Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 8:55:42 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Poverty is not going to ever go away (when in human history has poverty not existed?).


There are societies in which poverty does not exist.
The mbuti of central africa have not known poverty in the 6000 years of their recorded existance. Poverty will exist in any society that allows one group to control the means of production.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 3/8/2012 8:56:09 AM >

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 9:01:23 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Poverty is not going to ever go away (when in human history has poverty not existed?).


There are societies in which poverty does not exist.
The mbuti of central africa have not known poverty in the 6000 years of their recorded existance. Poverty will exist in any society that allows one group to control the means of production.


You could claim that but, in my mind, a people that has no electricity, or indoor plumbing and always has the specter of disease, starvation and the various hazards of near stone age life is in poverty.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 9:51:51 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Poverty is not going to ever go away (when in human history has poverty not existed?).


There are societies in which poverty does not exist.
The mbuti of central africa have not known poverty in the 6000 years of their recorded existance. Poverty will exist in any society that allows one group to control the means of production.


You could claim that but, in my mind, a people that has no electricity,

They do not have cable so why do they need electricity?


or indoor plumbing

Since they are nomadic hunter gatherers they have no need for indoor plumbing. Remember these people have been living in the same space for 6000 years that we have records for and have not fouled their environment. Conversly here in the states we have rivers that catch on fire.


and always has the specter of disease, starvation and the various hazards of near stone age life is in poverty.

These folks are pre stone age. They use pointed sticks to kill elephants with no stone points.
Once they reach puberty their life span is similar to the u.s....oth the mortality rate for those who have not reached purberty is about 50%(tough learning curve)They do not have unplaned pregnancies,they do not have words for murder,rape or war.
They eat a well ballanced diet,they do not suffer from endemic disease.
Oddly enough as hunter gatherers the women and women only grow one crop....marijuana. More than one anthropologist that has studdied them has commented on the honey that is produced by wild bees from all the marijuana that grows there. I believe it was turnbull who labeled it "nectar of the gods" Their hazards are external (outside forces not the environment)not internal. They(some not all or even most) also shift back and forth from forrest life to more modern technology seemlessly. The most effective poacher in cental africa is an mbuti with a 416 rigby.



(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 11:50:41 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Conversly here in the states we have rivers that catch on fire.

I thought the EPA had stopped that around the turn of the '80s?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 12:13:16 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Conversly here in the states we have rivers that catch on fire.

I thought the EPA had stopped that around the turn of the '80s?


Havent you heard that the epa is one of those scams foisted on the people by the socialst.
That it is nothing more than an anti bussiness set of regulations designed to strangle capitalism?

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 12:17:28 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Oh, no question, but I thought it was a long while since the Cuyahuga actually caught fire...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 12:26:06 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Oh, no question, but I thought it was a long while since the Cuyahuga actually caught fire...


The cuyahuga has caught fire more than a dozen times. The last time was in the late 60's. But if the fucking epa would butt out we could once again go sailing by firelight

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 12:26:34 PM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

I don't see how that is any more of a negative comparison than a plethora of other statements that make comparisons to animals when making a point.

"Don't bite the hand that feeds you"
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink."

Off the top of my head.

Poorly worded maybe, but that's a major over-reaction over nothing.


You,like she, see only what you choose to see.
That is why you are both wrong.




Or you're wrong about what I "choose to see."

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 12:30:17 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

I don't see how that is any more of a negative comparison than a plethora of other statements that make comparisons to animals when making a point.

"Don't bite the hand that feeds you"
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink."

Off the top of my head.

Poorly worded maybe, but that's a major over-reaction over nothing.


You,like she, see only what you choose to see.
That is why you are both wrong.




Or you're wrong about what I "choose to see."




I cannot be wrong about what you choose to see because you have posted what you choose to see.
What you posted is what I commented on.
Take your word game and go sit down.
When you wish to have a serious discussion please come back.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 1:14:44 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Poverty is not going to ever go away (when in human history has poverty not existed?).


There are societies in which poverty does not exist.
The mbuti of central africa have not known poverty in the 6000 years of their recorded existance. Poverty will exist in any society that allows one group to control the means of production.



The Mbuti are a nomadic pygmy tribe in the Congo. I would define the overall geo-political unit there as the Congo, and not simply the forest where the Mbuti thrive. I would liken the Mbuti to a society like the Amish - i.e., a self-sufficient society within a broader political unit. But the existence of the Amish in the U.S. does not mean poverty does not exist in the U.S. And the Amish exist only because the U.S. protects their right to their religion and their way of life. So they are highly dependent on those policies for their very existence.

The Mbuti also face other challenges from other people in the Congo. Challenges that cannot be met without appropriate policies and protections in place. And certainly extreme poverty exists in other parts of the Congo. I would not cite the Mbuti as evidence that the Congo has eradicated poverty.

I attach the following which to me presents a slightly different perspective on the Mbuti. It seems to me that they still require policies to protect them. Again, without policy designed to prevent poverty, poverty, and its associated ills like female exploitation, disease, etc. does often result. It is very difficult in today's world for people to live completely independently unless they have some protections in place (like the Amish in the U.S.)

The following is from Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pygmy_peoples

Systematic discrimination
Raja James Sheshardi of the American University conducted a case study on the Pygmies of Africa and concluded that deforestation has greatly affected their everyday lives. Pygmy culture is threatened today by the forces of political and economic change. In recent times, this has manifested itself into an open conflict over the resources of the tropical rain-forest, it is a conflict that the Pygmy are losing.
Historically, the Pygmy have always been viewed as inferior by both colonial authorities and the village dwelling Bantu tribes.[28] This has translated into systematic discrimination. One early example was the capture of Pygmy children under the auspices of the Belgian colonial authorities, who exported Pygmy children to zoos throughout Europe, including the world's fair in the United States in 1907.[28] Pygmies are often evicted from their land and given the lowest paying jobs. At a state level, Pygmies are not considered citizens by most African states and are refused identity cards, deeds to land, health care and proper schooling. Government policies and multinational corporations involved in massive deforestation have exacerbated this problem by forcing more Pygmies out of their traditional homelands and into villages and cities where they often are marginalized, impoverished and abused by the dominant culture.
Today there are roughly 500,000 Pygmies left in the rain-forest of Central Africa.[28] This population is rapidly decreasing as poverty, intermarriage with Bantu peoples, Westernization, and deforestation all gradually destroy their way of life and culture along with their genetic uniqueness.
The greatest environmental problem the Pygmies seem to be facing is the loss of their traditional homeland, the tropical forests of Central Africa. In several countries such as Cameroon, Gabon, Central African Republic and the Republic of Congo this is due to deforestation and the desire of several governments in Central Africa to evict the Pygmies from their forest habitat in order to cash in on quick profits from the sale of hardwood and the resettlement of farmers onto the cleared land. In some cases, as in Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, this conflict is violent. Certain groups, such as the Hutus of the Interahamwe, wish to eliminate the Pygmy and take the resources of the forest as a military conquest, using the resources of the forest for military as well as economic advancement.[28] Since the Pygmies rely on the forest for their physical as well as cultural survival, as these forests disappear, so do the Pygmy.
Along with Raja Sheshardi, the fPcN-Global.org website had conducted research on the pygmies. The human rights organization states that as the forest has receded under logging activities, its original inhabitants have been pushed into populated areas to join the formal economy, working as casual laborers or on commercial farms and being exposed to new diseases.[29] This shift has brought them into closer contact with neighboring ethnic communities whose HIV levels are generally higher. This has led to the spread of HIV/AIDS into the pygmy group.
Since poverty has become very prevalent in the Pygmy communities, sexual exploitation of indigenous women has become a common practice. Commercial sex has been bolstered by logging, which often places large groups of male laborers in camps which are set up in close contact with the Pygmy communities.
Human rights groups have also reported widespread sexual abuse of indigenous women in the conflict-ridden eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Despite these risks, Pygmy populations generally have poor access to health services and information about HIV. The British medical journal, The Lancet, published a review showing that Pygmy populations often had worse access to health care than neighboring communities.[30] According to the report, even where health care facilities exist, many people do not use them because they cannot pay for consultations and medicines, they do not have the documents and identity cards needed to travel or obtain hospital treatment, and they are subjected to humiliating and discriminatory treatment.[29]
Studies in Cameroon and ROC in the 1980s and 1990s showed a lower prevalence of HIV in pygmy populations than among neighboring ones, but recent increases have been recorded. One study found that the HIV prevalence among the Baka pygmies in eastern Cameroon went from 0.7 percent in 1993 to 4 percent in 2003.[29]

p.s. I stand by my statement that poverty is not going to ever go away and that how a society chooses to redistribute wealth will start to matter a lot. We can be enlightened about our approach or stick our heads in the sand. Without policies in place to prevent expatiation, without policies in place to redistribute, you will always have people who are marginalized.

< Message edited by fucktoyprincess -- 3/8/2012 1:19:49 PM >


_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 1:54:00 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
aus
quote:

The Mbuti are a nomadic pygmy tribe in the Congo. I would define the overall geo-political unit there as the Congo, and not simply the forest where the Mbuti thrive.

Then you would be wrong.

I would liken the Mbuti to a society like the Amish

Then once again you would be wrong.
The amish are taxpayers and citizens of the u.s.
Your wiki cite points out that the mbuti (pygmy is name given to them by white people)do not share the same position as the rest of the citizens of the congo.



- i.e., a self-sufficient society within a broader political unit. But the existence of the Amish in the U.S. does not mean poverty does not exist in the U.S. And the Amish exist only because the U.S. protects their right to their religion and their way of life. So they are highly dependent on those policies for their very existence.

The mbuti were there first and the europeans came later. Here in the u.s. we managed to murder most of the indigenous people. The ones that are left are on what the defense department still classifies as pow camps.
Not in the same ball park ....not in the same zip code.


The Mbuti also face other challenges from other people in the Congo. Challenges that cannot be met without appropriate policies and protections in place.

You mean like leaving tem alone and not fucking with them?

And certainly extreme poverty exists in other parts of the Congo. I would not cite the Mbuti as evidence that the Congo has eradicated poverty.

I am speaking of only the mbuti. You are the one who wants to bring in the congo.

I attach the following which to me presents a slightly different perspective on the Mbuti.

Colin turnbull should be your primary source on things mbuti. Seccond would be those who have critiqued his primary work.

It seems to me that they still require policies to protect them. Again, without policy designed to prevent poverty, poverty, and its associated ills like female exploitation, disease, etc. does often result. It is very difficult in today's world for people to live completely independently unless they have some protections in place (like the Amish in the U.S.)

It seems that the mbuti did fairly well for themselves before the capitalist came and started stealing their forest.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 3/8/2012 2:32:18 PM >

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 2:22:28 PM   
Anaxagoras


Posts: 3086
Joined: 5/9/2009
From: Eire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
These folks are pre stone age. They use pointed sticks to kill elephants with no stone points.
Once they reach puberty their life span is similar to the u.s....oth the mortality rate for those who have not reached purberty is about 50%(tough learning curve)They do not have unplaned pregnancies,they do not have words for murder,rape or war.


There are no human beings that exist in conditions that could be considered pre-Stone Age. Furthermore the growing of crops is a relatively advanced technology that only developed in the New Stone Age some ten to six thousand years ago. The pygmys appear to exist in conditions that are somewhere between middle and new stone age.

_____________________________

"That woman, as nature has created her, and man at present is educating her, is man's enemy. She can only be his slave or his despot, but never his companion." (Venus in Furs)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 2:47:42 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
These folks are pre stone age. They use pointed sticks to kill elephants with no stone points.
Once they reach puberty their life span is similar to the u.s....oth the mortality rate for those who have not reached purberty is about 50%(tough learning curve)They do not have unplaned pregnancies,they do not have words for murder,rape or war.


There are no human beings that exist in conditions that could be considered pre-Stone Age.

Are you speaking ex cathedra?
Have you been to every gathering of people on the whole planet?
Perhaps you might want to read up on this before you plant both feet firmly in your mouth.
Look up colin turnbull. He was the anthropologist who did all of the seminal work on the mbuti culture.
These people neither make nor use stone tools.
When they hunt they use nets and sharp sticks.


Furthermore the growing of crops is a relatively advanced technology that only developed in the New Stone Age some ten to six thousand years ago.

Please pay attention. The mbuti are not farmers they do not raise crops they are hunter gatherers.

The pygmys appear to exist in conditions that are somewhere between middle and new stone age.

Only to those without the ability to research their topic before posting.


(in reply to Anaxagoras)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 2:57:03 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
The Mbuti have been subjugated and persecuted and marginalized in various ways for 100s of years. At this point, the success of their society in pre-colonial times is really a LONG time ago. The conditions of their current existence is not palatable even to themselves.

So what is your point exactly?

That we do NOT have to worry about poverty?? That people who are poor should live like the Mbuti?? That if there is poverty in our society that we don't have to deal with it?? That poverty can be eradicated if we ALL live like the Mbuti (even though we are a heterogeneous pluralistic society)???

My point is that as a society we do have to consider policies that will adequately address the issues of poverty. Poor people in the world are not going to just disappear. There is no solution long term to the global poverty that exists without redistribution.

If you feel otherwise, and are using the Mbuti as an example, please elaborate, because your thesis is entirely unclear. Not being difficult here, but I am really trying hard to understand the relevance of a society of people that is currently living in an endangered situation and who cannot be helped without political intervention of some sort.

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 4:02:12 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

The Mbuti have been subjugated

Not to my knowledge. If you have some data showing that they are taxpaying citizens of congo I would like to see it.

and persecuted and marginalized in various ways for 100s of years.

I am unconvinced that the europeans had much impact on the mbuti in 1812 which would have been just 200 years ago. Colin turnbull would be my source on that.

At this point, the success of their society in pre-colonial times is really a LONG time ago.


Colin turnbull was there in the 1960's I believe and his books contradict your opinion.

The conditions of their current existence is not palatable even to themselves.

With this I am in full agreement. It is unpalatable because of outsiders both european and african are fucking with them.

So what is your point exactly?

You said poverty exists everywhere in all societies...I pointed to one that had existed for 6000 years.
You are quite right to point out that they are now on the edge of extinction. Not as biological units but as a culture. The iterie forrest will be cut down to make pallets and ping pong paddles and the mbuti will be assimilated into other cultures.
It kinda sux to see a culture that existed unchanged longer than any on the planet being 86'd to make way for vulture capitalist.


That we do NOT have to worry about poverty??
Nope not my point at all

That people who are poor should live like the Mbuti??

Nope not my point at all

That if there is poverty in our society that we don't have to deal with it??


Nope not my point at all

That poverty can be eradicated if we ALL live like the Mbuti (even though we are a heterogeneous pluralistic society)???

Nope not my point at all

My point is that as a society we do have to consider policies that will adequately address the issues of poverty. Poor people in the world are not going to just disappear. There is no solution long term to the global poverty that exists without redistribution.


Here you are preaching to the choir

If you feel otherwise, and are using the Mbuti as an example, please elaborate, because your thesis is entirely unclear.

I was simply pointing out that there exist a society more than 6000 years old that has no poverty.
Now that society is being dismanteled to make rich people richer and no other reason.


Not being difficult here, but I am really trying hard to understand the relevance of a society of people that is currently living in an endangered situation and who cannot be helped without political intervention of some sort.

The only intervention those folks need is to be left the fuck alone. Stop pushing roads through their forrest. Stop shooting them for target practice.


(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 4:20:13 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

The only intervention those folks need is to be left the fuck alone. Stop pushing roads through their forrest. Stop shooting them for target practice.


This can only happen with political intervention. Again, to the extent that they are in the geo-political unit known the Congo, some political action must be taken. I'm not trying to argue with you. I just don't see how you can save them from poverty, marginalization, or annihilation without some form of political intervention.

If your reaction is due to my (possible) hyperbole of "poverty has always existed", fine. So we have ONE example that is contrary (although I would actually disagree with you, but fine I'll grant you that). How does this inform us of how to proceed going forward?

My point, to be more accurate, is that GOING FORWARD, global poverty is a fact. And in many parts of the world it has been a fact for a very long time. And it is not going anywhere. And it is not solvable through any means having to do with the out-dated notions of self-sufficiency and "fending for oneself" as was suggested by Franson in her quote. In our heterogeneous, pluralistic global economy that is becoming increasingly polarized economically (with wealth concentrated in the hands of the few and a larger number of poor) and where the economic structure of the future is necessarily going to mean fewer jobs, we are, as a society, going to have to grapple with the very issues that Franson suggests are unnecessary. It is HER that I disagree with.

If you would like to start a thread on the Mbuti specifically and discuss their plight, maybe you should do that. But a discussion about the Mbuti is not helping inform anyone here about whether food stamps create dependency and whether, as a society, we owe any duty to the poor.

I do NOT believe, going forward, that global poverty can be eradicated by relying solely on the notion of individual self-sufficiency, i.e., leaving people to fend for themselves. People like Franson are seriously misguided. And if they continue in the vein that they want, I think the analogies of Louis XVI and Czar Nicholas are really not far off the mark. A society with an entrenched poor that grows and does not have a safety net, will eventually rise up. Anyone who wants a stable society ought to be in support of policies that help the poor.

It is possible that what the Mbuti need is to be left alone. I'm not sure that for the rest of the world's poor that leaving them alone is the answer.


_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 4:22:49 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Poverty is not going to ever go away (when in human history has poverty not existed?).


There are societies in which poverty does not exist.
The mbuti of central africa have not known poverty in the 6000 years of their recorded existance. Poverty will exist in any society that allows one group to control the means of production.


You could claim that but, in my mind, a people that has no electricity,

They do not have cable so why do they need electricity?


or indoor plumbing

Since they are nomadic hunter gatherers they have no need for indoor plumbing. Remember these people have been living in the same space for 6000 years that we have records for and have not fouled their environment. Conversly here in the states we have rivers that catch on fire.


and always has the specter of disease, starvation and the various hazards of near stone age life is in poverty.

These folks are pre stone age. They use pointed sticks to kill elephants with no stone points.
Once they reach puberty their life span is similar to the u.s....oth the mortality rate for those who have not reached purberty is about 50%(tough learning curve)They do not have unplaned pregnancies,they do not have words for murder,rape or war.
They eat a well ballanced diet,they do not suffer from endemic disease.
Oddly enough as hunter gatherers the women and women only grow one crop....marijuana. More than one anthropologist that has studdied them has commented on the honey that is produced by wild bees from all the marijuana that grows there. I believe it was turnbull who labeled it "nectar of the gods" Their hazards are external (outside forces not the environment)not internal. They(some not all or even most) also shift back and forth from forrest life to more modern technology seemlessly. The most effective poacher in cental africa is an mbuti with a 416 rigby.




Your opinion that a culture that exists in the stone age doesn't live in what would be called "poverty" is just that. an opinion.

I totally agree that we need to just stay the hell away and let them live their lives. I doubt it will actually happen.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 4:42:35 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

The only intervention those folks need is to be left the fuck alone. Stop pushing roads through their forrest. Stop shooting them for target practice.


This can only happen with political intervention. Again, to the extent that they are in the geo-political unit known the Congo, some political action must be taken. I'm not trying to argue with you. I just don't see how you can save them from poverty, marginalization, or annihilation without some form of political intervention.


You and I both know that that is not going to happen.

If your reaction is due to my (possible) hyperbole of "poverty has always existed", fine. So we have ONE example that is contrary (although I would actually disagree with you, but fine I'll grant you that). How does this inform us of how to proceed going forward?

Perhaps being informed about how they managed to do what they did for so long might be helpful in making the earth a better place for all of us.

My point, to be more accurate, is that GOING FORWARD, global poverty is a fact. And in many parts of the world it has been a fact for a very long time. And it is not going anywhere. And it is not solvable through any means having to do with the out-dated notions of self-sufficiency and "fending for oneself" as was suggested by Franson in her quote. In our heterogeneous, pluralistic global economy that is becoming increasingly polarized economically (with wealth concentrated in the hands of the few and a larger number of poor) and where the economic structure of the future is necessarily going to mean fewer jobs, we are, as a society, going to have to grapple with the very issues that Franson suggests are unnecessary. It is HER that I disagree with.

If you would like to start a thread on the Mbuti specifically and discuss their plight, maybe you should do that.

Why?
I was simply making a point that we do not live in a world of absolutes. If one group found a way to be successful for so long there is the possibility that others could also.


But a discussion about the Mbuti is not helping inform anyone here about whether food stamps create dependency and whether, as a society, we owe any duty to the poor.

I have explained why I choose the mbuti as an example. Please do not try to make more of than it is.

I do NOT believe, going forward, that global poverty can be eradicated by relying solely on the notion of individual self-sufficiency, i.e., leaving people to fend for themselves. People like Franson are seriously misguided. And if they continue in the vein that they want, I think the analogies of Louis XVI and Czar Nicholas are really not far off the mark. A society with an entrenched poor that grows and does not have a safety net, will eventually rise up. Anyone who wants a stable society ought to be in support of policies that help the poor.

That is why they have an army and cops. What is their incentive to do otheerwise?

It is possible that what the Mbuti need is to be left alone. I'm not sure that for the rest of the world's poor that leaving them alone is the answer.

I have not suggested such have I?



(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 4:50:02 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Your opinion that a culture that exists in the stone age doesn't live in what would be called "poverty" is just that. an opinion.

Let me see if I understand you clearly.
I work one or two days a week.
I smoke marijuana all day.
I get laid when ever I like
I have more food than I can eat.
My bed is as soft as yours.
I don't worry about the cost of gasoline,cable,internet acess, or my next door neighbor stealing any of my stuff.
Heart desease and hypertension are unknown to me.
I live in the middle of a primevil forrest that feeds me and houses me.
Please tell me what this person lacks that makes them poverty striken?


I totally agree that we need to just stay the hell away and let them live their lives. I doubt it will actually happen

You are correct.
Unless I step in front of a truck or something their society will be gone in my lifetime. Too fucking sad.


(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? - 3/8/2012 4:58:00 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

Minnesota legislator Mary Franson issued a video message that included the following "funny little clip" from a friend:

quote:

Isn't it ironic that the food stamp program, part of the Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of food stamps ever.

Meanwhile, the Park Service, also part of the Department of Agriculture, asks us to please not feed the animals, because the animals may grow dependent and not learn to take care of themselves.


Source: Daily Kos

Really, what are they putting in midwestern water these days?

Any guesses as to her party affiliation?



The law dictionary?



Human Being: 'See monster' .
Monster: 'A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal.'

Ballentine's Law Dictionary 1948.


Maybe they know something you all dont? LMAO







_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Food Stamp Recipients = Animals? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094