quote:


Haven't heard that information myself but Iran often run trials for long range missiles that they hint could reach Dimona. It has led Israel to prepare to shut down their reactor there due to fallout risks.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:


Haven't heard that information myself but Iran often run trials for long range missiles that they hint could reach Dimona. It has led Israel to prepare to shut down their reactor there due to fallout risks.

Wow... that sucks (the shutdown)... could be a tipping point issue sometime soon (certainly can look like a posture)... What I heard< I think was something the jouirnalists picked out of a larger interview with someone in their government by a journalist of theirs I think.... normally I pay much better attention, but I've got this cold going strong tonight probably can't stay up for it's second airing or I'd offer to verify/clarify. I think I will be hitting the hay very soon though.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Well there ya go...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ayatollah-kill-all-jews-annihilate-israel/

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

The OP is from a far right site.

The KOOK SHOWN ON TV WAS FROM FUCKING OUTER SPACE.
I normally stay on the sidelines with regard to most middle east kookery... Know this,

You can only threaten groups of allies with total destruction so many times while making YELLOW CAKE before they fucking toast you.

Hey ... Here's a novel idea tell these people you hold so dear to MUZZEL the bad imitation of an arcade fortune teller, stop threatening countries and people US and the West in general consider friends, and show up at a negotiation with sincere intentions.

If every "deal" goes hand in hand with threats of destruction from political/spiritual leaders, the problem is NOT the people receiving the threat.

quote:

Take a tour of Hiroshima some day.

quote:

As Walter would say in the Big Lebowsky: "am I wrong"?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Well there ya go...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ayatollah-kill-all-jews-annihilate-israel/

Of course the usual subjects here will be blaming the Jews.

Sorry but could you point out who it is or how is it that Jewish people will be blamed......here?

I think you`re lying about that.

And why the CAPS.......trying to alarm folks, are you?

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

As Walter would say in the Big Lebowsky: "am I wrong"?

How does one say to some viet nam vet who never got all the way home, who has a .45 in his bowling bag, "Yes you are wrong you fucking moron.
If my analogy is not clear israel is the viet nam vet who never got all the way back home(read trauma from the holocaust) who has a nuclear weapon in his bowling bag and uses it to intimidate his neighbors.
Now we have some clown with more balls than brains telling walter he is not only wrong but also a fucking moron.
My guess is unless cooler heads prevail or he knows "mexican judo" iran could be in for a bumpy ride.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

As Walter would say in the Big Lebowsky: "am I wrong"?

How does one say to some viet nam vet who never got all the way home, who has a .45 in his bowling bag, "Yes you are wrong you fucking moron.
If my analogy is not clear israel is the viet nam vet who never got all the way back home(read trauma from the holocaust) who has a nuclear weapon in his bowling bag and uses it to intimidate his neighbors.
Now we have some clown with more balls than brains telling walter he is not only wrong but also a fucking moron.
My guess is unless cooler heads prevail or he knows "mexican judo" iran could be in for a bumpy ride.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

As Walter would say in the Big Lebowsky: "am I wrong"?

How does one say to some viet nam vet who never got all the way home, who has a .45 in his bowling bag, "Yes you are wrong you fucking moron.
If my analogy is not clear israel is the viet nam vet who never got all the way back home(read trauma from the holocaust) who has a nuclear weapon in his bowling bag and uses it to intimidate his neighbors.
Now we have some clown with more balls than brains telling walter he is not only wrong but also a fucking moron.
My guess is unless cooler heads prevail or he knows "mexican judo" iran could be in for a bumpy ride.

Not sure I would quite agree because Walter's (Israel's) neighbours are telling him that he is wrong all the time.

Had you chosen to watch the 60 minutes interview with amadinajad you would know why?


They don't even recognise Walter. Some won't even call him Walter. They told Walter to go fuck himself with the "three no's" in Khartoum in 1967.

The 60 minutes interview with amadinajad which you disagree with without having watched was nearly 40 years subsequent to khartoum. Who was in power in iran in 1967?


Walter has never threatened to use nuclear weapons against his neighbours since he supposedly obtained them circa 1965. I doubt Nuclear weapons really intimidated Israel's neighbours because Egypt, Jordan and Syria banked on Israel not having the balls to use its nuclear arsenal when they invaded in 1973 -

Who was in power in iran in 1973?

it was more Israel's conventional strength. The clown is doing the same, betting Walter won't ever have the balls to pull his gun...

Walter does not seem to have had any problem pulling his gun since about 1947 or so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

As Walter would say in the Big Lebowsky: "am I wrong"?

How does one say to some viet nam vet who never got all the way home, who has a .45 in his bowling bag, "Yes you are wrong you fucking moron.
If my analogy is not clear israel is the viet nam vet who never got all the way back home(read trauma from the holocaust) who has a nuclear weapon in his bowling bag and uses it to intimidate his neighbors.
Now we have some clown with more balls than brains telling walter he is not only wrong but also a fucking moron.
My guess is unless cooler heads prevail or he knows "mexican judo" iran could be in for a bumpy ride.

Not sure I would quite agree because Walter's (Israel's) neighbours are telling him that he is wrong all the time.

Had you chosen to watch the 60 minutes interview with amadinajad you would know why?

quote:


They don't even recognise Walter. Some won't even call him Walter. They told Walter to go fuck himself with the "three no's" in Khartoum in 1967.

The 60 minutes interview with amadinajad which you disagree with without having watched was nearly 40 years subsequent to khartoum. Who was in power in iran in 1967?

quote:

Walter has never threatened to use nuclear weapons against his neighbours since he supposedly obtained them circa 1965. I doubt Nuclear weapons really intimidated Israel's neighbours because Egypt, Jordan and Syria banked on Israel not having the balls to use its nuclear arsenal when they invaded in 1973 -

Who was in power in iran in 1973?

quote:


it was more Israel's conventional strength. The clown is doing the same, betting Walter won't ever have the balls to pull his gun...

Walter does not seem to have had any problem pulling his gun since about 1947 or so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

As Walter would say in the Big Lebowsky: "am I wrong"?

How does one say to some viet nam vet who never got all the way home, who has a .45 in his bowling bag, "Yes you are wrong you fucking moron.
If my analogy is not clear israel is the viet nam vet who never got all the way back home(read trauma from the holocaust) who has a nuclear weapon in his bowling bag and uses it to intimidate his neighbors.
Now we have some clown with more balls than brains telling walter he is not only wrong but also a fucking moron.
My guess is unless cooler heads prevail or he knows "mexican judo" iran could be in for a bumpy ride.

Not sure I would quite agree because Walter's (Israel's) neighbours are telling him that he is wrong all the time.

Had you chosen to watch the 60 minutes interview with amadinajad you would know why?

You suggested in the analogy that Israel's neighbours don't criticise it. That is clearly wrong. Not only do they criticise Israel, they incite against the nation and very often against the Jews generally. Ths is a very well known fact. Go and consult your oracle but let me just point out that Ammadinna saying otherwise won't actually make it so.

I cannot believe you are still going on about that fucking interview. I have told you many many times on the other thread that I would address any points you wish to make in relation to points that arsewipe makes in the interview. Make your points in relation to the video or shut up about it. You have no right whatsoever to demand of someone on a forum to spend an hour or whatever of their time watching a video before you even make a single point about it. I asked you repeatedly to address the other points I made in relation to ammadinna which you blithely ignored or dismissed out of hand. Yet you want me to look at material at length before you actually make your argument. How absurd.

quote:


They don't even recognise Walter. Some won't even call him Walter. They told Walter to go fuck himself with the "three no's" in Khartoum in 1967.

The 60 minutes interview with amadinajad which you disagree with without having watched was nearly 40 years subsequent to khartoum. Who was in power in iran in 1967?

The interview has nothing to do with the validity of my point, which is that Arab rejectionism is a central problem in the peace process despite Walter having a big fucking gun.

Who was in power in Iran in 1967? Look it up. It is completely irrelevant to the dabate. Israel had nothing to do with the nationalisation of British oil in Iran.

quote:

Walter has never threatened to use nuclear weapons against his neighbours since he supposedly obtained them circa 1965. I doubt Nuclear weapons really intimidated Israel's neighbours because Egypt, Jordan and Syria banked on Israel not having the balls to use its nuclear arsenal when they invaded in 1973 -

Who was in power in iran in 1973?

Again Google is your friend, and what does it matter anyway. If you are trying to make a point then just make it instead of wasting time with rhetorical questions.

quote:


it was more Israel's conventional strength. The clown is doing the same, betting Walter won't ever have the balls to pull his gun...

Walter does not seem to have had any problem pulling his gun since about 1947 or so.

You haven't followed your own metaphor. Israel didn't have the bomb (Walter's gun) back in 1947 even if it would have existed at that time. Eight countries declared war on Israel in 1948, within a day of its independence so what is your point? That they are awful warmongers more so than the Arabs? Then you should explain how they started the two major wars between the Arabs and Israel since 1947 - namely the 1967 Six Day war and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. No doubt you'll cite your Oracle Dr. Ammadinna on that too!

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
The interview addresses every point you have made. You know that and that is why you refuse to admit to watching the interview.

quote:


The questions about who was in power were rhetorical, but the you knew that.

quote:

I used to live there in 1967.
The only way you would know they bombed the place is peace park. Outside of peace park it looks like any other large japanese city.

quote:

Do you think it possible that some people look upon the u.s. in much the same manner as you are looking on iran?

quote:

If the u.s. did not have the ability to "toast" them do you think the protocol might be somewhat different?

quote:

I have not watched the interview but I don't really care if you believe me or not. You have displayed a contempt for the opinions of others on other threads.

You are entitled to your opinions no matter how ignorant,ill founded or poorly thought out they may be

Theirs are always mere opinions while you insist you only deal in "facts".


The fact is that the president of iran addressed all of your issues on the interview with 60 minutes, which you refuse to watch.
What do you have to say in response to his position as to why israel should not be where it is?


Yet you don't even have the decency to tell me what those facts are. I provided you with ample quotes and links to back up my perspective, which you dismissed out of hand.

I have not dismissed your opinion I have told you of an alternate point of view(which does dismiss your opinion) which you refuse to listen to.


All you do is cite one of perhaps hundreds of interviews Ammadinna did in the West


I would challange you to produce more than a few dozen interviews that he has done in the west?

as if everything he says in it is absolute truth.


I think you would have a pretty difficult time finding me saying he is telling the truth. I said he disagrees with the interpretation of what some people say he has said.
You on the other hand feel that what his enemies say he said is the truth because it coincides with what you believe about him...and you refuse to listen to what he himself says.
That pretty much makes any sort of discussion on this subjct pretty difficult.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

If the u.s. did not have the ability to "toast" them do you think the protocol might be somewhat different?

Yeah probably... And SO WHAT?

So is it your considered opinion that might makes right?