SilverBoat
Posts: 257
Joined: 7/26/2006 Status: offline
|
What if the Dom/sub factor is removed from the question? Suppose that it's reframed as any one person doing damage to another's self-esteem, via intentional (or accidental) humiliation? Sure, it'd be easy to begin a litany of maybe thousands of examples where that occurs to millions of people, outside of the kinked setting we're discussing here. Everything from verbal or physical abuse between whole nations or ethnic groups, to abusively disfunctional boss/worker, parent/child, gang/scapegoat, spouse/victim relationships. In some cases, there have been whole nations egging-on the humiliation, convinced that some crime (excess pride sometimes) justifies the 'superior' group taking the other group down a peg. And there's been serious arguments made that bashing down conquered groups' self-esteem makes them less likely to revolt, fight back, etc. And the groups arguing that claimed the moral high-ground because it saved their members' lives, affirmed the natural human order, blah, blah. In the course of history, though, there's often been some mass-murderous or global-warfare repercussions to that. Scaling those contexts to individual relationships, though, and even to the Dom/sub situation of the OP, I'd have to opine that attacking self-esteem is at least ethically questionable, if not fraught with moral and practical hazards. Even in high-level peer-peer negotiations, one of the basic tenets is to leave the other party a face-saving 'out' when you've got them legally or financially cornered. And as much as I understand the frisson of schadenfreude, when somebody who's self-esteem seems undeservedly elevated stumbles, between two people who at least supposedly have a constructive personal relationship and stake in each other's well-being, undermining self-esteem doesn't look like it would ever be productive. Yeah, there is humiliation 'play', and some people get off to that, even thrive on it as proof that they're strong enough to endure, or of dedication, or whatever. (I don't 'get' it, not My kink, on either side, but not gonna judge). But if it's intentionally, or even tangentially, diminishing their self-esteem, that doesn't seem to qualify as "healthy" and could be "harm." That's rehashing what some other folks have posted, I'm sure, and maybe not as clearly stated or conclusive as I'd prefer, but I'm still pondering about the matter. On both gut-level grokking and thought-through basis, taking-down self-esteem seems fundamentally wrong, even or especially in D/s context. SB
|