quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

That's a good line of Hemmingway's (and parroting a still better line of Twain's), but it's still a fact that Hemmingway style underwriting has proved a far more pernicious influence on American literature than Faulkner style over writing in the long run. Hemmingway made a point of using exactly the right word rather than rambling around it with a phrase or two, which is the sort of minimalism that works.

Besides, he was a man who took a lot of care and effort in his use of English, so a load of blather about Hemingway isn't really an excuse for somebody who can't spell, doesn't have a clue about grammar, and couldn't write a clear and communicative sentence if their life depended on it, is it? That isn't a style that's been pared of all fripperies and irrelevances, it's just ill mannered contempt for whoever you're trying to talk with, and there's no excuse for that.

Conrad is, I believe, considered the best writer in the English language, Hemmingway is adolescent by comparison, at least in terms of content. Henry James is sometimes mentioned, but even I have difficulty following the Shakespearan complexities of his prose.

I have been compared to Faulkner myself, not necessarily favorably. [&o]

In short, there is a distinction between saying something and having something meaningful to say, and while there is certainly a threshold of articulation vs. confusion, intelligence covers both expression and comprehension - also raised is the issue of character, intelligence, per se, doesn't axiomatically correlate with educational level, the world is full of highly educated, insincere, self centered assholes.

Not does character correlate with wealth, but that's another subject.

quote:

Scnce tlls m tht y cn rd nd cmprhnd ths sntnc vn thgh t cntns n vwls.

quote:

Discounting someone because they dont use the "proper" forms of grammar or punctuation means I would miss out on a whole lot of great information.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

That's a good line of Hemmingway's (and parroting a still better line of Twain's), but it's still a fact that Hemmingway style underwriting has proved a far more pernicious influence on American literature than Faulkner style over writing in the long run. Hemmingway made a point of using exactly the right word rather than rambling around it with a phrase or two, which is the sort of minimalism that works.

Besides, he was a man who took a lot of care and effort in his use of English, so a load of blather about Hemingway isn't really an excuse for somebody who can't spell, doesn't have a clue about grammar, and couldn't write a clear and communicative sentence if their life depended on it, is it? That isn't a style that's been pared of all fripperies and irrelevances, it's just ill mannered contempt for whoever you're trying to talk with, and there's no excuse for that.

Conrad is, I believe, considered the best writer in the English language, Hemmingway is adolescent by comparison, at least in terms of content. Henry James is sometimes mentioned, but even I have difficulty following the Shakespearan complexities of his prose.

I have been compared to Faulkner myself, not necessarily favorably. [&o]

In short, there is a distinction between saying something and having something meaningful to say, and while there is certainly a threshold of articulation vs. confusion, intelligence covers both expression and comprehension - also raised is the issue of character, intelligence, per se, doesn't axiomatically correlate with educational level, the world is full of highly educated, insincere, self centered assholes.

Not does character correlate with wealth, but that's another subject.

Conrad? I thought he'd been out of the running since the '50s. Is Joyce out of favour now as well?

quote:


How do you know how intelligent someone is by posts? They could be utilizing such a program... and be dumber than a box of rocks.

quote:

I'm almost positive that that is a browser add-on but, I could be wrong. I say this because I don't seem to have that underlining feature on my computer but, I have seen it on others.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
What browser do you use? I get the underline in Opera and Firefox but not IE. If you are using IE, perhaps someone else can suggest a plugin. If you are using the first two, let me know if I should check to see what plugins I have.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Epytropos
In my experience browser spellcheck features are dodgy at best. False positives unless you import a decent dictionary, lots of missed negatives. Better than nothing, but only marginally.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

It's very possible for someone to be intelligent and not a good writer but it is highly unlikely that a person who writes impeccably is riding the short bus.

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve
I have no idea, I can barely tolerate the company of lit majors these days, and presumably it is they who decide such things.

quote:

I'll give weight to why the error is there - is it a shortcut or lack of knowledge? For example, at work we IM a lot and often don't start with a capital letter or end with a period. It's a shortcut - we don't use it in our emails. Your skipped apostrophes don't bother me the way someone who improperly adds an apostrophe that indicates a possessive for an actual plural.

Too much abbreviation grates on me - I believe people should save "u" and "r" for texting.

quote:

On the surface this seems right, but you need only read Politics and Religion posts to realize the even the brightest, most erudite and enlightened people can devolve into insufferably dull boobs in no time at all. And one-track minds can have impeccable grammar.