RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal

RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

luckydawg -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:20:59 PM)
willbe, not sure what you mean by OEC.

mnottertail -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:21:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Bullshit Tazzy, Bush turned down Solyandras loan request. We have you on record as supporting lying aboutt what the scandal is, in an attempt to misdefine as not actually a scandal. If you want to pretend that is OWS approved, go for it. The vast majority of America knows that it is is. Too fuckin bad the W administration couldn't have read the real intel on WMD from the DIA without refuckingtardation, huh? Oh, well one out of two.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:21:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg willbe, not sure what you mean by OEC. The only thing she occupies is her Easy Chair. [:D]

mnottertail -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:23:29 PM)
You end up with any more relevance than a box of stale corn flakes yet? I thought not.

tazzygirl -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:25:01 PM)
Do you expect any convictions from this?

luckydawg -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:25:09 PM)
it chews at my ankle, what a disgusting little piece of asswipe.

mnottertail -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:27:29 PM)
You may be chewing your little peener off, there is not much more that you could invest in a conversation... isn't it sort of time for you to call 7.3.1?

luckydawg -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:27:35 PM)
tazz, we go it, you think if it aint illegal it aint nothing. Got it. And you support misdefining it, in order to minimize it. Got it. There was "no controlling leagal authority". How did that work out?

tazzygirl -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:28:18 PM)
I asked you a question. Do you expect convictions out of any of this?

luckydawg -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:29:27 PM)
little one the bitch troll (who whines to the mods) keeps chewing at my boot. What a useless little troll.

mnottertail -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:29:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg tazz, we go it, you think if it aint illegal it aint nothing. Got it. And you support misdefining it, in order to minimize it. Got it. There was "no controlling leagal authority". *How did that work out?* Seems to have worked out ok, all in all.

luckydawg -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:31:38 PM)
Tazz, I won't be able to answer that untill after the investigation is finished. Do you think that "Convictable Legality" is all that matters in Government subsidy of executives?

mnottertail -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:32:49 PM)
Yes, otherwise most all current 'republicans' (and to think about it, all since Nixon) would be incarcerated.

luckydawg -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:33:52 PM)
"little one"s fixation with me really is kind of gross, it has asswipe all over its face. Just desperatly wants my attention. nasty little thing, it whines to the Mods.

luckydawg -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:35:06 PM)
Tazz, I asked you a question. I answered yours, are you going to answer mine? Do you think that "Convictable Legality" is all that matters in Government subsidy of executives?

mnottertail -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:36:07 PM)
Why do you spout such asswipe at yourself? Is it because you have nothing of import? Or are you of such clownishly inept nature no one will converse with you?

luckydawg -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:38:19 PM)
of course anyone reading the thread has seen Tazzy and I go several layers deep in conversation on this issue, as well as several other posters speaking with me. But"little one" (hte troll who whines to mods) lives in a silly fantasy world of pretend.

mnottertail -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:40:26 PM)
I have not seen anything beyond lying and pretending from the 7.3.1. whiners.

popeye1250 -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:41:22 PM)
Not a scandal eh? Ok, cool, then Solyndra and it's board of directors shouldn't have any problems returning that money to the U.S. Treasury,.....right?

mnottertail -> RE: The Phony Solyndra Scandal (11/27/2011 1:44:11 PM)
When Boeing, and BP, and Exxon, and all the railroads, the insurance industry, pharma, Haliburton, Brown and Root and USSteel and all others in turn have, I am sure we can get them to throw in a couple of bucks....

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875