RE: How wide is the disconnect? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


mnottertail -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 9:13:38 AM)

A lovely woman tapers off into a fish.

HORACE




AAkasha -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 10:27:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

We blame porn for so much, but perhaps it's also a function of the culture of entitlement. I'm sure you've met the men who think that offering themselves for play is sufficient, and we should feel grateful.



Could be. But I know that this 'offering of oneself' is a pretty common part of the sub fantasy. 'Here I am as a thing for you to take and use'. How could someone not want that, and not be grateful for it?


I don't think porn is the root problem either, though it certainly feeds it. The fact is that people spend a lot more time connecting with their inner worlds of fantasies than with real people in the outside world. They've 'trained' themselves this way from a very early age. It can take a long-term, conscious wrench to connect in a human way with what one first sees as a manifestation of a fantasy - a projection.

We all know this - we find it out when we first start on the romantic trail, as teens or even earlier. But maybe that inner fantasy world amongst kinksters exercises a greater pull than the fantasy worlds of vanillas, and it's harder for us to get it under control. Certainly, to my mind, the common problems that submales and femdoms have with each other have a strong flavour of the teen-romance about them, albeit one that's got distilled into something more potent, thus more addictive. When I first came to CM, I felt like a teen all over again, just left boys' school and mixing with girls at parties. It was a great feeling, but one that I knew I had to control. Bit of Carl Jung again: Sirens have a habit of leading poor male sailors to their deaths. Not good. [;)]




Sometimes I think the "offering of oneself" is the fantasy itself and what comes after that (does she say yes? does she say no? Does she say nothing?) is irrelevant anyway. It's the mental/emotional version of the cockshot in the email. The man presents himself as obtainable and available to a woman he perceives as dominant; the mere act of doing this is fueling his fantasies and keeping his dreams alive, and provides for great emotional and sexual masturbation material. Whatever she says doesn't matter, because he can go through the process again in a week. This also may explain why some men disappear once a woman shows interest. The idea of belonging to someone, forever, in a relationship, is huge -- the thought of making the OFFER is very highly sexually/emotionally charged.

But going through with it? A lot of work. Potential for disaster. Worse - potential for reality to not match up...

Akasha




PeonForHer -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 12:45:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
Sometimes I think the "offering of oneself" is the fantasy itself and what comes after that (does she say yes? does she say no? Does she say nothing?) is irrelevant anyway. It's the mental/emotional version of the cockshot in the email. The man presents himself as obtainable and available to a woman he perceives as dominant; the mere act of doing this is fueling his fantasies and keeping his dreams alive, and provides for great emotional and sexual masturbation material. Whatever she says doesn't matter, because he can go through the process again in a week. This also may explain why some men disappear once a woman shows interest. The idea of belonging to someone, forever, in a relationship, is huge -- the thought of making the OFFER is very highly sexually/emotionally charged.



You could well be right. If so, it's more fuel for the idea that there are different parts of the psyche, and they're in conflict with one another. The key 'parts' here are a) the fantasy of being available to be 'used', 'owned' or in some general way controlled and b) the part of him who is controlling the fantasy - shaping it and managing it in all the ways that suit him best. And that latter will have been refined over the years - it'll actually be quite a big sort of control. So it's a major paradox.

To me, the main message about all this is to recognise the size of what one is up against. But I guess we all know that already. Somewhat depressing.

For what it's worth, if there was one technique I'd suggest both sides use a bit more often, it'd be to inject humour. Be a goddess one minute, blow a raspberry the next. Or, as a sub: worship her one minute, take the pee out of her the next. Demand humour of each other - demand that the other side make you laugh. I can't think of anything that de-stuffs relationships and makes them more human more effectively.




cloudboy -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 2:36:42 PM)


I must have understated the mocking tone.




PeonForHer -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 3:13:05 PM)

No worries, CB - I know your tone pretty well by now. [;)]




Slaveforlife789 -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 3:20:35 PM)

Though the question maybe directed mainly to dominant females, I will respond from a male submissive perspectives, well my own:

Submission is a state of mind in which a male longs for giving up control for what he sees as his leader/owner and guardian. It is a great feeling being owned by someone you trust- trust is a huge thing since a true submissive, in my opinion, do not just submit to anyone. This is why I will never go after professional dominatrix though I do respect their profession. For me, submission is an act outside of the bedroom first. I will not be fulfilled to be a servant only in the bedroom. Also, this does not mean a man should be a door mat ALL THE TIME (nice to be sometime ) but rather a person with intellect, opinion and his own style. The beauty is about knowing that a dominant lady will listen and appreciate the comments from her submissive while making the final call. It is actually very hard for an intelligent submissive man to accept the ruling that comes from a dominant lady who is not at the same level.

Each individual has his/her own strengths/weaknesses and it is very sexual for a dominant lady to accept the submissive suggestions, when appropriate. A full vanilla life is needed for healthy Domme-slave relationship while the dominant partner has the power to “switch” the submissive anytime anywhere. This is how I view it! However, I should have some brain too and know what pleases my lady, being breakfast in bed, massaging her feet or just getting her a flower. Pleasing the lady is what pleases me!

Finally, like any partners, conflicts WILL erupt and it is only through negotiation a solution should be reached- ideally a solution that maximizes the benefits for both.




PeonForHer -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 3:32:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Slaveforlife789

This is how I view it! However, I should have some brain too and know what pleases my lady, being breakfast in bed, massaging her feet or just getting her a flower. Pleasing the lady is what pleases me!


If your lady told you that what she really, really wanted was for you to take the piss out of her, do you think you could do it, SFL?




Slaveforlife789 -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 4:07:19 PM)

That will not be MY lady my freind.




subbingforyou -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 4:13:24 PM)

My take, LadyAngelika, is that you are framing your post in a confusing way. The way I interpret it, you are basically saying, "My conception of dominance/submission is not one that many subs like, and so I have trouble finding one." Fair enough. From that point, though, I am not sure what you are trying to find out. Are you assuming everyone shares your problem? Are you trying to determine if and what aspects of what you like are so far outside the bell-shaped curve that you would consider changing them? Are you simply trying to find out what other people's experience is in terms of how much their ideal fantasy situation that are able to capture in real life?

I think if you are more specific, you will get a more fruitful discussion.




PeonForHer -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 4:33:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Slaveforlife789

That will not be MY lady my freind.


Sorry, SFU, but as it stands, that reply looks a bit cretinous.

What do you mean? Do you mean a proper lady, a lady who you'd get together with, wouldn't ever ask you to take the piss out of her?

Could you make your lady friend laugh, so much that she can't control herself, if she asked you to? Do you think you could, if your lady friend were to be, say, LadyAngelika, LadyConstanze or Akasha?






LadyAngelika -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:08:20 PM)

quote:

Perhaps it'd help if dominants were to accept that not every part of them is dominant, and not every part of submissives is submissive.


Yanno, I agree 100%. So when I want to talk about my life, my hobbies, my dreams and they respond by changing the subject, wanting to know if I have a puppy cage for them to sleep in and if I'll pee on them.... well that's part of the crux of the disconnect ;-)




LadyAngelika -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:11:15 PM)

quote:

You make an amusing point, but I do wonder if this is part of the crux of the matter...and it's no one's fault, but I wonder if part of the fantasy/allure for submissive men (relationship-seeking submissive men, not fetishists or bottoms) is the perception that this kind of "female led" relationship comes without the burden of intimacy-development, relationship-development on them at all.


This is the impression many of them leave me with. It also leaves me with the impression that may believe it doesn't come with the burden of making much of an effort over all.




LadyConstanze -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:16:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

Perhaps it'd help if dominants were to accept that not every part of them is dominant, and not every part of submissives is submissive.


Yanno, I agree 100%. So when I want to talk about my life, my hobbies, my dreams and they respond by changing the subject, wanting to know if I have a puppy cage for them to sleep in and if I'll pee on them.... well that's part of the crux of the disconnect ;-)



LOL, nope, that's just when all desire leaves me and I'd say a polite but hasty "It's been nice getting to know you, good luck!"




LadyAngelika -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:17:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subbingforyou

My take, LadyAngelika, is that you are framing your post in a confusing way. The way I interpret it, you are basically saying, "My conception of dominance/submission is not one that many subs like, and so I have trouble finding one."


Well it might be confusing to you, but since so many have contributed answers that have hit home, I feel that while my ideas might not have been fully formed, most of those who took the time to read carefully got it. I'm happy with this thread so far, despite a few glitches in the begining.

quote:

Fair enough. From that point, though, I am not sure what you are trying to find out.


Read past page 1 :)

quote:

Are you assuming everyone shares your problem?


I would never make that assumption about any problem.

quote:

Are you trying to determine if and what aspects of what you like are so far outside the bell-shaped curve that you would consider changing them?


I don't think so. I'm not planning on making any massive changes. Compromises, sure, but I'm pretty much set in my ways in the kind of relationship I want. Besides, I never said that I though what I wanted was impossible. I just said it was rare.

quote:

Are you simply trying to find out what other people's experience is in terms of how much their ideal fantasy situation that are able to capture in real life?


No. I'm asking people if they have insight on what causes disconnects between submissive men and dominant women. I'm not the only one who experiences this. That said, not all submissive men and dominant women do. Remember I said that I didn't think this was everyone's problem?

quote:

I think if you are more specific, you will get a more fruitful discussion.


Again, read past page 1. The discussion has been quite awesome.




LadyAngelika -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:19:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

Perhaps it'd help if dominants were to accept that not every part of them is dominant, and not every part of submissives is submissive.


Yanno, I agree 100%. So when I want to talk about my life, my hobbies, my dreams and they respond by changing the subject, wanting to know if I have a puppy cage for them to sleep in and if I'll pee on them.... well that's part of the crux of the disconnect ;-)



LOL, nope, that's just when all desire leaves me and I'd say a polite but hasty "It's been nice getting to know you, good luck!"


I can't even tell them that it's been nice!!! ;-)




LadyConstanze -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:31:23 PM)

Hey, anything for a quick escape... [;)]




LadyAngelika -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:33:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
Sometimes I think the "offering of oneself" is the fantasy itself and what comes after that (does she say yes? does she say no? Does she say nothing?) is irrelevant anyway. It's the mental/emotional version of the cockshot in the email. The man presents himself as obtainable and available to a woman he perceives as dominant; the mere act of doing this is fueling his fantasies and keeping his dreams alive, and provides for great emotional and sexual masturbation material. Whatever she says doesn't matter, because he can go through the process again in a week. This also may explain why some men disappear once a woman shows interest. The idea of belonging to someone, forever, in a relationship, is huge -- the thought of making the OFFER is very highly sexually/emotionally charged.



You could well be right. If so, it's more fuel for the idea that there are different parts of the psyche, and they're in conflict with one another. The key 'parts' here are a) the fantasy of being available to be 'used', 'owned' or in some general way controlled and b) the part of him who is controlling the fantasy - shaping it and managing it in all the ways that suit him best. And that latter will have been refined over the years - it'll actually be quite a big sort of control. So it's a major paradox.

To me, the main message about all this is to recognise the size of what one is up against. But I guess we all know that already. Somewhat depressing.


These are brilliant reflections Akasha and Peon. Thank you so much!

quote:

For what it's worth, if there was one technique I'd suggest both sides use a bit more often, it'd be to inject humour. Be a goddess one minute, blow a raspberry the next.


Have we met? :-p






LadyAngelika -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:40:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Slaveforlife789

Though the question maybe directed mainly to dominant females, I will respond from a male submissive perspectives, well my own:

Submission is a state of mind in which a male longs for giving up control for what he sees as his leader/owner and guardian. It is a great feeling being owned by someone you trust- trust is a huge thing since a true submissive, in my opinion, do not just submit to anyone. This is why I will never go after professional dominatrix though I do respect their profession. For me, submission is an act outside of the bedroom first. I will not be fulfilled to be a servant only in the bedroom. Also, this does not mean a man should be a door mat ALL THE TIME (nice to be sometime ) but rather a person with intellect, opinion and his own style. The beauty is about knowing that a dominant lady will listen and appreciate the comments from her submissive while making the final call. It is actually very hard for an intelligent submissive man to accept the ruling that comes from a dominant lady who is not at the same level.

Each individual has his/her own strengths/weaknesses and it is very sexual for a dominant lady to accept the submissive suggestions, when appropriate. A full vanilla life is needed for healthy Domme-slave relationship while the dominant partner has the power to “switch” the submissive anytime anywhere. This is how I view it! However, I should have some brain too and know what pleases my lady, being breakfast in bed, massaging her feet or just getting her a flower. Pleasing the lady is what pleases me!

Finally, like any partners, conflicts WILL erupt and it is only through negotiation a solution should be reached- ideally a solution that maximizes the benefits for both.



Thank you for your perspective. We are going to have an even larger disconnect as I'm really not looking for a slave type. The idea that a man would want me to be his guardian? Not something that I'm going to be. In fact, I've often written that for me, a good submissive man is like a guard dog and would be my guardian ;-)

That said, I absolutely appreciate you sharing your views, as disconnected as they are with mine. But it takes all kinds of people to make the world go round!




LadyAngelika -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 5:42:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

Hey, anything for a quick escape... [;)]


Ha!!! Yes, true. Still, I'll substitute "nice" for "errr.. interesting" :)




Slaveforlife789 -> RE: How wide is the disconnect? (8/8/2011 9:42:53 PM)

LadyAngelika:

Thanks for the comment. So I will not have the chance kneeling in front of you and tasting your beautiful cane :( ---well, I wish :)

In my opinion, even a guard dog will need a leader of the pack- without a strong leader, the dog is lost. I do view my domme as my leader and to clarify I will protect her when needed yet I will be down at her feet when she desires. I usually pay attention to what makes my Domme happy and do what she likes without her asking for. That is my style.

Anyhow, I truly believe that connection at the vanilla level (intellect, interests..etc) is needed to establish a good female led relationship. Anyhow, I can see from your various posts that you are way experienced than me in the domain of Domination/submission

Cheers




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875