RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


GreedyTop -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 11:10:29 AM)

I'd rather blow ya. when ya coming south?

(and I say that with full intent of innuendo...)




tazzygirl -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 11:12:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

Sorry, Tazzy, but the link you posted specifically mentioned telling LIES about a poster.

Posting an opinion that someone is being captain/princess/whatever Obvious, IMO, does not fall into that restriction. (opinion = calling someone princess obvious, etc)


(sleepy..toddling off now...)


I can call someone a stupid ass who has no knowledge of a topic.. and I could be correct in that assessment.. and even prove it.. and still be moderated for doing so.




MasterCord -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 11:25:57 AM)

Conservative though my views may be, there are many, many ways to define heroism, fighting spirit and heroic acts. "Heroes" are meant to inspire others and Mrs. Gifford has certainly done that and acted as a role model - especially for veterans dealing with debilitating injuries.

I'm fine with the Navy's choice to name one of the new LCS after her.

Aylee, with all due respect, the LCS is an evolving design that will result in a fine ship for the mission intended. Both versions are far from being questionable in design and function beyond that which is true of any new class of vessel - naval or commercial. In the end their versatility will save money because they will be easily adaptable to multiple missions, eliminating the need for different classes of combatants to perform those differing missions. The Navy is working hard to accomplish that goal across the board in vessel design.

MC

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

I think Mrs Giffords is a valiant individual but I am perplexed at what she has done that was heroic. The Navy has chosen to name their Little Crappy Ship (LCS) after a victim. Mrs. Giffords's acts are not exactly on par with, say, the acts of Roger Young.

Is this is happening because nobody could vote against a ship named after such a personally popular figure? Even if the new class it belongs to is questionable in terms of performance and cost, and the act breaks with established convention in naming ships?

Or,and this is just me spit ballin here(I so like to spitball....lol)the Navy recognized her recovery for the heroic act that it is [:)]
Perhaps they noticed the dignity which she has carried herself every step of the way since that awful day as being worthy of having a ship named after her [:)]
Perhaps they recognized that her story is inspiring and hope to impart a sense of that inspiration to those who will serve on her [:)]
Again just me spit ballin [:)]





Hillwilliam -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 11:32:40 AM)

You can also say that someone is scientifically ignorant and it simply be a statement of fact and earn moderation.

Saying someone is ignorant is not an attack any more than saying I am short is an attack. It is simply a statement that the person lacks applicable knowledge the same way that the top of my balding head lacks altitude.




mnottertail -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 11:34:06 AM)

WTF?  You're short, Bonaparte?




Hillwilliam -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 12:19:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

WTF?  You're short, Bonaparte?

I am standing up. [8D]




SternSkipper -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 12:39:26 PM)

quote:

It does leave me confused though,will this ship be joining the same Navy that Romney ,Gingrich et al keep saying is being allowed to slip into second tier status ?


No Mike, it'll be joining the new Moon Navy!


[image]local://upfiles/18637/5537E9732DFB4B2C80358B91FA490402.jpg[/image]




mnottertail -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 12:39:35 PM)

5 foot 1 if by land and 5 foot 2 if by sea......

Nelson




tazzygirl -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 12:50:08 PM)

~FR

I want to publicly apologize to the Mods. My comments towards them on this thread was uncalled for. Their job is hard, and I certainly did not make it easier.

My sincere apology, Ladies/Gentlemen.




SternSkipper -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 1:01:56 PM)

quote:

Them da "rules" tho......ain`t them?


Most saw the wink and knew I was joking....


It's shocking what not being a living breathing conniption fit lets you glean from the posts of others




Aswad -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 5:51:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hussainishahid

The Russians are the only comparable power, and they have one aircraft carrier. 


However, they do have several submarines whose operating depth is twice that of the crush depth of the most resillient U.S. submarines. Throw in target painting torpedoes to guide missiles using thermobaric cluster warheads, and suddenly aircraft carriers are revealed to be what they have become: an expensive way to attack militarily weaker nations. Russia has no need for offensive power at the moment, beyond being able to neutralize any threats.

While certainly a nice gesture, it is neither unproblematic, nor without the potential to end up a very short lived one (seeing as the class of vessel in question may not have much of a future, which would make the gesture a less than ideal one).

Health,
al-Aswad.





stef -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/13/2012 10:29:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

However, they do have several submarines whose operating depth is twice that of the crush depth of the most resillient U.S. submarines.

Good grief, who do you think you're kidding? You have no idea what the operating parameters of active duty subs are. This isn't something you can look up in your handy copy of Jane's or on the intertubes.




Aswad -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/14/2012 1:56:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

Good grief, who do you think you're kidding? You have no idea what the operating parameters of active duty subs are. This isn't something you can look up in your handy copy of Jane's or on the intertubes.


Military analysts tend to have a pretty decent idea of the capabilities of active military technologies.

The titanium double hulls of the best Russian nuclear submarines can handle at least 1km operational depth, while the best guess as to the U.S. fleet places the operating depth of the deepest-going ones at about 400m max. As a rule, the crush depth margin is higher for titanium hulls, but either will have a margin of at least 2:1.

Health,
al-Aswad.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/14/2012 2:02:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

You can also say that someone is scientifically ignorant and it simply be a statement of fact and earn moderation.

Saying someone is ignorant is not an attack any more than saying I am short is an attack. It is simply a statement that the person lacks applicable knowledge the same way that the top of my balding head lacks altitude.


You just grew taller than your scalp, is all.



Peace and comfort,



Michael




thompsonx -> RE: Giffords honored by Navy,names ship after her (2/14/2012 3:56:38 PM)

quote:

Saying someone is ignorant is not an attack any more than saying I am short is an attack. It is simply a statement that the person lacks applicable knowledge the same way that the top of my balding head lacks altitude.


That your feet reach the ground makes you as tall as anyone in that direction. Altitude in the other direction is always optional.[;)]




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.222656E-02