Arpig
Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006 From: Increasingly further from reality Status: offline
|
quote:
It's called the block button, Arpig. I'm of the opinion that only closed-minded people and intellectual cowards use that function. Neither of those is a category into which I had heretofore placed you, of all people. I have to say I'm really pretty disappointed to learn that I was apparently wrong. quote:
She dismissed a qualifier I used to point out the difference between what a republic allows and what representative democracy allows. I don't see the qualifier. There is no difference between a republic and a representative democracy. One last time: a republic IS a representative democracy, there can be no difference between them, as the one (republic) is a subset of the other (representative democracy). quote:
The definitions we used as to what an actual representative democracy is were the same. So, no, she did not point out an 'obvious mistake' that I made as I wrote nothing but fact. Dispute, if you can, what I wrote. You can't. They very clearly were not. You used represntative democracy to describe a system different from the US system, which, as I have pointed out is patently wrong. Here are your exact words: quote:
Well, not quite. A representative democracy allows for a monarchy and our form of government does not but they do serve similiar functions in that they both allow the people to elect reps to speak on our behalf. Our one up is that we can recall any rep up to and including the president any time we choose if we can gather enough voters to do so. By contrast the Queen of England can dissolve parliament (at her peril of course) and the President does not have the power to dissolve a duly elected Congress. The bolded bit is where you have gone wrong. You are using "representative democracy" in place of "constitutional monarchy" or "parliamentary democracy" (either term would have been appropriate.) in addition, you were responding to willbe's remark that quote:
Maybe you missed it but another name for our form of government is representative democracy. You began your remark by saying "Well, not quite", when in fact he is in fact exactly 100% correct with absolutely no qualifiers whatsoever. You presented the US republic as somehow different from a representative democracy. You were wrong to do so, as it is. quote:
Nor can she and she knows it. I doubt that, seeing as she did dispute, correctly, what you wrote, so she clearly can, and knows she can. quote:
If you want to discuss this further with me, Arpig, I'll do so on the other side not here. Nobody is discussing this with you Bita, we are informing you. You used the term incorrectly. You were corrected, you disputed the correction, you were corrected again, you disputed it again, and I am correcting you yet again...I'm pretty sure you will dispute this as well. You want to be right so very badly you are ignoring several things. 1. What the terms you used actually mean. 2. How you used those terms in what you actually said 3. What was actually said in reply to you. quote:
None of this is related at all to the actual topic. Yet you felt it was appropriate to make the point in the first place, you only seem to consider it off topic and unimportant when it has been pointed out that you were mistaken. Now I am done correcting you, feel free to continue in your mistaken belief that you used the term correctly if it's so important to you, those of us who understand what it means know you did not.
_____________________________
Big man! Pig Man! Ha Ha...Charade you are! Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs? CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran
|