RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene

Page: << < prev 3 4 5 6 [7]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/29/2011 3:09:31 PM

Slavehandsome

Posts: 382
Joined: 9/19/2004
Status: offline

If you want to know the truth about Irene, Ivan, Katrina, or any other hurricane that somehow manages to avoid Cuba but devastates the U.S., study the legality of Scalar Technology.

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 121

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/29/2011 3:17:34 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

Here is mine....

On November 27, 2006, Judge Stanwood R. Duval Jr. issued his long awaited decision as to insurance coverage for water damage and flooding following the levee breaches during Hurricane Katrina.[1] The insurers argued that there was no coverage for the damage because the policies excluded coverage for water damage, including flood. The insurers contended the inundation of water in the City of New Orleans caused by the failure of the levees excluded water damage. The insureds, on the other hand, maintained that the term “flood” was ambiguous and, therefore, coverage should be provided. The insureds further argued that because the third-party negligence of the Orleans Levee District was the efficient, proximate cause of the subsequent flooding of plaintiffs’ homes, their policies should provide coverage. In an eighty-four page decision, Judge Duval found it depends on the specific policy language as to whether unnatural flood is excluded

Several different policies of insurance were involved in this case. The court examined each policy separately and found that coverage was afforded under some, but not all, depending on the language of the flood exclusion. In summary, the court found that the policies issued by insurers that contained the ISO water damage exclusion provided coverage for the losses sustained by the insureds, but that the policies issued by State Farm and the Hartford did not.

http://www.rkmc.com/Louisiana-Judge-Rules-on-Katrina-Insurance-Coverage-Cases.htm

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 122

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/29/2011 3:52:58 PM

MileHighM

Posts: 400
Joined: 10/8/2009
Status: offline

Hmmm.... Maybe I am the slow child here and haven't noticed any similar posts....

Ever notice something about FightDirecto.. He starts a thread, usually partisan hackish, sometimes not, but controversial none the less. Then, he almost never adds to it. He never defends his OP, he just likes to kick the hornet's nest so to speak. Even the most maniacal whack jobs on here rarely resort to drive-by argumentation.

I think it is time to just start the ignoring campaign, or at least keep responses to calling him a Troll.

As much fun as some of these discussions become, if I see FD as the thread starter, from now on, I think I am going to have to just look away.

Gonna have to post this on another thread or two as well.

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 123

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/29/2011 4:02:43 PM

willbeurdaddy

Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Here is mine....

On November 27, 2006, Judge Stanwood R. Duval Jr. issued his long awaited decision as to insurance coverage for water damage and flooding following the levee breaches during Hurricane Katrina.[1] The insurers argued that there was no coverage for the damage because the policies excluded coverage for water damage, including flood. The insurers contended the inundation of water in the City of New Orleans caused by the failure of the levees excluded water damage. The insureds, on the other hand, maintained that the term “flood” was ambiguous and, therefore, coverage should be provided. The insureds further argued that because the third-party negligence of the Orleans Levee District was the efficient, proximate cause of the subsequent flooding of plaintiffs’ homes, their policies should provide coverage. In an eighty-four page decision, Judge Duval found it depends on the specific policy language as to whether unnatural flood is excluded

Several different policies of insurance were involved in this case. The court examined each policy separately and found that coverage was afforded under some, but not all, depending on the language of the flood exclusion. In summary, the court found that the policies issued by insurers that contained the ISO water damage exclusion provided coverage for the losses sustained by the insureds, but that the policies issued by State Farm and the Hartford did not.

http://www.rkmc.com/Louisiana-Judge-Rules-on-Katrina-Insurance-Coverage-Cases.htm

youve got it backwards..thank you for posting MY proof. The insurance companies in question didnt succed in not paying claims that were valid.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 124

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/29/2011 4:09:15 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

The very fact that they attempted is enough, willbe. And how many succeeded in not paying out to those who were entitled but were convinced they were not?

Get off your high horse. The truth is insurance comapnies attempt tp not pay out claims all the time. The fact that they get caught sometimes is just what they consider the price of doing business.

Or are you going to try and defend insurance companies now?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)

Profile

Post #: 125

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/30/2011 7:36:04 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

He always has, he peddles the shit, yanno certified financial planner (insurance peddler).

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 126

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/30/2011 11:39:48 AM

Fightdirecto

Posts: 1101
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MileHighM

Hmmm.... Maybe I am the slow child here and haven't noticed any similar posts....

Ever notice something about FightDirecto.. He starts a thread, usually partisan hackish, sometimes not, but controversial none the less. Then, he almost never adds to it. He never defends his OP, he just likes to kick the hornet's nest so to speak. Even the most maniacal whack jobs on here rarely resort to drive-by argumentation.

Actually, I have been "on the road" because of my profession (I have been working as a professional jazz musician since retiring from the film & TV business - 25+ years as a stuntman and my body told me to "Quit!") and haven't had access to a computer until today.

But, yes, sometimes I do start a discussion just for the sake of starting a discussion - because I enjoy discussions and idea exchange.

_____________________________

"I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.””
- Ellie Wiesel

(in reply to MileHighM)

Profile

Post #: 127

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/30/2011 12:14:34 PM

popeye1250

Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
link=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/08/29/limbaugh_cost_of_irene_pales_in_comparison_to_cost_of_hurricane_obama.html]RUSH: Cost of Irene 'Pales in Comparison' to Hurricane Obama...[/link]

Yes, because 'Rush Limbaugh' has always displayed such a 'neutral' and 'unbias' outlook on the performance of Mr. Obama for the past three years, right?

Joether, it sounds as though Rush Limbaugh has gone easy on Oblunder.
He's been an absolute disaster for the last three years!
Telling car companies how to build cars, dictating what kind of light bulbs you can have in your house, getting us involved in yet another war to the tune of $1B a day, comming up with a health care plan that no-one wants, surrounding himself with Wall Street insiders and then using U.S. Taxpayer Dollars to bail out big banks, brokerage houses, insurance cos. and making us Taxpayers take the hit instead of those cos. stockholders!
No-one is "too big to fail!" Why do we even bother to have bankruptcy laws on the books?
And then we have Freddie and Fannie Mac and all the corruption with Barny Frank and Sen. Chris Dodd.
What's Obunder ever *done* in his life besides go to school on the Taxpayer's dime and staple some placards into telephone poles? And didn't he get a "foreign student scholarship" at Harvard or Columbia? What's that all about?
And he told us *three times* in the same speech that there are 57 states.
This guy is so fucking stupid that it's impossible to be "neutral" or "unbiased" on him! They'll come out and say that he has a 162 i.q. but Columbia or Harvard won't release his transcripts just like Providence College won't release Patches Kennedy's transcripts.
Oblunder wasn't even a very good lawyer and he's never had to meet a payroll and has zero management experience.
Boy, I'd never apply to be an Oblunder defender, that has to be the most difficult job in the world!

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 8/30/2011 12:16:27 PM >

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to joether)

Profile

Post #: 128

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/30/2011 2:45:16 PM

farglebargle

Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

This guy is so fucking stupid that it's impossible to be "neutral" or "unbiased" on him!

What is your opinion of Rick Perry and Michelle Bachmann, then? I mean, they're blithering idiots who listen to the voices in their head. If Obama pisses you off, they must give you an aneurism.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to popeye1250)

Profile

Post #: 129

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/30/2011 2:56:24 PM

willbeurdaddy

Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The very fact that they attempted is enough, willbe. And how many succeeded in not paying out to those who were entitled but were convinced they were not?

Get off your high horse. The truth is insurance comapnies attempt tp not pay out claims all the time. The fact that they get caught sometimes is just what they consider the price of doing business.

Or are you going to try and defend insurance companies now?

Insurance companies are businesses that cant stay in business if they don't pay legitimate claims. That they "attempted" is NOT enough, in fact even losing on occasion is not enough, all it means is they drafted the contract so poorly there was ambiguity over coverage. Claims that they attempt to deny claims that are clearly legitimate are total bullshit.

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 8/30/2011 2:57:46 PM >

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 130

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/30/2011 2:59:06 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

It may be total bullshit, but it does happen and does work, its the modus operandi for some companies.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)

Profile

Post #: 131

RE: East Coast Tea Partiers & Hurricane Irene - 8/30/2011 3:34:56 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

It may be total bullshit, but it does happen and does work, its the modus operandi for some companies.

Exactly.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 132