Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Transgender Thread


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: The Transgender Thread Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 12:03:17 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
njlauren,

lovely post.

Thanks to you, stella and otter - This has been very very interesting.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 1:53:38 PM   
TheFireWithinMe


Posts: 1672
Joined: 10/3/2011
From: The Depths of Hell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wolf2Bear

quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker

adulation of a female =/= becoming a female. 

I'm aware that it is probably some incurable mental disease the transsexual types experience where they must become the opposite sex, but people will still shun you in terms of relationship material more often than not.  Where I draw the line is when they run around claiming to be fully female/male and deny being transsexual.  That's just deceptive and 99% of the time you can tell they're giving you a white lie. 

My personal thought is that they should just roll with what they've been given in life. 




I pity you.




I don't understand this given how he apparently goes out of his way to look feminine or at least genderbender.

edited to fix the quote thingies.

< Message edited by TheFireWithinMe -- 11/14/2011 1:54:25 PM >


_____________________________

Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags

There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast. ~Author Unknown

(in reply to Wolf2Bear)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 2:22:13 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


Wolf-
Basically with the OP the real issue is his own fear of being around trans people who may be read (i.e spotted as trans) and what people would think of him. It goes along with the tone of his posts, when he talks about being with friends only if they bring something to him and someone who brings 'negatives' cannot be a friend. In other words, it is someone who judges others for whom they are friends with and assumes everyone else is like that. There are people like that with socioeconomic factors i.e they won't associate with anyone less well off then themselves, people who wouldn't be caught being dead being friends with a person of another race because 'what would people think' and so forth. I wonder, too, if the same thing would apply to people who are overweight, who aren't that good looking, have physical deformities, etc. I mean, could you imagine being around someone with an artificial leg, how embarassing! *snort*.

It is no different then gays and lesbians who want all those 'embarassing' drag queens, trans people , leather people, butch lesbians, etc to 'hide' because they are why "mainstream' america discriminates against them. It was so bad when they had the 25th anniversary pride march in NYC of the stonewall revolt, the parade organizers among other things refused to allow trans groups to march, arguing 'we are trying to be mainstream'..ironic, considering the stonewall riot was started by gender variant types...

Indeed. I note his projection of his inability to see women as anything other than sex objects onto me with great amusement. This is quite revealing, and is consistent with your observations that he is only able to see people for their utility to him. I'd be willing to bet that he's score very high on the Narcissistic and Sociopathic questions on the MMPI. His statement (the last sentence) in the quote below I find highly ironic.

quote:

Awareness
quote:


Hippiekinkster
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus
I will always be bemused at some folks. Do you men look at all women and rate them for fuckability? Because really? Most women are not doing that to you.
Yes. Yes we do. Are you telling me you've gotten to your advanced years without realising this fact.

We rate women for fuckability, the same way they rate us for being a good catch - except for the chicks who are already rating us for fuckability.

Honestly, the wilful ignorance of some of the women here is mind-boggling.


Don't presume to speak for me, stepchild.


That someone has reached your advanced years without gaining the necessary self-awareness to be honest about this issue is pathetic. There's no fool like an old fool.




_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 2:55:03 PM   
NocturnalStalker


Posts: 3858
Joined: 12/4/2010
Status: offline
quote:

I don't understand this given how he apparently goes out of his way to look feminine or at least genderbender.

edited to fix the quote thingies.


Lol, what?  I have long hair because I look horrible with short hair and it is general consensus that I look better with it shoulder-length and longer.  If it gets positive female attention, then I'm going to continue doing it. 

Facially, those are my natural features. 

The only thing I bend are knees when my voice hits a woman's ear.  Insert masculine flex here.




_____________________________

"The road I walk is paved in gold to glorify my platinum soul."

(in reply to TheFireWithinMe)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 4:25:22 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker]

Lol, what?  I have long hair because I look horrible with short hair and it is general consensus that I look better with it shoulder-length and longer.  If it gets positive female attention, then I'm going to continue doing it. 



Really? I thought you had long hair because you were a bit of a pansy, NS.

No offence - nothing against shirtlifters, myself. All part of life's rich tapestry, and stuff. :-)




_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to NocturnalStalker)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 4:36:21 PM   
TheFireWithinMe


Posts: 1672
Joined: 10/3/2011
From: The Depths of Hell
Status: offline
quote:

Lol, what?  I have long hair because I look horrible with short hair and it is general consensus that I look better with it shoulder-length and longer.  If it gets positive female attention, then I'm going to continue doing it. 


Long hair, sure but that style is distinctly feminine and in fact in both your pics - especially the one you don't use - you look very feminine/genderbender.

_____________________________

Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags

There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast. ~Author Unknown

(in reply to NocturnalStalker)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 4:55:43 PM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
njlauren, I haven't noticed your posts before.  Welcome to collarme, and thanks for sharing.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to TheFireWithinMe)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 6:03:34 PM   
NocturnalStalker


Posts: 3858
Joined: 12/4/2010
Status: offline
quote:

Really? I thought you had long hair because you were a bit of a pansy, NS.


I thought guys that had things stuffed up their rectum had repressed homosexual desires, PeonForHer.

quote:

Long hair, sure but that style is distinctly feminine and in fact in both your pics - especially the one you don't use - you look very feminine/genderbender.


You must be a recluse.  Go to Google and type in, "Guys with long hair."  When you're done feeling dumb, feel free to return to trying to sway my mind on befriending people with psychological problems.


_____________________________

"The road I walk is paved in gold to glorify my platinum soul."

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 6:38:08 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker

quote:

Really? I thought you had long hair because you were a bit of a pansy, NS.


I thought guys that had things stuffed up their rectum had repressed homosexual desires, PeonForHer.



I wouldn't know - it's never happened to me. Mind you, if I had any homosexual desires, I wouldn't bother to repress them.

Gawd, NS, you're making me feel so old!

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to NocturnalStalker)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 6:53:56 PM   
NocturnalStalker


Posts: 3858
Joined: 12/4/2010
Status: offline
You didn't have to say both my nicknames.


_____________________________

"The road I walk is paved in gold to glorify my platinum soul."

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 7:01:05 PM   
HeatherMcLeather


Posts: 2559
Joined: 5/21/2011
From: The dog house
Status: offline
He didn't you did, he just quoted you when you said "rectum" and "repressed".

Sorry, I couldn't resist, you left yourself wide open for that one.

(in reply to NocturnalStalker)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/14/2011 7:10:11 PM   
NocturnalStalker


Posts: 3858
Joined: 12/4/2010
Status: offline
You'd know all about leaving yourself wide open.

Boom roasted.


_____________________________

"The road I walk is paved in gold to glorify my platinum soul."

(in reply to HeatherMcLeather)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/15/2011 2:00:23 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wolf2Bear
Okay so a Female to Male is more acceptable than a male to female in regards to being passable? Why does this seem like a double standard here?  I have to wonder over a case where a M2F trans sought only your platonic friendship where or not you'd turn your back and walk away? I believe I interpret the OP's post is solely based on everyday interactions and not on a more intimate level. If the topic was strictly based on an intimate level then I can understand your post but that is not the case.
  Friendship doesn't work that way.   A M2F trans is simply not going to look for my friendship in the first place.  When people interact, there's an enormous component which is unspoken.  Body language, facial expressions and so on.  Any discomfort on my part will be read by the trans in question and if they're socially adept, they're simply not going to push it.

quote:

I don't know about your geographic area Awareness but in my local community, but I know and have met both and even from talking and spending time in their company, one would not be able to determine if they are M2F or F2M.
  F2M run the risk of looking like effeminate and/or homosexual men.  Hetero men can deal with them in that context if we're even remotely socialised.

M2F have to be really good to pass.  And if they can pass, then it's all good.  The problem here is that you've got trans individuals here who are saying very clearly that they want to look like some bizarre fusion of the sexes without anyone doing a double take.

Not going to happen.  Blaming nominal individuals in society and saying they're not sufficiently educated to deal with trans people is a cop-out.  People's responses are mostly instinctual and while we might enforce courtesy once our higher brain kicks into gear, you are never going to modify the human animal so their instinctual responses are going to vanish in a haze of gender neutrality.

Basically what I'm saying is that if a M2F is so good I can't detect it, then I don't care - unless we head into intimate territory - in which case, if I don't get a warning up front, I'll be mega-pissed.

  If the transition isn't good enough to pass undetected, then you're going to run into problems.  And that's just life.  People discriminate against others on the basis of height for fuck's sake.  You can't simply expect the human race to turn altruistic just for your own personal situation.  That's not how the world works.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Wolf2Bear)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/15/2011 3:55:55 AM   
stellauk


Posts: 1360
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

M2F have to be really good to pass.  And if they can pass, then it's all good.  The problem here is that you've got trans individuals here who are saying very clearly that they want to look like some bizarre fusion of the sexes without anyone doing a double take.



Being transgendered has got nothing to do with how someone looks, but who they are.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Not going to happen.  Blaming nominal individuals in society and saying they're not sufficiently educated to deal with trans people is a cop-out. 



I'm quoting this bit. You'll see why in a minute.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

People's responses are mostly instinctual and while we might enforce courtesy once our higher brain kicks into gear, you are never going to modify the human animal so their instinctual responses are going to vanish in a haze of gender neutrality.



This bit too, including the bit bolded for emphasis.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Basically what I'm saying is that if a M2F is so good I can't detect it, then I don't care -



If you cannot detect something, then how can you be aware that it exists? Or are you just talking about some abstract concept here?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

unless we head into intimate territory - in which case, if I don't get a warning up front, I'll be mega-pissed.



That's unlikely to happen, especially here, seeing as you've flagged up a massive warning to anyone who is transgendered. But please don't let me disturb you in making your assumptions.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

  If the transition isn't good enough to pass undetected, then you're going to run into problems. 



Being transgendered has got nothing to do with how you look, but who you are inside. You know there's these things called genes, chromosomes, DNA patterns, you can't see them.

The other thing is, nobody is under any obligation to be eye candy for anyone else - irrespective of whether they are transgendered or not. But I won't prevent you from playing the role of Captain Obvious nine pages into a thread which was inspired from another started by someone who is transgendered and experiencing problems.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

And that's just life.  People discriminate against others on the basis of height for fuck's sake.  You can't simply expect the human race to turn altruistic just for your own personal situation.  That's not how the world works.



Apologies once again for not fitting into your narrow definition of femininity, womanhood, life and the way everything should be.

But I've seen enough of your postings know to see what you think of women and how you perceive them so therefore it doesn't come as any surprise that you are less than accepting or understanding of the transgendered, particularly those who identify M2F.

But this much I will say. You know for all your bleating about life and 'dealing with shit' like everyone you're some distance from perfection, and it's perfectly apparent from your words to me, and I guess some others, that you've got quite some distance to go.

Now you can try and pin the blame for your issues - and they quite clearly are your issues - on others, such as the transgendered and M2F and keep arguing the point when all you are doing is blathering on about something you don't understand, you don't want to understand, and what's more you're making your issues much more visible to the others reading this thread. Suffice to say, people will also see a somewhat unfortunate choice of screen name.

I hope you don't mind my being so straightforward here, but seeing as you have so kindly volunteered for the role I couldn't resist the opportunity to making an example of you.

Almost invariably, and consistently throughout my own experience of being transgendered, the people who do have issues with the transgendered aren't being malicious towards them, they are just voicing their own issues when it comes to gender per se. This comes from having a very narrow or rigid (read inflexible) view of what gender actually is and what gender actually isn't. Their firm conviction that they are right and assumption that most people think like them prevents them from gaining any sort of real awareness or understanding of what it is actually all about.

It's the exact same way of thinking when it comes to people who object strongly to same sex relationships, the 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' brigade.

Generally speaking coming across someone who is transgendered isn't the norm (there's so few in relation to the wider population and as Awareness rightly points out people judge others on the way they look and this is instinctive) and it does take some people out of their comfort zone. This becomes more true and much more consistent the more intimate the perceived relationship or interaction becomes. Human nature, we become much more selective about those we wish to become intimate with the greater the intimacy.

However how the cisgendered person i.e. non-transgendered responds to this depends almost entirely on them and their personal outlook on life. While most cisgendered people probably wouldn't have a primary relationship with someone who is transgendered, or indeed share any real level of intimacy, they do recognize them as human, and once they've worked it out and worked out how they can relate to that person without making them feel uncomfortable, the problems disappear.

They also recognize that, even if they're not able to pass, even if you can tell or detect easily that they're transgendered, the simple fact that you can see them makes it clear that they are coping with life the best they can, facing up to their issues, and 'dealing with their shit'.

It's also got to be said that some do a bit better at dealing with their shit a second time round in the opposite gender than many people do in just one gender.


_____________________________

Usually when you have all the answers for something nobody is interested in listening.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/15/2011 4:43:18 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk

Being transgendered has got nothing to do with how you look, but who you are inside. You know there's these things called genes, chromosomes, DNA patterns, you can't see them.



stella, this reflects something else my sub has told me.  A TG defines their TG-ness by the dichotomy between their born gender and the gender they have between their ears.  In other words, it exists prior to HRT, prior to surgery.

To me and I presume almost all cisfolks, it doesn't "count" until transition.  It's like the old bit about the tree falling in the forest where nobody can hear it.


_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to stellauk)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/15/2011 5:07:00 AM   
OttersSwim


Posts: 2860
Joined: 9/1/2008
Status: offline
Sex is between the legs

Gender is between the ears


_____________________________

I am on a journey of authenticity and self.

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/15/2011 5:52:56 AM   
stellauk


Posts: 1360
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk

Being transgendered has got nothing to do with how you look, but who you are inside. You know there's these things called genes, chromosomes, DNA patterns, you can't see them.



stella, this reflects something else my sub has told me.  A TG defines their TG-ness by the dichotomy between their born gender and the gender they have between their ears.  In other words, it exists prior to HRT, prior to surgery.

To me and I presume almost all cisfolks, it doesn't "count" until transition.  It's like the old bit about the tree falling in the forest where nobody can hear it.



This is understandable, because what else have you got to go on? We live in a society defined by a binary system of sex and gender which are assumed to be unified.

There's some variance here between that point which you have said, the completion of the transition, and for others it's when you fully function in society as your acquired gender - work, friends, relationships, everything. Legal recognition comes two years or so after you officially change your identity which was done to make it easier to transition.

_____________________________

Usually when you have all the answers for something nobody is interested in listening.

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/15/2011 6:17:27 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OttersSwim

Sex is between the legs

Gender is between the ears



I agree with this statement, unfortunately some people will always equate gender with plumbing.

Which is why I was so very disappointed to learn that neither Awareness or NS answered my questions for them specifically. I asked them what exactly it was that made them male. Plumbing? Testosterone? Brain wiring?

I of course suspect it is plumbing. Well, here's the think about plumbing, although gender is determined by chromosome characteristics at conception, all babies start out the same, and all males retain their ovaries. Neat, huh?

From http://www.baby2see.com/gender/internal_genitals.html

Details of Genital Development.

During the first few weeks of fetus development, your baby's internal and external genital structures are the same, regardless of whether you are ultimately going to have a boy or a girl.

They have two sets of organs: one that can develop into the female sex organs (Mullerian duct) and one that can develop into the male sex organs (Wolffian ducts).


< Message edited by ChatteParfaitt -- 11/15/2011 6:18:15 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to OttersSwim)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/15/2011 6:33:19 AM   
LillyBoPeep


Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Basically what I'm saying is that if a M2F is so good I can't detect it, then I don't care -



If you cannot detect something, then how can you be aware that it exists? Or are you just talking about some abstract concept here?


I think that is what he's saying -- if he can't detect it, i.e. can't tell that it exists, and can sufficiently believe it doesn't exist, then it doesn't bother him, because the person goes into the "woman" category. so basically, yeah, it's like "if it doesn't seem to exist, then it's okay."
i think that's the way a good chunk of people are; regardless of whether or not they use the information to decide to be mean to a TG, or to be nice to them. people still quantify it based on how close you seem to be to "the goal," whatever that is. a lot of non-trans-people assume that you want to look as closely as possible, so they judge it based on how close you are to that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

unless we head into intimate territory - in which case, if I don't get a warning up front, I'll be mega-pissed.




That's unlikely to happen, especially here, seeing as you've flagged up a massive warning to anyone who is transgendered. But please don't let me disturb you in making your assumptions.


There was a question posted on Fetlife that asked if a TG woman who seduced a stereotypically intolerant straight man (the question defined particular parameters), and then told him, after sex, that she was born a man, was partially responsible for getting beat up for it.
It was kind of a touchy topic (though it didn't descend to CM-style madness, at least while I was paying attention. Most people agreed that there was a lie of omission on part of the TG, but that the man overreacted in his response, and should be held accountable for that. Some people likened it to sexual assault, and some people thought that the TG didn't have any responsibility to be upfront, ever.
I think the man would have a right to whatever his feeling was, even if it was negative. If he was angry, whatever, BUT by over-reacting and beating up or killing a person, he puts himself officially in the wrong.
quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk
The other thing is, nobody is under any obligation to be eye candy for anyone else - irrespective of whether they are transgendered or not.


This is very true, but unfortunately many people, particularly men, don't see it this way. I think this kind of thinking is why less-than-attractive women get treated badly -- they aren't doing their job of being a physically pleasing female for the random male gaze.

quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk
Almost invariably, and consistently throughout my own experience of being transgendered, the people who do have issues with the transgendered aren't being malicious towards them, they are just voicing their own issues when it comes to gender per se. This comes from having a very narrow or rigid (read inflexible) view of what gender actually is and what gender actually isn't. Their firm conviction that they are right and assumption that most people think like them prevents them from gaining any sort of real awareness or understanding of what it is actually all about.

It's the exact same way of thinking when it comes to people who object strongly to same sex relationships, the 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' brigade.

Generally speaking coming across someone who is transgendered isn't the norm (there's so few in relation to the wider population and as Awareness rightly points out people judge others on the way they look and this is instinctive) and it does take some people out of their comfort zone. This becomes more true and much more consistent the more intimate the perceived relationship or interaction becomes. Human nature, we become much more selective about those we wish to become intimate with the greater the intimacy.

However how the cisgendered person i.e. non-transgendered responds to this depends almost entirely on them and their personal outlook on life. While most cisgendered people probably wouldn't have a primary relationship with someone who is transgendered, or indeed share any real level of intimacy, they do recognize them as human, and once they've worked it out and worked out how they can relate to that person without making them feel uncomfortable, the problems disappear.

They also recognize that, even if they're not able to pass, even if you can tell or detect easily that they're transgendered, the simple fact that you can see them makes it clear that they are coping with life the best they can, facing up to their issues, and 'dealing with their shit'.


All of this -- most people I know, even if they don't agree with the TG's "TG-ness," they recognize that this is a human, the most important thing, and this person has a lot to deal with already on her plate, so why add more? Relate to that person as one human with issues to another human with issues. Nobody's life is perfect and neatly tucked away in nice little labeled boxes; some issues are thankfully not as apparent and broadcast to the world, as TG-ness can be.
MtFs have problems, i believe, because of this extremely narrow view of what constitutes "acceptable femininity," and if that definition were wider, I think there would be fewer problem. Hausboy mentioned a friend of his who was a biological woman but was constantly assumed to be MtF because, even though she was biologically female, she had features that people considered "unacceptable" for femininity.

I think if people can certainly go after whatever type of woman they want, but they should also be accepting of the basic humanity of women who may not be sexually appealing in the way they desire. Ultimately, i think that a lot of the problem is because of this. "Can I be sexually attracted to this person? No?! What the fuck?!!!"
You turn someone else's existence into an issue about you, and that's wrong.


_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica


(in reply to stellauk)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: The Transgender Thread - 11/15/2011 7:48:09 AM   
stellauk


Posts: 1360
Status: offline
Lilly

Thank you for coming back to me on that what I posted above.

If anything, if this is going to be a thread about 'transgendered' which serves to provide opportunities for people to understand a bit more or a bit better, then wouldn't it be better if that understanding was bilateral and went both ways?

It's like with the views expressed by Awareness and NS, they're equally valid and while yes they are issues, it's fair to point out that we all have our issues. We get them from living among other people, who also have issues, and there's nothing much you can do to avoid them but cut off all contact with society and live in a broom cupboard.

I know that they are issues because I have held almost the exact same views, way back when I was still desperately trying to cling onto the possibility of being an alpha male who just did a bit of crossdressing from time to time. It's hard to describe the confusion and also the trauma you go through when you discover that you're different, not like most other people, and other people are going to give you grief over it. I did the exact same thing in calling black white perhaps when everyone else around me could see that it was black, and I did what I could to argue my case.

This drove me deeper away from myself, and only served to make the issues far worse. Trust me, I've gone against myself and betrayed myself too many times than I'd care to admit, and I have spent more than my fair share of deceiving myself and others up to and including to the point where I have destroyed friendships and relationships and hurt people badly in ways they couldn't quite understand.

This was the epiphany, the light bulb moment, the realization that I was avoiding the truth and through this hurting other people and myself in the process. It also came about because, you can deceive yourself, you can deceive others, but you don't get to deceive everyone.

But part of the problem is the belief in the myths, that in seeking to become yourself other people see it that you're trying to become someone you're not, or that you are trying to gain this mythical advantage of being able to choose your sex and gender. All this focusses on the replacement of the penis with a vagina or vice versa. This is quite powerful in itself, and if it wasn't then maybe I wouldn't be asked so many times by different people if I have had the op, am having the op, or even when I intend to have the op.

This question comes up front, right at the start, and it's almost as if you can see the little wheels spinning in their minds preparing to work out how to relate to me. There's no other piece of information so vital to them as the answer which reveals what I've got between my legs.

How best can I present this in a way you might understand. It's like walking up to a guy and asking him, straight out, up front, 'Are you circumcised or not?' or to a woman 'Are you shaven or natural?' How big are your tits? How big is your dick? Imagine someone coming up to you and asking you that straight out. How would you feel?

But we're expected to reveal this and treat it just as casually as how are you feeling?

I will openly admit that sometimes it varies whether I pass or not. It isn't that much of an issue with me, and not only do I pass much better as a female than I ever did as a male it's probably something which is beyond me now. Passing isn't all about how you look, but it's also how you project and if you're not projecting right most people will pick up on it and react. Bottom line is I'm me and the me now is the real me.

I understand however that we all have to conform to gender stereotypes with regards to our appearance, but you know, it doesn't come overnight for most women and so - unless they have a body frame and karotype within the acceptable norm - it won't come overnight or immediately to many of the transgendered. Femininity is individual, it takes effort, work, which makes it somewhat harder in some ways for the M2F because anyone female are judged on their looks.

As for that discussion on Fet about the TG sleeping with a man. I kind of understand it, and I understand where I stand on it. Some see themselves as female and so feel that it's nobody else's business that they're TG, some use stealth successfully which avoids any problems. I take an alternative view. This is something which affects my whole life, it's part of who I am, and I'm not prepared to deny it for the sake of social acceptance. I actually find being up front about it with people who need to know is just as effective, and besides, it removes anyone who sees it as a problem right at the start. Anyone with whom I have any sort of intimate relationship I feel has a right to know as soon as possible.

The way i see it you're sharing intimacy with someone, intimacy involves trust, and any deception is likely to arouse a negative reaction from the person being deceived. No different from a woman finding out that her man has been intimate with another woman, or vice versa. People who aren't TG feel obliged to reveal stuff about themselves and their past, why not then someone who is TG?

This is the whole thing about the label. It's there, it qualifies my being female, it's a statement of fact. I'm not naturally born female and I have no wish to be. I'm quite comfortable being me.

I understand the bit about turning someone else's issue into one about you, which is why I have never disputed the validity of the views of Awareness or NS and they are perfectly entitled to think that way and express their views accordingly. I have dealings with people who think that way and I live among people in my area who feel the same. I have my own issues, they have their's, and the world turns and society functions just the same. Their choosing not to have anything to do with the transgendered is their own personal choice and doesn't diminish them as people in any way.

_____________________________

Usually when you have all the answers for something nobody is interested in listening.

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: The Transgender Thread Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094