Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006 From: Dirty Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tj444 quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven Nothing happened before because it would have required an invasion of an outside force. It's been pretty clearly proven (thanks, W) that that leads to a miserable morass. Here, we were given the chance to topple him solely by nudging things and helping the rebels win. and the US had no problem going against NATO by invading Iraq, (not just once but twice). But we will see how this turns out. I somehow doubt whoever the new dictator will be, that he will be any better. Not fair to say "US". The blame for that cluster-fuck lay with a relatively small group of men and one woman,Condi Rice. We were essentially tricked into it, with the threat of nuclear attack,fresh on the heals of an unbelievably devastating,almost incomprehensible attack in NYC and in Washington. I don`t think the neo-cons could have pulled off invading Iraq if 9/11 didn`t happen.Just wouldn`t have happened. We wouldn`t have invaded Afghanistan either,without 9/11. The gripe by cons about not invading Libya with our own troops, sooner, is more about bush and his fuck ups and trying to cover for him. We avoided doing those things on purpose in Libya.bush`s Iraq policy was an instruction manual on exactly what NOT to do.
< Message edited by Owner59 -- 10/24/2011 8:45:06 PM >
_____________________________
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals" President Obama
|