PeonForHer -> RE: Ok did I over react ? (2/20/2012 2:58:32 PM)
|
quote:
I've read his profile: what he said in his reply to this woman only reflects what was in that. Which time? Because his first reply was "I'm looking for long term" and the second reply was " Well, it doesn't have to be long term....". (Translation: Well, I'd take a piece of ass if I could get one.) I didn't read it that way at all. I thought what we had here was a man who didn't express what he felt with total clarity; but much more than that, a woman whose reading comprehension wasn't as sharp as it might have been. He didn't say that he was looking for 'long term', still less 'long term only'. What he said was: "most of what I want is in my profile but I will add that long term when I find the right submissive we will have all that a normal relationship has to offer love, trust, honest, and friendship but with a lovely kinky quirk running throw it." - To me, that says, "*If* - pronounced 'if' - we were to last as partners, over the long term, I'd want x and y in the relationship". 'X and Y' being good and honourable things. Not, at all, low and wankerish things. Put it this way, if the OP had spoken the same way to either of my sisters, about whom I'm very, very protective, I'd have thought, 'OK, not suave, rough around the edges, but nice enough guy. Decent. He'll pass'. The 'baby' would have rankled a bit but, then, I'm not a Dom. (You should read how some Dommes address sub males sometimes, and right from the get go. You'd either vomit or burst out laughing. Sometimes I've felt like replying, 'Thank you. Fine to call me 'Boy' - kind of horny, even - but don't assume I still wear nappies and like sucking lollipops, OK?".)
|
|
|
|