RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


FatDomDaddy -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:35:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

"I fully expect this election cycle to be the nastiest and most polarizing we have ever seen."


Really,......why is that?


What has President Obama done(besides asking his supporters to share the con-nastiness we find)to support that contention?


Or is it more of a plan,rather than an expectation?



And your baseless accusations about people's military records where you have zero proof?




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:39:05 PM)

FR...

I am still wondering who was boob hatching and tattle tailing.

I mean...do people actually get personally offended about politics and religion on a fetish site message board?





Owner59 -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:42:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

"I fully expect this election cycle to be the nastiest and most polarizing we have ever seen."


Really,......why is that?


What has President Obama done(besides asking his supporters to share the con-nastiness we find)to support that contention?


Or is it more of a plan,rather than an expectation?



And your baseless accusations about people's military records where you have zero proof?

Not baseless at all.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:42:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

FR...

I am still wondering who was boob hatching and tattle tailing.

I mean...do people actually get personally offended about politics and religion on a fetish site message board?




Baseless accusations about people's military service from the playground set can do that...of course its not a TOS violation to lie about someone.




Kirata -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:43:05 PM)



quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I fully expect this election cycle to be the nastiest and most polarizing we have ever seen.

Or, it could be a waltz...

Ron Paul Bests Obama in Latest Poll

Harris [Table 2]  Base: All Adults (2,462 adults surveyed between September 12 and 19, 2011)
"Looking at the list below, assuming each person listed is the Republican nominee running against President Obama in the 2012 presidential election, who would you vote for?"

Ron Paul 51%, Obama 49%

K.




Owner59 -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:43:51 PM)

Or to point out fakes.




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:44:59 PM)

quote:

Not baseless at all.
Have you taken him up on his offer to provide proof?




Owner59 -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:48:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata



quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I fully expect this election cycle to be the nastiest and most polarizing we have ever seen.

Or, it could be a waltz...

Ron Paul Bests Obama in Latest Poll

Harris [Table 2]  Base: All Adults (2,462 adults surveyed between September 12 and 19, 2011)
"Looking at the list below, assuming each person listed is the Republican nominee running against President Obama in the 2012 presidential election, who would you vote for?"

Ron Paul 51%, Obama 49%

K.


But then Ron Paul will start talking about getting rid of the Fed and "fiat" money and he`ll start looking a little weird and extreme,tho folksy.

I would welcome a Paul/Obama match up.




Owner59 -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:52:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Not baseless at all.
Have you taken him up on his offer to provide proof?

And how do fakes provide proof?

Get back to us on that.

I go with the assume someone is candid about such things if they share them,rule.

You get only one chance with me tho,if you`re bullshiting.

After that,bubbb-bye.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:54:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Not baseless at all.
Have you taken him up on his offer to provide proof?

And how do fakes provide proof?

Get back to us on that.

I go with the assume someone is candid about such things if they share them,rule.

You get only one chance with me tho,if you`re bullshiting.

After that,bubbb-bye.



In other words he hasnt because it would destroy one of his greatest passions, stalking me.




Kirata -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:55:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And how do fakes provide proof?

You might want to give some thought to that question yourself.

I haven't seen any proof from you either.

K.




Owner59 -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:56:27 PM)

ewwww.

That`s creepy.....

lol,I just scroll past you.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:57:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

ewwww.

That`s creepy.....

lol,I just scroll past you.


Nobody said you had to read what I say to respond to every post of mine with your lie.




Owner59 -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:57:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And how do fakes provide proof?

You might want to give some thought to that question yourself.

I haven't seen any proof from you either.

K.




About what claim?




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 9:58:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Or to point out fakes.



Then do so.

I mean it's not rocket science.

Did you even see what I wrote earlier?

Who made you arbiter of military service for fetish message boards?

If not... if you can't prove it, then your constant harping is bullying.






FatDomDaddy -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 10:01:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59



And how do fakes provide proof?



Wait... YOU are making the accusations... the burden of proof is on the accuser.






HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 10:02:29 PM)

quote:

And how do fakes provide proof?

Get back to us on that.

I go with the assume someone is candid about such things if they share them,rule.

You get only one chance with me tho,if you`re bullshiting.

After that,bubbb-bye.
In other words, no, you didn't. Now that presents us with two possibilities:

1) You have some proof of your own to back your assertion that he is lying about his military service, or.
2) It is just your opinion.

Do you have any proof, and if so, would you mind providing it?





Owner59 -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 10:06:24 PM)

He posted he carried hundred of injured GIs off the battle field till someone checked the facts and found he was years to young to have been able too.

That equals fake.

So now how does one make that correct,on the "netz"?

Prison is full of the dopes who were dumb enough to get caught.

Most of the smart ones don`t make stupid slip-ups.




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 10:12:28 PM)

quote:

He posted he carried hundred of injured GIs off the battle field till someone checked the facts and found he was years to young to have been able too.
Well, according to his posted age, he could indeed have served there for up to 4 years <1971 to 1975>, so your proof isn't very convincing.

Assuming the peace accord would have ended any chance to rescue wounded soldiers, he still had 3 years or so to serve.




rulemylife -> RE: Hmmm..."An update on Posting Style in this category" (9/28/2011 10:13:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

I spend some time on the other boards and the insults I see going on there are far worse than P&R.

But for some reason this board has a bad reputation that I don't understand.

If I have ever accused you of not having a sense of humor, I take it back.

K.



Come on. Really? I have been on the other forums and see the sniping and snarking going on there.

I really think this board is tamer and more well behaved than most of the others.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875