SoftBonds
Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: SoftBonds The second major reason has to do with the insurance people do have. Disclosure, I used to work in medical billing. Medical billing is one of the top growing jobs, and if you can do the work well, you can get a job anywhere, and get paid quite well (compared to other no-degree-required fields). Why is that? Well, Aetna (to pick an insurance company at random) pays out 81% of the money they collect as premiums to doctors and hospitals or otherwise for care. In other words, their administrative cost is 19% (compared to Medicare's rate of 2% of payments to medical providers). Now a part of that is sales, and clearly they take a profit, and there are a lot of paperwork fees, but a big portion of their costs is the claim denial department. These are the folks who either disagree with the doctor about what care is needed, or who deny a claim because the patient's middle name is spelled wrong. As a medical billing clerk, when this happens you shrug, note the reason the claim was denied, and work to fix it. Of course, they do anything they can to keep you from realizing what was wrong (e.g. wrong spelling of middle name=no patient in our records with that name), but you get a feel for the problem after a while. If it is a question about medical necesity, you chase down a doctor and get him to write a note on the chart so you can send that note to the insurance company-needless to say, that costs the doctor time, which costs the hospital money. In any case, there is a small army of medical billing clerks, often 1/doctor or provider, to deal with the insurance companies. Now ask yourself, does the extra administrative costs to the insurance companies plus the extra costs to the hospital for billing clerks come from thin air? Or does it come from the patients? I'd estimate that about $2500 of the extra $4000 per person the US spends on health care compared to Europe and Canada is from this cause, vs. about $1500 from the uninsured, but I haven't run the numbers... Why are doctors so expensive? I once heard (though I can't find any definitive evidence to prove or refute the allegation) that the rise of the insurance company has essentially created the rise in care costs. I'm not arguing on it's validity or invalidity, but if it is the cause, what would adding yet another insurance do to roll back costs? Absolutely nothing. If insurance companies are the cause, then perhaps there is something in there that we need to look at more. I'm not for or against insurance companies, to be honest. I understand their reason for being. Look at auto insurance. I have to have it, whether I need it or not. If I never get into an accident, what has my premiums gotten me, other than poorer? Pretty much nothing. What happened prior to the rise of the insurance company? I thought I answered the question... Basically, Doctors are paying for a lot of medical billing clerks to fight petty battles against health insurance companies to get paid for their services. Meanwhile, the insurance companies have to pay for the folks that deny claims. That is a lot of people being paid to fight over whether or not you really needed that appendectomy... So yes, the insurance companies have significantly increased the cost of care. Now granted, they have also increased the costs by allowing people who are not wealthy to get $50,000+ medical procedures like transplants, but I don't see that as so horrible. That sort of stuff is paid for by the NHS and Canadian system... They may have also increased costs by increasing the complexity of billing. Health Insurance companies negotiate lower rates for their patients (or at least, state a max they will pay towards a procedure) and doctors have to work within those prices. Often, costs are sqeezed like a balloon... Sometimes, the poorest are the ones hurt by this, since they are the only ones with no one negotiating on their behalf. Other times, it is the doctors that "absorb," the effects. This is why Doctors keep warning us that if the medicare payment for services cuts ever go through they will stop seeing medicare patients... There is also, as has been alluded to, a supply and demand problem. Certainly a federal program to turn out more doctors, preferrably while decreasing student indebtedness for doctors, would lower costs... But more nurses would help both costs and patients more...
_____________________________
Elite Thread Hijacker! Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply) The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.
|