RE: Monster.......

RE: Monster....... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

tazzygirl -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 10:47:14 AM)
A statute of limitations is a law that sets the time within which criminal charges or civil claims can be filed and after which one loses the right to sue or make a claim. Most states provide for extensions of the statute of limitations, either through state law or judicial tolling doctrines. A tolling doctrine is a rule that suspends the date from which a statutory period starts to run. An example is the minority tolling doctrine, which provides that a statutory period does not begin to run until the child becomes an adult. Read more: Child Abuse and the Law - The Statute Of Limitations - Court, California, Time, and Stogner http://www.libraryindex.com/pages/1428/Child-Abuse-Law-STATUTE-LIMITATIONS.html#ixzz1cfImKaat Except as provided in Article 12.03, felony indictments may be presented within these limits, and not afterward: (4) five years from the date of the commission of the offense: (A) theft, burglary, robbery; (B) kidnapping; (C) injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual that is not punishable as a felony of the first degree under Section 22.04, Penal Code; (D) abandoning or endangering a child; or (E) insurance fraud; http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29418 Its close

LillyBoPeep -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 10:47:31 AM)
the huffington post article about this said that the wife had already left the marriage because of abuse.

tazzygirl -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 10:56:10 AM)
Hmmm... Hold that.... she has five more years according to this... (2) ten years from the date of the commission of the offense: (A) theft of any estate, real, personal or mixed, by an executor, administrator, guardian or trustee, with intent to defraud any creditor, heir, legatee, ward, distributee, beneficiary or settlor of a trust interested in such estate; (B) theft by a public servant of government property over which he exercises control in his official capacity; (C) forgery or the uttering, using or passing of forged instruments; (D) injury to an elderly or disabled individual punishable as a felony of the first degree under Section 22.04, Penal Code; http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/SOTWDocs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm § 22.04. INJURY TO A CHILD, ELDERLY INDIVIDUAL, OR DISABLED INDIVIDUAL. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence, by act or intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly by omission, causes to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual: (1) serious bodily injury; (2) serious mental deficiency, impairment, or injury; or (3) bodily injury. http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/22.04.00.html Daddy dear may, in fact, still face abuse charges against a child because she is disabled.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 10:57:14 AM)
ty taz

tazzygirl -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 10:59:12 AM)
Welcome. The idea of this idiot not being charged for this crime.... ugh!

Iamsemisweet -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 11:13:58 AM)
Might not be too late for a civil suit either. Can you look up the SOL for that Tazzy? Sorry, but I am not at my office, I am home sick, so I don't have access to westlaw. The SOL wouldn't begin to run until she turned 18, at least in my state.

tazzygirl -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 11:40:58 AM)
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL SUBTITLE B. TRIAL MATTERS CHAPTER 16. LIMITATIONS SUBCHAPTER A. LIMITATIONS OF PERSONAL ACTIONS Sec. 16.001. EFFECT OF DISABILITY. (a) For the purposes of this subchapter, a person is under a legal disability if the person is: (1) younger than 18 years of age, regardless of whether the person is married; or (2) of unsound mind. (b) If a person entitled to bring a personal action is under a legal disability when the cause of action accrues, the time of the disability is not included in a limitations period. (c) A person may not tack one legal disability to another to extend a limitations period. (d) A disability that arises after a limitations period starts does not suspend the running of the period. Tolling of the Statute of Limitations In addition to late discovery, it may be possible to avoid the harsh result of a statute of limitation by arguing that the statute has been "tolled". When it is said that a statute is "tolled", it means that something has stopped the statute from running for a period of time. Typical reasons for tolling a statute of limitations include minority (the victim of the injury was a minor at the time the injury occurred), mental incompetence (the victim of the injury was not mentally competent at the time the injury occurred), and the defendant's bankruptcy (the "automatic stay" in bankruptcy ordinarily tolls the statute of limitations until such time as the bankruptcy is resolved or the stay is lifted). Under Texas law, except in cases of medical malpractice, a statute of limitations begins to run on a minor's eighteenth birthday. For medical malpractice cases involving minors under the age of twelve, suit must be filed by the date of the minor's fourteenth birthday. I have a feeling the statute for civil suit is either close or has run out. Maybe that is the daughters motive?

tazzygirl -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 11:42:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet Might not be too late for a civil suit either. Can you look up the SOL for that Tazzy? Sorry, but I am not at my office, I am home sick, so I don't have access to westlaw. The SOL wouldn't begin to run until she turned 18, at least in my state. Most of what I found was for sexual abuse. The term is two years for physical abuse/personal injury... but it may progress to five because of her disability. On that, I am not sure.

kalikshama -> RE: Monster.......(video of TX family court judge beating his 16 yr old) (11/3/2011 11:49:44 AM)
nvm, refresh FAIL

tazzygirl -> RE: Monster.......(video of TX family court judge beating his 16 yr old) (11/3/2011 11:51:10 AM)
lol.. she cleared that up.

slvemike4u -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 11:57:15 AM)
Eternal said..."Household discipline is not necessarily 'domestic violence' " Two things here Eternal,first off I never asserted it was. Second thing..for me that was not an option,I was the child of an abusive bastard...who beat me and my siblings black and blue(funny thing,when I grew up I remember cops at the house for him hitting my mother,mothers brothers beating him up for the same reason...no cops and no uncles for hitting is children...certainly a different time) my thinking,above and beyond my promise to myself,was that I could not AFFORD to go down that road.In other words what might be today a swat on the ass,given my history,might tomorrow be a smack across the face...etc etc. That was not a chance I was willing to take,let me go further here....children that have been abused are just different,they have different filters and different memories than "normal" children. Allow me to offer an example....my fathers abuse was beyond simple corporal punishment,it involved abuse of other means(this man is long dead and certainly not missed) one of the harshest examples of the legacy he had left me was when I was wrestling with my than 5 year old son on my bed.Wrestling and laughing with my boy....when a cold chill went down my spine,in the wrestling I felt I had "touched" him,inadvertently to be sure....but due to my history that chill distorted what should have been just another happy day with my boy. Normal fathers do not have such a concern....so no,for me whacking my son on the ass was never an option. Now I will step out on a ledge and go a little further,any parent who can not find a more effectual way of getting their point across than whacking their child in the ass....hasn't thought aout things long enough . Sorry folks there are far better and more effective ways to get your children's attention.

thishereboi -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:03:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep i just saw this via facebook -- he's a fucking nutjob. and he presides over CHILD ABUSE CASES. that blows my mind. he's currently under investigation, thank goodness. he says "it wasn't as bad as it looks in the video" -- how do you know, fuckface?? geeeez louiiise........ I think someone should beat him like that and see if he still thinks it doesn't look that bad.

Lucylastic -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:08:26 PM)
me pick me pick me let it be non consensual tooo.

thishereboi -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:20:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic me pick me pick me let it be non consensual tooo. no problems there[8D]

Lucylastic -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:22:22 PM)
[sm=axe.gif][;)]

Marc2b -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:31:13 PM)
Mother fucking, shit sniffing, twat headed, dick for brains, scumbag, douche sucking, filthy, shirveled souled, arrogant, pissant, turd gropping, fetid slime that congealed out of the rancid cunt drippings of some cheap crack head street slut! I hope he gets testicular cancer and his tiny little gonads drop off! I hope he gets arthritis in the hands so bad that he'll never be able to pick up a belt again or pull on his tiny pud! I hope he gets kidnapped by a gang of demented homesexual bikers who chain him in their basment and ram hot lava lamps up his ass! Okay, now that I've got that out of my system. I hope that the law will be able to take some action against him. Failing that, I hope that he is at least removed from the bench. I hope that he actually grows a conscious one day and sees himself for what he truly is (that would hurt worse than the hot lava lamps up the ass). I hope his daughter finds peace and joy in her life.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:36:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic me pick me pick me let it be non consensual tooo. no problems there[8D] awRIGHT you 2. Conservatives and liberals are not supposed to be civil to each other, much less friendly. Right here on page 793, paragraph 16 of the CM P&R poster's handbook so break it up.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:37:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SternSkipper Well I wasn't really ever disciplined physically Best reason for corporal punishment Ive seen yet.

Lucylastic -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:39:40 PM)
Sod that for a game of soldiers, I like who I like, rpub or dem, lib or con. And you cant make me change neenr neener neener I aint got no weiner

Marc2b -> RE: Monster....... (11/3/2011 12:41:00 PM)
quote: I aint got no weiner But you got the buns!

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875