FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet Tuition at my state universities has risen 14-17% each year for the last 4 years. Funding from the state has been cut 50% in the last three years. Coincidence? I think not. UW raised tuition because they had to make up for their loss in funding somehow. In addition they began actively recruiting more out of state students who pay higher tuition. It most certainly is a funding problem, and I would rather see it be dealt with by improving funding at the schools than forgiving student loan UW is the situation I am most familiar with, but I imagine this is true at other universities also. In addition, UW funded their endowment with lots of real estate investments that took a huge hit when the Seattle market crashed. I just don't see all this wasteful spending you are talking about, I see funds drying up. quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote:
ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet Great post Samboct. . Seems we are in agreement that people need to take a much harder look at the cost/ benefit of higher education. I also am strutting with this, since I have long bought into the idea of education leading to a better life. I also agree that out of control tuition is part of the problem, and that won't change until the states find ways to increase funding. I also think that private so called trade schools need to be penalized for being little more that financial aid mills, in many cases. I basically agree with this, except I take exception to the belief that it is a "funding" problem with schools. The cost of tuition has risen all out of proportion to inflation. Schools need to look at what they are doing that is not education and to be more constrained on what they spend. It's not the lack of money spent on education that is causing the majority of the problem. It's the lack of strong fiscal constraints on the budgets of many of the schools that is the problem. Bown's Rule: "All universities, and in particular major institutions with or seeking elite status, will use any and all funds they receive for the pursuit of perceived excellence and improvement.” Financial Aid in Theory and Practice While spending money in the pursuit of excellence by universities sounds great—who doesn’t like excellence— there is the downside that whatever they spend has to come from somewhere. Indeed, the expenditure of additional resources is the same thing as raising the cost per student. Thus, if the financial aid system allows for schools to acquire additional resources, it will have the effect of raising costs per student. In other words, viewing the problem as how to distribute financial aid, given the costs of providing an education is inappropriate when costs are partly determined by the financial aid system. Is there reason to suspect that the current financial aid system will lead to higher costs? Yes. Interesting read. In effect, there are few market limits to what the "higher education" system will spend, given the opportunity, and little in the way of concrete measurement yardsticks. The more money you feed it, the more money it can justify and seek, but the study specifically shows that the way we fund it causes a rise in tuition costs. Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|