very 'liberally' raised taxes three times, the payroll again later and raised the 'conservative' bastion of incentive in a so-called free market...the capital gains tax while very liberally eliminating scores of unproductive tax avoidance in the 86 'reform.' .lol he also reduced the rates when he reformed the tax system, not at all liberal. If you want to argue that supply side economics as a whole was a "liberal" policy just go away now, youre a joke. You are also incorrect, he did not raise capital gains taxes he cut them in his first year or so in office and tried 2 or 3 more times to reduce them further but couldnt get it past the Dem controlled Congress.
Reagan very liberally pulled out of Lebanon not to get bogged down in war. I mean you just know how weak liberals are on 'defense ?'.As blowboy has proven, national defense is not primarily a party/ideology issue, and it was even less so then. However, it might help if you actually understood the Lebanon situation and Congress' actions that precipitated a partial withdrawal.


Now Obama, has NOT raised any payroll, income or cap gains tax..no. he just wants to borrow the money and inflate the currency...a tax on everyone.
Obama has lowered the payroll tax .a temporary gimmick. You cant permanently lower taxes on a system that was already headed to bankruptcy. Dont be an idiot.
and the repubs want it to go back up.

That's right kinkroids, you 'don't raise MY tax say the great fiscal conservatives who then want Obama's payroll tax reduction to expire.

Now that's chutzpah. Tried to but only on those over $250,000, and failed that liberal test. Obama is truly reforming soc. sec but is willing to 'conservatively' consider actually actually cutting long term.

One could go on but for now, I rest my case. .good thing, because you didnt even come close to making one.





If this is the quality of all 6 of your posts, dont bother increasing the total.

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 7/28/2011 1:42:59 PM >


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Dominatist9)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 3:58:00 PM   
housesub4you


Posts: 1879
Joined: 4/2/2008
Status: offline
So according to you Reagan didn't understand what he was doing as well as you seem to think you do.  Read the Bloomberg article below where Old Ronnie (a past union president, a job every conservative wants) 
He is quoted  saying everyone needs to pay their fair share, something every teabagger understands.  He saved Social Security, another huge conservative ideal


Reagan’s biggest deficit came in 1983 when it reached 6 percent of the gross domestic product -- about two-thirds the size of the shortfalls the government has run in each of the past three years.

The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, then criticized as the largest tax increase in history, scaled back corporate tax breaks, increased unemployment-insurance levies, and raised excise taxes on cigarettes, among other changes. “The goal is simple and just: to see to it that everyone pays his fair share,” Reagan said in August 1982. He predicted the tax increase would help the economy because it would reduce the deficit, which he said would lead to lower interest rates. Reagan later signed the Highway Revenue Act of 1982, which temporarily doubled the gasoline tax. Both measures came as millions struggled with the 1981-1982 recession, when the jobless rate was stuck at about 10 percent for almost a year. Undercutting the Argument “That put the lie to the current arguments of Republicans that the economy is too weak to bear a tax increase” because “the next year 3.5 million jobs were created,” said Stockman, who says tax increases are now needed to help reduce the deficit. “When the Republicans rhetorically say now, ‘Who would raise taxes in a recession?’ the answer is Ronald Reagan.”

The following year came the Social Security Amendments of 1983, which was designed to head off the program’s insolvency. It raised the Social Security payroll tax and, for the first time, began taxing the benefit checks of wealthier seniors. The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 raised the estate tax, cut more business tax breaks and boosted taxes on distilled spirits, among other items.

A review of Reagan’s budget requests to Congress shows his administration expected those and a handful of smaller levies to raise about $1 trillion between 1983 and 1992. A 2006 Treasury Department report shows that Reagan’s tax increases now would bring in about $300 billion a year, if the increases were measured against today’s economy. Those higher taxes replaced about half the revenue lost to the Treasury with the 1981 cuts, according to Reagan’s budget documents. ‘


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 4:11:23 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: housesub4you

So according to you Reagan didn't understand what he was doing as well as you seem to think you do. 


I have no clue what this sentence means, it sounds like Chevy Chase in Caddyshack.

As far as the rest of the post goes, it seems to fail to mention that TEFRA 1982 was a DEMOCRATIC BILL that Reagan strongly objected to, and agreed to sign ONLY IF IT CONTAINED 3:1 SPENDING CUTS VS TAX INCREASES. Not long after he vetoed another spending bill and the Democrats overrode the veto.

The liberal attempts to lay claim to Reagan as a tax increaser are ludicrous.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to housesub4you)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 4:16:46 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Four years later, then-budget director David Stockman, however, stated that Congress substantially upheld its end of the bargain, and cites the Administration's failure to identify management savings and its resistance to defense spending cuts as the key impediments to greater outlay savings.

Once again, you lose take off your pants, he raised taxes and did not reduce the spending. 

Yanno, Star Wars!!!!

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 7/28/2011 4:18:14 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/29/2011 4:50:29 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Has Wilbur paid Lucy yet?
She actually took that "3 to 1 Norwegian nutcase is a Mooslim" bet, didn't she?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/29/2011 5:20:08 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Nah I said I didnt trust him to tell me the truth let alone to actually gamble with him.
my loss, or not,LMAO
I could have made money on him wriggling out of his prediction tho:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/29/2011 6:13:40 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
quote:

Reagan’s Error

July 26, 2011 11:00 A.M. By Yuval Levin  

In making his case for tax increases last night, President Obama described past deals in which Democrats promised spending cuts in return for tax increases, and said:


The first time a deal passed, a predecessor of mine made the case for a balanced approach by saying this: “Would you rather reduce deficits and interest rates by raising revenue from those who are not now paying their fair share, or would you rather accept larger budget deficits, higher interest rates, and higher unemployment? And I think I know your answer.” Those words were spoken by Ronald Reagan. But today, many Republicans in the House refuse to consider this kind of balanced approach.


Well, yes, those words were spoken by Ronald Reagan (in August of 1982) in reference to TEFRA—the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act—which congressional Democrats promised would involve a ratio of $3 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax increases (which they said would consist only of closing loopholes). TEFRA passed later that year, and the tax increases certainly happened but, as Reagan later put it in his autobiography, “the Democrats reneged on their pledge and we never got those cuts.”  

TEFRA was one of Reagan’s great regrets about his time in the White House, and should serve as a warning to Republicans contemplating similar grand bargains. Obama’s reference to it only highlights the fact that he tried to pull off something much like TEFRA. Luckily, he appears to have failed.


So Reagans greatest error was trusting Democrats to live up to their promises


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/29/2011 6:22:52 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
No, the biggest error as pointed out by his own people was that St. Wrinklemeat didnt live up to his, not even a little. (I imagine the alzheimers made him forget them).

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/29/2011 6:24:27 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
I could have made money on him wriggling out of his prediction tho:)

Come off it: who'd be fool enough to take that bet?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/29/2011 6:25:50 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, come payoff time he goes off in pstd land, having flashbacks from treating paper burns as a medic in Ft. Collins, Colorado. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109