Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic I was in the fifth grade, the first time I picked up George Orwell's 1984. It scared the hell out me, and has managed to do that every time I've picked it up since. Just scanning through the opening chapters, and looking for the snip below creeped me out. (For anyone who has never read the novel, it is out of copyright, and available to read free, online. http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/0.html ) As Winston Smith goes about his job in the Ministry of Truth, correcting and updating the past, Orwell asks a little suspension of disbelief from his readers. Every hard copy, everywhere, must be tracked down and replaced? quote:
What happened in the unseen labyrinth to which the pneumatic tubes led, he did not know in detail, but he did know in general terms. As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of The Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in its stead. This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs -- to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance. Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. As I think most people would have done, I rationalized that there would be a lot fewer people who saved pamphlets, or lived in homes surrounded by books, gave him the leap on "how" it was done, and let the horror of "what" was being done have its impact In the age we live in though, with the developments coming into play, and all the records going to electronic storage, do you think this aspect of Orwell's nightmare vision might soon become possible? Forget the pneumatic tubes and printing presses, substitute "he completed his upload, and pressed 'submit' to send the corrective cloud crawler program in its way." This subject could easily attract the attentions of more conspiracy minded posters, who might say it's already here. I hope that won't scare off the rational. well you went trollling and you caught one. One you wont be able to handle. Thats right its right under your nose and you as can be seen by your lack of rational presentation that you are none the wiser. Here is a sweet example and a 2 x 4 to wake you up how words are ABUSED and accepted by not only scholars but also and worse the courts. In fact the courts who control the country are the worst abusers of them all. quote:
holocaust mid-13c., "sacrifice by fire, burnt offering," from Gk. holokauston "a thing wholly burnt," neut. of holokaustos "burned whole," from holos "whole" (see holo-) + kaustos, verbal adjective of kaiein "to burn." Originally a Bible word for "burnt offerings," given wider sense of "massacre, destruction of a large number of persons" from 1833. The Holocaust "Nazi genocide of European Jews in World War II," first recorded 1957, earlier known in Hebrew as Shoah "catastrophe." The word itself was used in English in reference to Hitler's Jewish policies from 1942, but not as a proper name for them. Auschwitz makes all too clear the principle that the human psyche can create meaning out of anything. [Robert Jay Lifton, "The Nazi Doctors"] Holocaust never did and never will have a fucking thing to do with massacre! It is a linguistic abortion. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=holocaust 1984 should scare the hell out of you.
< Message edited by Real0ne -- 9/11/2011 10:02:48 PM >
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment? Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality! "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|