Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006 From: Dirty Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 Merc, The MM could be for universal health care access,saving the whales and taking religion out of public schools. Doesn`t change the fact that were formed by the KKK ,and have ties to the white supremacist groups,still today. I also want the boarder secured.The feds have basically let them in and have payed only lip service to the problem. We wouldn`t need the MM if businesses were confiscated or dissolved when found to be employing illegals.American business and the US Chamber Of Commerce,want what`s happening right now.They are making more money,and that`s all that matters for them.They don`t bear the cost of any of it,and reap all the benefit. Owner, Of all people I didn't think you'd argue on issues where we agree. The MM, Corporate scrutiny, and the CoC apparently are three such issues. I only point out (again!) that our elected representatives paid by PAC money paid, pay for the CoC 'catch & release' policy. Those payments aren't limited to the Executive officeholder. In fact it's Congress is where the big money is exchanged. But here's a question that may be more difficult. Would you support a national tamper-proof ID if that were a requirement for hiring or employment as a solution to corporations hiring criminal employees; and this ID could be enforced by ANY law enforcement entity? I don't know the answer to that myself - but I thought I'd ask. I don't need to review the founding or the CoC or of the MM to validate or invalidate them today. If you did that regarding the KKK you can rationalize that some aspects of the KKK had 'good intent' to combat the revenge motivated laws imposed on the south after the Civil War. I don't care what they did or if the Pope sanctioned their formation - I judge them based on today. Those payments aren't limited to the Executive officeholder. True,but the executive(Bush)runs things.The POTUS basically runs the entire federal government.Congress only has a check on the money.Bush issues executive orders like traffic tickets.If he wanted to do something about this,he could.This is a leadership problem. In fact it's Congress is where the big money is exchanged. But here's a question that may be more difficult. Would you support a national tamper-proof ID if that were a requirement for hiring or employment as a solution to corporations hiring criminal employees; and this ID could be enforced by ANY law enforcement entity? I don't know the answer to that myself - but I thought I'd ask. Yes.We have them,here in New Jersey.There would have to be some major protections for voters, who are otherwise shutout,ie.,the poor,and the obvious "big brother" issues would have to be addressed too.But if it was free and easy to get(if you are a US citizen),and your data/info wasn`t sold or used against you,...hell yeah.
< Message edited by Owner59 -- 1/14/2008 8:22:05 AM >
|