fucktoyprincess
Posts: 2337
Status: offline
|
I always play with a safeword in place. I am also into resistance play, so the typical objections (no, stop, etc.) don't work so well. So generally, with anyone I'm involved with, there has to be some agreed upon word that I can use and that the Dominant recognizes actually means "no", "stop", because in play, the real words no and stop don't mean what they would typically mean in a vanilla setting. I personally like having the safeword in place (although I have rarely ever had to use it). Generally I have only used it when a safety issue involved and it only stopped play temporarily as we made adjustments to bondage gear, etc. The safeword does allow a certain communication and avoids the need of any discussion around whether play should continue or not. As I have used my safeword so infrequently, I really don't think it affects how "real" play is. It's not as though people who play with safewords in place just invoke them constantly. That's not really the point. It's there for an emergency, or some situation that can't be anticipated, or some unusual situation, or simply for a situation where the submissive just really doesn't feel like continuing (tantamount to a revoking of consent) - and I feel it is there to protect both the submissive AND the Dominant. If I didn't enjoy resistance play, and no and stop could function in their typical meaning, I probably wouldn't need a special safeword in place. But then I would also have the expectation that the word no/stop would, in fact stop play, at least temporarily. Even with very trusted partners, I would not want to play without a way to stop play. I think the safe word issue is not just about how far a sadist can push a masochist. I enjoy S&M. I enjoy being pushed. But there are safety and consent issues that supersede even my desire for pain. I expect my Dominant to be aware of a lot when we play, but particularly when bondage is combined with S&M - I think it's a good idea for a safeword to be in place. But this is particular to me, my range of interests, and the potential risks that are involved. I can imagine many scenarios where a special safeword is not as necessary (if bondage and S&M are not a big part of one's play, then it is probably not as critical), but I would still say better to have a safeword in place that never has to be used, then to not have the safeword in place at all. Also, if I were a Dominant (which I very much am not) I would NEVER play without establishing a safeword. It's not that I don't trust myself. But if there are two people in a room, I think we both share responsibility around the issues of safety and consent, regardless of what the power exchange is.
_____________________________
~ ftp
|