fucktoyprincess
Posts: 2337
Status: offline
|
In response to the OP - I don't think the labels conservative, liberal, Democrat, Republican mean much these days. To understand what's someone's politics really are, you have to understand what policies they support. The short handed one-label system just doesn't really cut it. Just like in BDSM, my saying I'm submissive doesn't really give the full picture of who I am. And there are many things that people assume from the word (because of historic connotations, or simply because they want the word "submissive" to mean a particular something). And guess what, I have my own brand of "submission", defined, and refined by me based on my BDSM experiences, and no one can tell me otherwise. In the same way, while I might be a "liberal" in short-hand, to truly understand what that means to me would require actually talking to me about my political beliefs. The word serves as a short-hand in the most general of ways. The devil is always in the details. Part of the issue is that the political process is dominated by two very large parties, each of whom must necessarily house a wide spectrum of ideology under one banner. Quite difficult. So one really has to look past the labels, to individuals and what they speak to. And if one of the large parties does not have what you're looking for, find an independent who does. I've never been big on labels. And as the economy and social issues have become more complex, and our society more pluralistic, the simplicity of the old labels simply does not work. So call them whatever you want out of historic artifact - Elephants and Donkeys - and then move past that to understand the underlying policies of individual candidates. The world is no longer a cut and dry place (perhaps it never was, but it certainly is not now).
< Message edited by fucktoyprincess -- 1/24/2012 7:27:41 AM >
_____________________________
~ ftp
|