AislynLass
Posts: 56
Joined: 7/5/2009 Status: offline
|
I'm extremely surprised also at some of the responses from posters who I generally respected. While everyone's meaning of what it means to be a Master and/or a Dominant varies according to the individual, the one common denominator seemed to be the aspect of the Master and Dominant being the one in control. Control carries with it responsibility, and I frankly do not understand how a person calling themselves a Master or a Dominant would wish that the person who gave up working in order to better please the Master or Dominant would feel justified in so neatly washing their hands of responsibility towards that person as soon as the relationship ended. This is considering a relationship where it did not end because the slave or submissive violated some basic tenet of trust or unethical or violent behavior towards the Master or Dominant. If I were a Master or Dominant, I do not see how I would feel okay that my slave or submissive who gave up or put on hold their career to please me and make themselves more available for my wishes, should then find themselves in a worse situation when the relationship ends that when it began. For the sake of the discussion, I am focusing on the financial aspect. For lack of a better way of phrasing it, I would not wish to see them in a disadvantaged or less position as a result of the time they spent in the relationship with me. I don't think anyone is arguing that the Master or Dominant should be responsible for the slave or submissive for the rest of their lives after the breakup, but there seems a terrible lack of parity in the situation where the Master or Dominant has enjoyed the benefits of the relationship and is essentially not the worse for it at the end, while the slave or submissive who has contributed their time and efforts in the relationship should bear the worse....especially when the Master or Dominant is making the decision to end the relationship. I hope I've been able to clearly express my point. Relationships don't work out and people break up all the time for a myriad of reasons, and M/s and D/s relationships are no different in that. However, I just believe that due to the Master and the Dominant choosing to hold the position of control in that relationship, that connotes some measure of responsibility towards the slave or submissive to "see them right" at the end so that they don't find themselves in a worse-off position financially, professionally, etc. at the end of the relationship than they were in the beginning. Again, this doesn't have to mean some cash payout or whatever at the end, but the Master or Dominant acting in their slave's or submissive's best interest. Depending on the couple, it could mean ensuring that the slave's or submissive's skills might be kept current through classes for instance. I agree very much with the comments that have been made that it is very important to have clear discussions of the "what-if", especially if the level of commitment that a Master or Dominant may require in a TPE 24/7 relationship necessitates the slave or submissive stepping back from their career or education to be 24/7 at home for instance. And yes, I know that not all Masters or Dominants, and not all TPE 24/7 relationships require that. My response here with this discussion is really directed to those that are of that type.
< Message edited by AislynLass -- 3/3/2012 12:21:55 PM >
_____________________________
Aislyn Life is short. bend the rules, forgive quicky, kiss slowly, love truly, laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile.
|