samboct -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/19/2011 6:42:08 AM)
|
FF Ph.D. in chemistry- and yes, I've done work on large studies of a population. I'm not going to give more detail since the study was in a specific area and I'll show up as an author. The nature of the approach, i.e. letter and cash incentive already suggests that there may be a self selection of respondents taking place. Using round numbers- 1,000 people get a letter asking them to take part in a study on rape. Roughly one quarter (I think I have that right) respond. What about the people who didn't respond? Did they think-gee, I wasn't raped, why should I participate? Or did they think that gee- I've been raped, don't want to talk about it, don't want to take part. You can't know either way- but based on what potential letter was sent -and if it was from the authors of the survey- odds are you'd figure out that it's a survey on rape, wouldn't you? In terms of interviewers- a whopping 18 hours of training...wow...and in 25 minutes, you're going to get enough information to have a lot of faith in it? The other problem with such a survey is although it's statistically easy to quantify the data, the type of questionnaire approach often misses a lot compared to a less structured interview. Plus, there can be bias based on the survey questions, which I didn't see. Often the design of the question and the language used gives you an idea of the answer the interviewer is looking for- notorious in political polls. People responses vary on whether or not they like the interviewer. I know in medicine, that clinical trials for psych meds are being designed in a very sophisticated fashion to be given over to people that are poorly trained (cheap) and that these trials are often deeply flawed- that the person conducting the trial doesn't have the experience to figure out whether the diagnosis was correct, whether the patient was compliant, and whether or not there are any side effects- that type of work used to be done by highly trained individuals, but it was too expensive. This report has all the hallmarks of a large, cheaply and quickly done, survey that will probably reflect the bias of the survey writer. How do you get someone to trust you with the intimate details of their sex life in less than half an hour? With all that being said though, there are probably some areas of the report where if the conclusions cannot be fully trusted, due to the biases noted above, the report does provide some interesting looks at the nature of rape. Angelika- the report does go into the relationships and the number of rapists victims have. As noted before, roughly half (or more) of female victims were raped prior to age 18 by someone they knew. This implies a family member. As such, it's hard to conceive of how family members could be serial rapists with large numbers of victims. I think there may be a vast gulf in between the people being reported as rapists in this study, and rapists in the general prison population. Right now, I'd be very interested in someone in the field's analysis of how to reconcile those seemingly disparate facts and whether people taking part in this study would actually have considered themselves raped- or whether that was a definition that the survey supplied. Also- please accept my respect as someone who has the strength to come forward and share your experiences from a trying ordeal. On the thread topic- I think I mentioned in previous posts about how Dartmouth dealt with what would now be called a hate crime- the supposed prank of the Review's masthead with an anti semitic slogan and "apology". I am reminded by the campus rabbi's response which he discussed on the Green, upon learning that one of his students was a member of the Review. The student came to him with a request to drop the course, because he thought the rabbi would flunk him. The rabbi assured the student that he would get the grade that his work deserved- and that he would likely get an A since his work to that point had been very good. The rabbi's comment was that as educators- our job is to teach our students- and that some need more teaching than others. I find it unfortunate that most schools and unfortunately many of the posters here do not share his wisdom. Sam
|
|
|
|