Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 8:54:42 AM   
housesub4you


Posts: 1879
Joined: 4/2/2008
Status: offline
I have to agree, Hell Reagan was more liberal the Obama. 

The problem is the right has gone so extreme to the right that even a moderate conservative is considered a "liberal"

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 8:55:58 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: housesub4you

I have to agree, Hell Reagan was more liberal the Obama. 

The problem is the right has gone so extreme to the right that even a moderate conservative is considered a "liberal"


My god, you have no clue what youre talking about. Name a few policies of Reagans that are more liberal than Blowboys.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to housesub4you)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 8:56:16 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: housesub4you
The problem is the right has gone so extreme to the right that even a moderate conservative is considered a "liberal"


Pretty much. And the world is leaving us behind.

(in reply to housesub4you)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 8:57:10 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

Seriously? Rants aren't the style of conservatives? Have you read lockedaway's posts? Like the one where I was talking about a working parent trying to support a kid on a low salary and his direct response to me was a few paragraphs ranting about welfare? Or the one where slavemike said he was on disability and his response was to tell him how much he hates him and he's a piece of shit liberal who doesn't deserve disability?

You're actually going to try to say that?


Yes. There is a huge difference between a "rant" and detailed rebuttal of specious posts.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 8:58:44 AM   
housesub4you


Posts: 1879
Joined: 4/2/2008
Status: offline
Jeez  raising taxes on the wealthy for one, 

But hell at least you keep an open mind  One can tell by your cheap degrading remarks

he entered office as an ideologue who promised a conservative revolution, vowing to slash the size of government, radically scale back entitlements, and deploy the powers of the presidency in pursuit of Reagan's presidency doesn't yield the seamlessly conservative record being peddled today.

Federal government expanded on his watch. The conservative desire to outlaw abortion was never seriously pursued. Reagan broke with the hardliners in his administration and compromised with the Soviets on arms control. His assault on entitlements never materialized; instead he saved Social Security in 1983. And he repeatedly ignored the fundamental conservative dogma that taxes should never be raised.
socially and culturally conservative goals. That he essentially failed in this mission hasn't stopped partisan biographers from pretending otherwise.




< Message edited by housesub4you -- 7/28/2011 9:03:14 AM >

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 8:59:56 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Yes. There is a huge difference between a "rant" and detailed rebuttal of specious posts.


I completely agree. A rebuttal of a post generally replies to the topic being discussed in the post. For example (totally hypothetically of course) a rebuttal to a post about parents who earn low wages would contain something about parents, wage earners, or both.

Replying to a post about parents who earn low wages with LOL YEAH WHY DONT WE JUST GIVE EVERYONE ON WELFARE CARS (I'm not even kidding here) is not a rebuttal. It's a rant.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:01:10 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: housesub4you

Jeez  raising taxes on the wealthy for one, 

But hell at least you keep an open mind  One can tell by your cheap degrading remarks



http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128303672

LULZ RAGAN LIKED TEH MEXICUNZ VOTE HIM OUT

(in reply to housesub4you)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:05:44 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Yes. There is a huge difference between a "rant" and detailed rebuttal of specious posts.


Thank you Willbe!  Hey Imperatrixx, "total facial LaFleur!"  What movie is that from, Imp?  Anyway, Imperatrixx, you argue in favor of social engineering.  I argue consistently against it.  Your post about how difficult it is to raise a child was meaningless.  Everyone knows it is hard and no one says otherwise.  The point (and again, with libs you have to be redundant in the extreme) is how much should the top 50% subsidize the bottom 50%?  Jesus, Imp, the issue has been the same all along.

You admitted that O'scumbag isn't liberal enough.  No...for you he is not because you need the entitlement.  You need the cradle to grave services.  You are in the class of people that benefits from a nanny state.  I am in the class of people that ends up enslaved by the underclass.  Ooops!  I guess this is the perfect time for me to say--ONCE AGAIN--that we need a flat tax and a federal sales tax or, perhaps, a VAT tax as MM argues for.  Oooops!  I guess this is a perfect time for me to say--ONCE AGAIN--that if you want the entitlement, you have to pay for it; Flat Tax and Fed Sales Tax. 

There now...is it clear to you?

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:17:47 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
Bitch, I don't even live in the US anymore.

I can say 100% that the social justice I advocate for the US will in absolutely no fucking way benefit me financially.

Unlike some people, who can say in one post that they want to stop illegal immigration and say in the next that they really don't give a fuck that they're one of the people encouraging illegal immigration by hiring them, I'm actually trying to have some principles here, rather than pick and choose when to suck a country dry based on how it affects my bottom line.

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:22:55 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

Bitch, I don't even live in the US anymore.

I can say 100% that the social justice I advocate for the US will in absolutely no fucking way benefit me financially.

Unlike some people, who can say in one post that they want to stop illegal immigration and say in the next that they really don't give a fuck that they're one of the people encouraging illegal immigration by hiring them, I'm actually trying to have some principles here, rather than pick and choose when to suck a country dry based on how it affects my bottom line.


HAHAHAHAHAAH...that was too funny.  "Biiitch!"  Straighten your wrist when you call me that, boy!

If it is all of no benefit to you, why the fuck to you endlessly post about it and support O'fuckface?  Go live in your bastion of liberalism and enjoy it.  If you don't have a dog in the fight, why waste the time of those that do????

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:31:34 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

HAHAHAHAHAAH...that was too funny.  "Biiitch!"  Straighten your wrist when you call me that, boy!

If it is all of no benefit to you, why the fuck to you endlessly post about it and support O'fuckface?  Go live in your bastion of liberalism and enjoy it.  If you don't have a dog in the fight, why waste the time of those that do????



Hookah please.

lol.

If you can't understand why someone would support social justice that doesn't benefit them personally, I can't explain it to you. Maybe you'd tell some of the people who went down to march in Mississippi fuck off, what are you white people doing here, don't you know it's not your problem?

I do have a dog in this fight. That dog is not Obama. Not by any stretch of the imagination.

I know it's shocking to see someone's asking "is this right?" rather than "what's in it for me?" and it might warp your entire worldview that liberals are just greedy bastards trying to get you to pay for them, but that's just how it is sometimes.

I will say I'm fucking grateful to live in my bastion of liberalism. I do have issues with the country I'm living in now, it's by no stretch of the imagination perfect, and some things, like freedom of speech, I cede to the US as being superior. But my bastion of liberalism has national health care, a minimum wage twice the one in the US, government mandated paid leave for employees, and yet somehow it's not teetering on the edge of default to China.

How dare I want the same for the country that will always be "home" in my heart, right?

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:38:24 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

If you can't understand why someone would support social justice that doesn't benefit them personally, I can't explain it to you. Maybe you'd tell some of the people who went down to march in Mississippi fuck off, what are you white people doing here, don't you know it's not your problem?
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

HAHAHAHAHAAH...that was too funny.  "Biiitch!"  Straighten your wrist when you call me that, boy!

If it is all of no benefit to you, why the fuck to you endlessly post about it and support O'fuckface?  Go live in your bastion of liberalism and enjoy it.  If you don't have a dog in the fight, why waste the time of those that do????



Hookah please.

lol.

If you can't understand why someone would support social justice that doesn't benefit them personally, I can't explain it to you. Maybe you'd tell some of the people who went down to march in Mississippi fuck off, what are you white people doing here, don't you know it's not your problem?

I do have a dog in this fight. That dog is not Obama. Not by any stretch of the imagination.

I know it's shocking to see someone's asking "is this right?" rather than "what's in it for me?" and it might warp your entire worldview that liberals are just greedy bastards trying to get you to pay for them, but that's just how it is sometimes.

I will say I'm fucking grateful to live in my bastion of liberalism. I do have issues with the country I'm living in now, it's by no stretch of the imagination perfect, and some things, like freedom of speech, I cede to the US as being superior. But my bastion of liberalism has national health care, a minimum wage twice the one in the US, government mandated paid leave for employees, and yet somehow it's not teetering on the edge of default to China.

How dare I want the same for the country that will always be "home" in my heart, right?


Congratulations!!!!  What is in bold face is your idiot statement of the day.  Only a fucking moron would use a completely subjective label like "social justice".  Nice work, Imp. 

You know what social justice is?  A level playing field where people enjoy the same opportunities, applications under the law and tax liabilities.  The problem with you is that in a truly FAIR system...........you get FUCKED.  You don't compete.  You don't excel.  Well...that's too fucking bad for you, Imp.  Get a little more skin in the game and you won't need so much subsidizing.

You know what social justice is NOT?  Social Justice is not burdening a class of people with the support of a mentally and physically healthy underclass.  Got it?

< Message edited by lockedaway -- 7/28/2011 9:39:10 AM >

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:41:39 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway
You know what social justice is NOT?  Social Justice is not burdening a class of people with the support of a mentally and physically healthy underclass.  Got it?


Get some proper schools for the poor and universal healthcare for everyone and then you can call your underclass mentally and physically healthy bro.

Yeah everyone has the same opportunities in that level playing field.

< Message edited by imperatrixx -- 7/28/2011 9:44:09 AM >

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:46:43 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway
You know what social justice is NOT?  Social Justice is not burdening a class of people with the support of a mentally and physically healthy underclass.  Got it?


Get some proper schools for the poor and universal healthcare for everyone and then you can call your underclass mentally and physically healthy bro.

Yeah everyone has the same opportunities in that level playing field.


Tell me which schools in the U.S. are not "proper" BRO.  Go on.  I have lived all over the U.S. and haven't found an IMPROPER school so far so go ahead and give me your extensive and well researched list.

Your stupid argument that people need universal health care to be healthy is FUCKING IDIOCY.  Anyone who is sick can walk into any emergency room and get treatment--------BRO--------they just also get a bill.  AND if they are truly destitute, in New Jersey at least, they are instantly enrolled in the charity care system....BRO.

Your arguments fail!  

Bro...

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:55:02 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
Gee I don't know BRAH maybe if all your schools were proper you wouldn't have some No Child Left Behind act specifically telling your schools not to suck.

And people who put off getting preventative medical treatment until they absolutely need emergency treatment probably arent healthy brah, and if you'll give charity care to the destitute then surely you can see the value of having access to medical care even if you're not fucking dying, brosef.

I HAVE AIDS BRAH

FUCK OFF YOU CANT GO TO THE ER TIL YOU GET PNEUMONIA BRO YOU ARE CLEARLY HEALTHY TIL YOU START THE COUGH COUGH COUGH.

BUT I WANT PILLS BRAH

HAHAHAHAHHA THATS FUNNY PILLS FOR SICK PEOPLE WHAT WILL THOSE COMMIES THINK OF NEXT

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 9:55:52 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
So, it is paid at state governement level (with block grants from federal).  Happens like that in most states....

Geez, just like a business we should gather together as states and have the fed do it, increase our buying power and our healthcare abilities.  Just think if the federal government could bid for all the aspirin consumed in America....all the MRIs performed in America, we could reduce our personal, state and federal outlays for our healthcare, and there wouldnt be such a need to lobby and take congress on junkets and donate PAC money and 503 money to them and their campaigns, I guess that would be win-win.....only a fucking drooling imbecile would think otherwise, or a facist, cuz that is pure capitalism at its finest.  Competition and the best man at the lowest price. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 10:00:47 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

I just want the basis for discussion as all should be...well defined. People are entitled to what they pay into...the rest are not. With millionaires politicians receiving their money back through soc. sec are entitled but because it is a small fraction of their income find it far, far too easy to cut it even though it is almost all of someone else's income. That's demagoguery... pure and simple.



LOLOLOLOLOL Thank YOU!!!  Yes!!!  My point EXACTLY.  Been saying that for years.  (Bells ring, angels sing, trumpets blow, sunlight breaks through the clouds)  Welcome to conservatism, Mr. Rodgers.  Just remember...what you have said applies to all people on the socio-economic spectrum.


So where is the rant over corporate welfare, corporate 'entitlements' farm entitlements, ethanol entitlements and a whole array of business subsidies, tax escapism that favor only the investor ? These are investor class 'entitlements' and are costing society a whole lot more and benefiting that same society a whole lot less than all other so-called 'entitlements' combined...most of which amazingly are less of any so-called entitlement, why ?

Because they are fucking paid for not bought through our congressional whores.



Jesus Christ, Mr.R, it is SO tiresome having to repeat myself.  Part of being a regular on any board is eventually knowing what the other guy's view point are so you don't have to keep going back to square one.

What the fuck have I been saying about having a business climate that is favorable to business?  What i proposed was a flat, corporate tax.  I also said lobbying should end and that corporations should not be able to contribute to campaigns.  How many times to I have to say it and re-say it?


I don't know what you've been saying, I have only read and responded to a very few of your posts. Seems we agree on much but disagree on the characterization of certain policies as them being of interest to only one side of politics or govt. such as expenditures on various benefits...some prepaid, some not.

I refuse to believe or in any way agree with the current characterizations as anything the govt. spends in programs that it has been funded (soc. sec./medicare) as a so-called entitlements. They don't even compare to govt. gifts...outright welfare, to other interests such as corporations or producers which are of course in no way...entitlements.

But then one is now forced to think of TARP, etc. etc. as that good ole capitalist sense of entitlement, creating his culture of dependency.

I guess unless of course you are talking to Grover Norquist or Judson Phillips...whoever they is.

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 10:07:43 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway
There are people that oppose this man VISCERALLY!!!  But then LOVE Alan West.  How do you account for that?

Anyone who loves a man who disgraced the uniform of the US Army is a pathetic excuse for an American.

Any American who supports someone who praised America as the greatest nation the earth has ever known out of one side of his mouth and proclaimed he intended to fundamentally transform America out of the other side of his mouth should have their American citizenship revoked, deported and banned from ever returning.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 10:14:06 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

Gee I don't know BRAH maybe if all your schools were proper you wouldn't have some No Child Left Behind act specifically telling your schools not to suck.

Ahhh...so that is your response to being asked for a list of substandard schools, you fucking nit wit????  Nice response.  Do you think that the failure of some kids in our school system is bad parenting BRAH????  How the fuck do you legislate that away....BRAH????  Tell me BRAH, does a 3rd Edition U.S. History book published by Doyle Publishing read DIFFERENT in Philadelphia than it does in Austin, BRAH???

And people who put off getting preventative medical treatment until they absolutely need emergency treatment probably arent healthy brah, and if you'll give charity care to the destitute then surely you can see the value of having access to medical care even if you're not fucking dying, brosef.

More fucking stupidity from YOU, Brah!  The emergency rooms are FULL of people that do not need emergency care.  If emergency rooms only saw the profusely bleeding or the apparent heat attack patient or stroke victim, you might have a point.  People come in with the nondescript headache or the stomach ache and thousands of dollars later in testing, they leave with Tylenol.....BRAH. 

I HAVE AIDS BRAH

FUCK OFF YOU CANT GO TO THE ER TIL YOU GET PNEUMONIA BRO YOU ARE CLEARLY HEALTHY TIL YOU START THE COUGH COUGH COUGH.

BUT I WANT PILLS BRAH

HAHAHAHAHHA THATS FUNNY PILLS FOR SICK PEOPLE WHAT WILL THOSE COMMIES THINK OF NEXT

ahhhhhhhhhhhh....once again we have discovered another liberal arguing for higher taxation because it benefits his own self interest.  Oh sure...he argued that the top 50% paying for the bottom 50% was noble...social justice, good karma, etc.  But the TRUTH is that he benefits directly from one group having to support another group.  Your bias has been revealed and you have rendered yourself null and void.

P.S.  Sorry you have AIDS...that sucks.

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP - 7/28/2011 10:22:15 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Ahhh...so that is your response to being asked for a list of substandard schools, you fucking nit wit????  Nice response.  Do you think that the failure of some kids in our school system is bad parenting BRAH????  How the fuck do you legislate that away....BRAH????  Tell me BRAH, does a 3rd Edition U.S. History book published by Doyle Publishing read DIFFERENT in Philadelphia than it does in Austin, BRAH???



MAYBE IF BOTH OF THOSE SCHOOLS HAD THE SAME TEACHER STUDENT RATIO THE BOOK COULD BE USED MORE EFFICIENTLY BRAH

FUCK THIS HAS ALREADY ESCALATED INTO FULL CAPS LOCK WE NEED TO TONE THIS SHIT DOWN BRAH.

quote:

More fucking stupidity from YOU, Brah!  The emergency rooms are FULL of people that do not need emergency care.  If emergency rooms only saw the profusely bleeding or the apparent heat attack patient or stroke victim, you might have a point.  People come in with the nondescript headache or the stomach ache and thousands of dollars later in testing, they leave with Tylenol.....BRAH. 


IM NOT A CAPITALIST SO I SUCK AT MONEY BRAH BUT WOULDNT IT MAKE MORE SENSE TO INSURE THEM SO THEY COULD JUST GO VISIT THEIR DOCTOR INSTEAD OF HAVING TO GO THE ONLY PLACE THAT WILL TAKE THEM AND RAISING THE COST OF EVERYONE ELSE'S CARE SINCE THE HOSPITAL HAS TO EAT THOSE UNPAID BILLS? BRAH?

quote:

ahhhhhhhhhhhh....once again we have discovered another liberal arguing for higher taxation because it benefits his own self interest.  Oh sure...he argued that the top 50% paying for the bottom 50% was noble...social justice, good karma, etc.  But the TRUTH is that he benefits directly from one group having to support another group.  Your bias has been revealed and you have rendered yourself null and void.


YEAH IF ONLY I HADNT SAID THIS BRAH

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx
I also think that if the government were to provide more across the board benefits (national healthcare, for example) then everyone should be paying income taxes.



quote:

P.S.  Sorry you have AIDS...that sucks.


THANKS BRAH ITS OK THOUGH IM SLEEPING WITH REPUBLICANS DAUGHTERS TIL I DIE. REVENGA REVENGA REVENGA LOLJK ALL THEIR DAUGHTERS ARE UGLY

(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama-obsessed derangement of the GOP Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094