Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 12:33:10 PM   
SuzeQ


Posts: 253
Joined: 10/16/2011
From: Under her wing
Status: offline
quote:

Do people who are involved in BDSM, most especially the sadism and masochism aspects, have more emotional and mental "issues" than the general population?
I don't think so, I haven't noticed it, but I haven't a lot of data to go on.

quote:

Is a proclivity towards sadism or masochism a result of past (childhood) trauma?
I'll have to say no, all 4 of us have some inclination in that regard, but none of us had any childhood trauma, the closest we come is Heather, but her su8bmissiveness preceded her episode with her uncle.

quote:

Is subbing to someone always damaging to the ego on some level?
Is subbing only damaging if humiliation, degradation and debasement are involved?
No idea, I wonder that myself sometimes, but I have to say that with my limited experience with submissives I would have to say no, but that could be due to a very limited sample.

quote:

Is sadism *always* the result of hating your "victim" on some level, while masking it as "love?"
No, I completely disagree with this idea. I used to ask this same question when I first discovered I enjoyed causing pain to others but I don't anymore. We went to a friend's place where I had the chance to flog somebody other than one of the other Haytchies, and I really didn't like it much, it seemed cold and just unpleasant. It was missing the intimacy that exists when I spank or flog one of the people I love. And I do love them, I don't hate them, or at least if I do hate them, its a deeply subconscious hate I am unaware of. Also, seeing the way Hannah adores Heather, there is no doubt in my mind that that is love, as real and true a love as I have ever seen and not a mask for anything.

quote:

If a sub lives for humiliation, degradation, objectification, and debasement, is this *always* the result of poor self esteem?
I don't know, but I am inclined to say not always, or at least it can remain after the self-esteem issue has been overcome. Both Cheri and Heather enjoy some aspects of those activities, yet neither has poor self-esteem. Cheri never did, and while Heather did, she no longer does. If anything she could stand to have slightly less self-esteem.

quote:

I do think that those who like extreme sadomasochist play, such as breaking bones, or extreme degradation play, like eating scat (sorry) have some stuff they need to deal with. That these acts are consensual does not make them "sane" to me. But that is my opinion.
I'm more or less in Hannah's camp on this question; none of this stuff we do is really sane, to use her phrase, we're all sick little fucks.

And that's my opinion, as it stands without having read the rest of the thread.


(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 12:35:53 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
From Gungadin:

quote:

However extreme their activities are, it's impossible to tell whether someone is SANE, except on a case by case basis. Having said that, i don't believe the notion that kinksters are no different from the rest of the world, except for kink.

pam



From Lily:

quote:

On Fet, I've seen some people who do make me wonder if their humilation/degredation things are healthy -- for example, a very, veeeryy obese woman, who wants humiliation from anyone who happens by her profile, based on how fat she is. I admit, I do wonder sometimes if that's her way of trying to "turn a negative into a positive." I dunno. Maybe she let herself get so fat BECAUSE she wanted to be humilated for it? It's not always an easy "cart before the horse" scenario.

and

There are some things, like the recent breeding thread, that generally rub people the wrong way, and fall into the "wrong" category -- mostly on the grounds that it harms someone else who isn't a party to the original game. But I don't think most people are doing things like tha


From Areinos:

quote:

I find that interesting, I am big, muscular, my father, grandfather and uncles are all big, nature made us that way and we all cater to the women in our lives but if I were to tell my father he was submissive he would disown me and view me as mentally unstable.


I agree with all three of the above posters, and think each pov is fodder for further discussion.



_____________________________



(in reply to gungadin09)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 12:41:01 PM   
curiousslave90


Posts: 1
Joined: 2/24/2011
Status: offline
What an amazingly interesting discussion.

Personally, I believe that there are firm links with one's past and their bdsm interests.

Take me for example, I'm still pretty young but through out most of my teenage life, have suffered depression as a result of always being an 'outsider'.
I'm still a pretty normal guy as in I get good college grades and I am reasonably intelligent and seemingly sane.
My strongest sexual desire is to be ultimately destroyed?
I don't know, but I constantly see links with my personality and my past. Enough to make me think that these fetishes I now have are a result of what has happened to me and that I am now 'damaged'.

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 1:32:50 PM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
I don't think think the things that people do are *always* anything.

Bdsm is a challenge for me. Being owned falls into that category, to a degree.  Things like tackling a tricky piece of music, or a cycle route that's just beyond my fitness level do too.

I've got dings, of course. Just like my car and my favourite rucksack, I've been through some potholes and been dropped and dragged about a bit....but just like them, I'm still functional just a little tattier over the years.

It's a bit like Bob the Builder for me. Can she do it?? YES, she can..:)

agirl


_____________________________

See how easy it can be?

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 1:53:43 PM   
RexCorvus


Posts: 84
Joined: 11/27/2011
Status: offline

Obviously I can only answer for myself and, to some extent, from observations of folks I've known intimately who were into BDSM. (I could also answer based on what I've seen in movies, but I'm pretty sure drawing conclusions from late-night Cinemax offerings is a bad idea). FWIW I'm a switch, so I come at this from both sides of the kneel.

I'm not going to go question by question, but answer generally: I'm pretty sure the answer to the "always" statements is no. Sadism is not always the result of childhood trauma, subbing is not always ego damaging, sadists don't always hate their victims, and BDSM folks don't always carry a lot of emotional or mental issues. FWIW my childhood was trauma free - intact and happy family, no abuse, nothing that you could point to and say "Okay, there's where his personality got bent into a kinky shape". I just realized as I became sexually aware that I really liked dominance and submission. It took a little longer to come to terms with the idea that I'm sexually sadistic, but that doesn't come from a hatred of my partner. For me it's a part of dominance - not only can I make you do and say what I want to, not only can I use you sexually however I wish, I can cause you physical pain and there's nothing you can do about it. It's more of a "Go me!" than a "Fuck you".

As for subbing to someone, I've never found that damaging to my ego. The people I've dominated have seemed to emerge with egos unscathed as well. And I've definitely been involved in some serious humiliation play, both as victim and perp.

Now it could be pointed out that I do BDSM more casually than a lot of folks. I'm not a 24/7 person, for me BDSM is more of a bedroom/playtime thing. It could be that people for whom it's a lifestyle are more likely to have suffered trauma, but I don't have any data points for that. I could definitely see how someone might use BDSM as a coping mechanism, and thus it could be that some cases of trauma lead to someone being a bondage enthusiast. But probably the same could be true for all kinds of activities, and I don't know if there would be any statistical significant correlation between trauma and BDSM.

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 4:51:20 PM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline
fr

for me it's based alot on my childhood. my thing for kidnapping came from wanting to run away from home and not having the guts because when found and returned i knew my mum would make my life more hell than it was. if kidnapped it wouldn't be my fault, i'd have a better life (i was a very small child and couldn't see anything worse than what i was already in) but if found and returned to my family i couldn't be blamed and punished. as i got older i added the sexual eliment to it, again to remove guilt from how i felt considering what i's already gone through.

as i got older i see that i was putting myself in a submissive position with the above and it has been one of my greatest fantacies. i told no-one about it because i felt guilty and that there was alot wrong with me. on the other side of it, with actual men i would get that stomach flip of excitement as they moved over the top of me and from that menacing 'i can pin you now and there's nothing you can do about it' side of things. however, that scared the crap out of me at the same time and i had huge issues with any sort of restraint. i wanted to be the one in control just so they couldn't be. i do get alot of pleasure from inflicting pain if the other person likes it and i can direct play if i want too. the thing is though, it was all because i never trusted someone to give myself over to their control. i couldn't even do it for my ex, i loved him tremendously but didn't trust him enough to give him everything even though i'd trusted him more than anyone else.

now though, i'm in a position where i have someone who has everything of me. he is exploring his sadistic side while i'm exploring my submissive side. he can restrain me however he likes, and has done. he inflicts pain on me in various forms that we both love. our play is very mixed up with both of us being very switchy within any session of play. it does feel very natural to be like this with him.

on the other hand. my friend has had no trauma in her life and a really good childhood. she still has the rape fantacies and would love to find a guy who would punch her and be rough with her. she's filthy to the max and very level about it all.

needles

(in reply to RexCorvus)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 5:57:33 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk


quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

Do people who are involved in BDSM, most especially the sadism and masochism aspects, have more emotional and mental "issues" than the general population?



I'm not sure that I or anyone else can draw such a conclusion with any degree of reliability. We all have issues, both emotional and mental, to varying degrees, and my own personal criteria when making such judgements is how self-aware the person is of their issues, what do they do to either compensate or discount those issues, and how much those issues impact on their ability to function in life and in relationships.

My own personal view is that emotional and mental issues only really become a problem when there is some degree of dysfunction which impacts on a relationship or their ability to function, e.g. work.

I also don't make any distinction between people involved in WIITWD and people out there in wider society. We're all the same - just people - and while our involvement in our respective subcultures that make up WIITWD may influence our attitudes and thinking - especially in terms of relationships - we still remain the same people more or less.

What differs, which is something one might find in other areas of culture, such as art, music, the performing arts, is that we have some opportunity of an outlet to express ourselves and those issues by means which can bring something beneficial to other people than ourselves.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

Is a proclivity towards sadism or masochism a result of past (childhood) trauma?



Possibly it is, but unless we have shared experience with that particular person in their childhood and followed them through life we can only go by what they tell us and that what we assume by filling in the blanks and comparisons with our own life experiences.

It also need not be from trauma experienced in childhood, but also as a result of the traumatic experiences gained from abuse in previous relationships. I believe that issues develop from our relationships per se, both with ourselves and with other people. We learn how to deal with those issues from ...erm.. um.. our relationships with others and with ourselves. Relationships happen in cycles, and are themselves nothing more than a complex mass of cycles of interaction, ritual, habit, and communication. From a certain perspective it's a kind of undulating vicious circle which yes, at times does make life quite vicious in itself.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

Is subbing to someone always damaging to the ego on some level?



Not necessarily. In my case it gave me the opportunity to explore and examine my own gender issues in the context of a relationship - while there's been a link between the two they have always been very clear and very distinct (separate) parts of me and by extension, it allowed me to redefine myself and discover a new purpose in life that I failed to identify due to my confusion as to who or what I am. But at that stage it was service and the relationships were more symbiotic than perhaps later.

I'm more of the opinion that submission to the wrong person for the wrong reasons can always be potentially damaging and sometimes when used to address an issue can create an even bigger issue.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

Is subbing only damaging if humiliation, degradation and debasement are involved?



I cannot offer any meaningful or reliable insight here. I might have wanted in the past to be humiliated or degraded but it's not my thing and I've been trained and conditioned so well to have a mindset that my submission through service comes from dignity, honour and integrity and to reject such things as humiliation or degradation.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

Is sadism *always* the result of hating your "victim" on some level, while masking it as "love?"



I have no opinion. I'm not a sadist.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

If a sub lives for humiliation, degradation, objectification, and debasement, is this *always* the result of poor self esteem?



I don't live for these things, but I suffer from unreliable self-appraisal issues and can suffer sudden losses of self-esteem and self-confidence. For me personally to experience humiliation or debasement would only serve to feed my emotional masochism, justifying it and enabling it. I address my own self-esteem issues either through my creative work or creative self-expression or through my service to others because it is through this I have learned to validate myself and overcome the issue. I'm a great believer in personal responsibility and ownership of my issues and while at times I may seek validation from others I feel that I am also responsible for being able to validate myself through my own actions.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

My opinions on these questions can be summed up fairly easily. First, everyone has issues, since no one gets to have a perfect childhood or lead a perfect life. We all have our baggage.



I agree. I wish at times I could morph into Heathrow Airport just so that some of the baggage can disappear.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I don't think people who practice BDSM necessarily have more baggage than the general population. I think this all depends on how you deal with those issues. If you hide behind your issues and never really explore why you are the way you are, than you are going to be a BDSM practitioner who is perhaps dangerous to yourself and others. If you see it as your life's work to resolve your issues (as I do) I think it can enhance your life and aid some of that resolution.



To me change is the only constant in our lives. We change because our relationships change which change us and we change as a result. Life and relationships I believe occur in complex cycles and sometimes to overcome an issue it requires repeated attempts of going through a cycle of broken relationships or attempts - we're all living by trial and error and each new relationship takes us back to the beginning.

I also believe that there's a spiritual element too, and perhaps we also have relationships beyond the physical into the metaphysical. Sometimes life throws us a curve ball and our lives and relationships just seem to crumble and collapse and we are all of a sudden facing a bigger issue, a crisis, and this is when we need to overcome the issues we have and somehow learn and progress. If we don't the same situation keeps coming back, and it will keep coming back until we overcome those issues.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I do think that those who like extreme sadomasochist play, such as breaking bones, or extreme degradation play, like eating scat (sorry) have some stuff they need to deal with. That these acts are consensual does not make them "sane" to me.



I was discussing something similar with someone (another poster) recently on the topic of sadists.

I'm of the view that, as we all have issues, there is often a degree of codependency in our relationships which may be mild or insignificant or it may be more significant. I'm of the view that yes, people can work with each other's issues in such codependency and this is par for course in any relationship, where after the initial attraction and chemistry we make a value judgment on someone's bad habits, inadequacies, weaknesses, vulnerabilities and issues in deciding whether to continue the relationship or not. In such a case where there's not much dysfunction codependency can exist in the form of 'working on oneself' with the emotional support of the other.

However I draw the line at dysfunction - issues which impact either on the person themselves or on others in such a way so as to impair their ability to function in a relationship. Therefore I don't accept that BDSM is an acceptable substitute for receiving professional help and support.

BDSM isn't to me just about consent, whether it be RACK or SSC but it's also about personal responsibility and the ability to foresee or make allowances for unforeseen consequences.

This is where sadism here in BDSM differs from the sadism of some of those sitting on Death Row awaiting execution. Nothing to do with consent, but to do with intention, motivation, personal responsibility and dealing with the consequences.

You see when you get into the extreme S/M stuff there are cases where, while the person might not die, they can end up severely or permanently damaged, not necessarily through injury, but emotionally, psychologically. And it doesn't have to take much to put someone in that state. I know a few sadists who are into that extreme stuff and generally they are people who are in complete control, rational, and very much aware of people and the sorts of issues people have.




What can I say? As usual, a well thought out and most excellent post. I agreed with everything, but really liked your take on co-dependency. That is a term that gets a bad rap (like the word manipulation) when really all relationships are codependent to a more or lesser degree and to a negative or positive degree.

I know for my own self that being submissive to another means giving up a great deal of my pride and my ego, and for me, that's a good thing. It makes me a much better, more well rounded person. For whatever reason, this is not something I do on my own. On my own I am far too type A to even be healthy physically, to say nothing of emotionally.

However, being with a dominant male who gets me allows me the freedom to express all those hidden emotional sides. I am softer, more feminine, more compassionate and caring.  I'm better. I'm a nicer person.

Do you call than co-dependency? I think you do. But it is certainly not negative.



_____________________________



(in reply to stellauk)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 6:03:04 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
This is from Reform (post #14)

quote:

~Is subbing only damaging if humiliation, degradation and debasement are involved?

Possibly? I'm not really into humiliation because it does bring me down. Others seem to really enjoy it and it doesn't bother them.


I pulled this part of your post out because you specifically mention that humiliation brings you down.

I don't mean to be obtrusive, but could you possibly expand and clarify that? And I don't want to ask more b/c I'd like your words, your thoughts, w/o my own possibly skewing your response.

TY


_____________________________



(in reply to Reform)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 6:17:56 PM   
Reform


Posts: 151
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

This is from Reform (post #14)

quote:

~Is subbing only damaging if humiliation, degradation and debasement are involved?

Possibly? I'm not really into humiliation because it does bring me down. Others seem to really enjoy it and it doesn't bother them.


I pulled this part of your post out because you specifically mention that humiliation brings you down.

I don't mean to be obtrusive, but could you possibly expand and clarify that? And I don't want to ask more b/c I'd like your words, your thoughts, w/o my own possibly skewing your response.

TY



Certainly. It's sort of hard to describe, but when humiliated I believe it a little too much. It's not a game to me, and it legitimately hurts my feelings. Perhaps that means I have some self-esteem issues, but I don't think I do. I just don't like being made fun of, in any situation. So humiliation for me is too real to be any fun. If BDSM is supposed to be about fun, why should I tolerate something I don't enjoy for the sake of my partner, when we can just do things we both enjoy? That's kind of how I see it. On the other hand, I do sometimes like to be objectified (which is sort of similar I guess), as long as it's not tied with being made fun of or put down.

Overall it's not for me, but I know of many people who really enjoy it, and it doesn't seem to affect them the same way as it does me. So it's damaging in that way to me, at least potentially, but not others. I didn't want to say humiliation is always damaging, as I just know myself, not everyone.

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 6:29:59 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
Thank you so much for your further response.

And yes I get what you mean.

Humiliation for me is something I either love or hate. It depends on the humiliation.

My man calling me his slut, or his bad pussy, just turns me on. I know I am a slut for him, that is just fact, and hearing those words from him floats my boat big time.

Now if he humiliated me about my age, or my weight, or my sense of direction, I would have issues, b/c I would hate that.

Do I have self esteem issues about my sense of direction? I don't know. I know I have no sense of direction, again it is a fact of who I am that I can't change. But to make fun of that in a negative way I would find belittling. (He makes fun of my sense of direction in a non-negative way all the time).

Humiliation is just so darned personal. And as with some many things in human relations, INTENT seems to play a big part.


_____________________________



(in reply to Reform)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 6:43:50 PM   
Reform


Posts: 151
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt
My man calling me his slut, or his bad pussy, just turns me on. I know I am a slut for him, that is just fact, and hearing those words from him floats my boat big time.

Now if he humiliated me about my age, or my weight, or my sense of direction, I would have issues, b/c I would hate that.


Agree 100% on this. Slut, pussy, sex-toy = yum for me. But anorexic, little, helpless, etc = hate. I don't like to be made to feel "small" or "little" or worthless, whereas I am worth a lot as his slut, to continue that example. It really does depend greatly on intent, in my mind at least. Others are seemingly able to separate that intent out of their play, or know that it's just words and not reality, but I do not find there to be a difference for me personally.

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 6:50:57 PM   
Toppingfrmbottom


Posts: 6528
Joined: 6/7/2009
Status: offline
It is for me. I may had turned out kinky anyway with out all the sexual aand emotional verbal and physical abuse anyways, buut but I certainly feeel i am kinky and into what i am because the abuse.
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt



Is a proclivity towards sadism or masochism a result of past (childhood) trauma?






_____________________________

One world under lube with vibrators and dildo's for all! quote from the sex toy 101 book

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 6:57:51 PM   
LillyBoPeep


Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline
For me, somehow feeling bad was part of it for me. If M spit in my face, it shocked me and made me feel bad or cry. If he called me a "fucking bitch," it made me feel very low. But somehow, for me, that was where the power of it was. It's not something I see myself doing casually, like the very obese woman I mentioned earlier. it was possible because of the connection, but you know, I did have bad self-esteem before I met him. That relationship actually built my self esteem up, because somehow giving him ownership of those things, and knowing how he felt about me actually diffused a lot of the self-generated stuff. It made it something we could explore. He could tear me down, but he always built me right back up, and made me stronger.

_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica


(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 7:03:55 PM   
stellauk


Posts: 1360
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

Do you call than co-dependency? I think you do. But it is certainly not negative.



Would inter-dependency be better? I was actually being neutral when I was referring to co-dependency earlier and your point here has made me wonder whether it was appropriate for a choice of word in what I posted.

To me a successful relationship is a bit like a picture made up from two different jigsaw puzzles. It's not perfect by any means, and it might not be complete, but the important thing here is that it is an image made up of two separate jigsaw puzzles where all the pieces somehow are made to fit together to create the whole picture.

We are all carrying some sort of baggage and issues from the past, and together with this we all have strengths and weaknesses, also things we know and understand better than other things. We are all following some sort of Life Script towards a general objective or purpose in life, we all have our own perception of who we are, and we constantly modify this in terms of our current reality and interactions mainly by way of discounting and compensating.

We do the same in our relationships, and where one isn't good at something or is weak the other either discounts or compensates to maintain the unity and cohesion in the relationship. This is what I was referring to by codependency.

Another example was some time back when I served a domme who had come out of a violent, abusive marriage. I'm not a great masochist or painslut by any means, but whenever she felt the need we would go to the bedroom and she would beat the crap out of me and she would do it with anger, rage, and quite a few other nasty and ugly emotions. Now to some I guess that would cross the lines into abuse and it was me who offered to do this, which I guess would be co-dependency, but I would rather it came out and be expressed than be left to fester within.

I'm okay with doing this because I'm able to transform negative energy into positive energy and can function in some ways like a human shock absorber.
I don't look at stuff like this as what's negative or positive, but what is necessary or beneficial in the circumstances.




_____________________________

Usually when you have all the answers for something nobody is interested in listening.

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/1/2011 11:01:13 PM   
SailingBum


Posts: 3225
Joined: 12/10/2007
From: Sailin the stormy sea
Status: offline
This question seems to come up every 6 months or so. I ve heard similar reasoning for "born again Christians" being somehow messed up in childhood. The problem being that no 2 ppl can agree what a "normal" childhood is nor can they agree on what BDSM is, it's all to subjective. Therein lies the problem. Until you can get the "masses" to agree on the definition this question can't be answered.

As you see by the replies each person has their own reason for labeling themselves BDSM / whatever.

Im going with Im one normal sonofbitch that enjois among many things slapping da hot bitches around. So do I fall into the BD SM or whatever category??? The point is it doesn't really matter to me I do it cuz i like it.

BadOne

< Message edited by SailingBum -- 12/1/2011 11:07:01 PM >


_____________________________

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

According to SwithNSpanky
We are all so very lucky to have you with us to impart your great wisdom.

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/2/2011 12:31:27 AM   
MrBukani


Posts: 1920
Joined: 4/18/2010
Status: offline
You SB fall in the category SOB that loves SHB.
But normal? you? really?
Nah I don't think so...

(in reply to SailingBum)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/2/2011 7:09:08 AM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
Heck, I'd rather see a proclivity for BDSM as a cause for future trauma.
That sounds like so much more fun


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/2/2011 7:20:53 AM   
easterlilly


Posts: 6
Joined: 11/29/2011
Status: offline
I would have to agree with the general consensus that "always" is a word that shouldn't be used in  describing why a large group of people do anything. I would like to add that I believe it is extremely and sadly more common that people ignore there, lets call them"baser" urges. For the majority of my very short time living I have judged myself to the point of depression. Being only 27 that means I've wasted the so called best years of my life. I was raised by a feminist and I watched her go toe to toe with every man who ever tried to belittle her including my father. ( I don't think my my father realized he was doing it) I have also always been far to independent, to the point where it's a little unhealthy, so I've always shunned my needs to have a dominant male in my life. Because of that I almost married a man who I subconsciously handed more and more power to. I became weaker and hit a bit of an identity crisis. It got to the point that I wished for death. Thank god he was the type of guy who didn't want that power and we split on good terms. I was very lucky. Now that I am embracing my true desires I see that my need to submit stems from a want to trust someone enough to let go of my own judgments. And, my desire to dominate someone stems from wanting to be needed and utterly responsible for another persons happiness.
I fear that there are far to many people out there ignoring there true needs for whatever reason.

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/2/2011 11:27:43 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
FR:

I want to thank everyone for their responses so far. This has been a great topic and I have quite a few people I want to respond to once I get my thoughts in order.

So, I do intend to get back to the thread as my time and thoughts allow.




_____________________________



(in reply to easterlilly)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? - 12/2/2011 11:34:23 AM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
quote:

Chatte Parfait

I know for my own self that being submissive to another means giving up a great deal of my pride and my ego, and for me, that's a good thing. It makes me a much better, more well rounded person. For whatever reason, this is not something I do on my own. On my own I am far too type A to even be healthy physically, to say nothing of emotionally.

However, being with a dominant male who gets me allows me the freedom to express all those hidden emotional sides. I am softer, more feminine, more compassionate and caring.  I'm better. I'm a nicer person.



I want to thank you for this part, Chatte. This is the other side of "me" and why dominance appeals to me. I don't operate well on my own. I need to be a role model, someone that someone ELSE is looking to, being proud of, whatever. I don't have a lot of inner motivation to be the best Hibbie for MYSELF, my motivation is to take care of someone else, and by extension, make myself all shiny so I can do that well.

I'm not sure if I'm nicer, that's for other folks to decide, but I know that I do feel more solid when I have RESPONSIBILITY for someone else.

YAY codependency!

< Message edited by LadyHibiscus -- 12/2/2011 11:35:10 AM >


_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is the proclivity for BDSM a result of past trauma? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109