Hillwilliam -> RE: Liz Trotta On Women Raped In Military: 'What Did They Expect?' (2/20/2012 10:45:25 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: xssve quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote:
ORIGINAL: xssve Look, males, biologically, are much more expendable than females, by simple virtue of the fact that a single male can impregnate multiple females - I don't like that fact one little bit, doesn't make it any less true. He could impregnate several but, in an archaic environment, he could not enjoy reproductive success because he would be unable to feed and defend them. 2, maybe. 3 or more, ain't happenin. They're leopard food. Be that as it may, optimal or no, the rule still holds. It's called r strategy, have enough offspring and it increases the chances that at least a percentage of them will survive. Thought you said you knew something about biology. And yes, Humans, like most mammals, are K strategists, although among mammals, MPI is seldom as common as it is among humans, although herd behaviors tend to compensate for that to a degree - one is probably more likely to find higher incidences MPI in avian species where the female has to stay in the nest and warm the egg and can't go out looking for food. But yes, it is also the reason that while rape is a strategy, it's usually a piss poor one, Genghis Khan notwithstanding. As for the archaic environment in which humans got their hardwired behaviors, they are more remote from Ghengis Khan than Khan was from the International Space Station. Your r strategy if fine for an animal like the codfish that has millions of eggs. It doesn't work with humans or others that have comparatively few offspring who are slow to mature. My claim is that the strategy is not just suboptimal. It is so poor as to be an evolutionary dead end. As for my biological knowlege, I taught it on a few university campuses. What's your claim to fame?
|
|
|
|