Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 10:54:04 AM   
SpiritedRadiance


Posts: 1341
Joined: 3/3/2010
Status: offline
I do not think topping from the bottom exists... (I prefer Male Dom fem sub relationships so a disclaimer its written from Md/fs but applies to FD/ms as well.)

First off I come from a background of being a "difficult" (read very selective) submissive. Ive had this term used towards me in many many many situations by many dominants submissives and slaves.It has always been in a negative way. It has been for many reasons such as: I refused to submit to a punishment,( i do not engage in punishment dynamics and this was known prior to the relationship forming) Because i sneezed while serving dinner, I broke a dish while putting away the plates, I told a dominant no i wouldnt violate a hard limit of mine. I told a top, i knew in the scene to get his own water. I asked more then once to do something i personally felt was really important. I used my safeword. I took a nap after being up for 36 hours. I went to the hospital after a scene because i couldnt feel my hands.

All of the times its been applied to me or to those i know, its only been applied because the person in question didnt know how to handle me as a submissive, was not in a position of authority over me, or did not have the level of authority necessary over me to get what he asked for.

If the dominant who asked me to get him a drink, (hes not my owner, nor at the time was he someone i played with or knew more then casually) Had said please, id have gotten him the drink (we did not have any sort of power exchange)

I have only heard this term as a negative to a submissive who wasnt behaving as the dominant wanted. Usually in a situation where the dominant in question had not earned the trust of the submissive or had the right of control. I see it as emotional blackmail. Most submissives wish to please, they wish to make their partner happy. When told then are topping from the bottom, they freeze the wonder what theyve done, theyve displeased their partner and they take a giant leap back. Topping from the bottom usually means, you wouldnt give control to a dominant that hasnt earned it, you question their ability to be a top, you question their knowledge. You ask a lot of questions and it makes the dominant nervous. I was topping from the bottom when i asked my then partner, if he tied the knot right, because my hand was completely numb.

They make you feel like your in the wrong, because you do something silly like question your safety. They make you feel like your terrible because you did something they didnt want. They always make it the submissives fault, because something happened that didnt go according to plan.

In Chattes Example with the dogs, i wouldnt see bringing home the puppy as topping from the bottom. Why? The control is still in the dominants hands to make the decision, if he says yes. Hes saying yes, within his power hes agreeing, if he says no it means with in his power hes disagreeing.

If he says yes and you now somehow see him as weak, you must honestly think, why do i see him as weak? Hes in control, just because he made a decision in my favor, doesnt mean hes no longer in control. It means in that instance he did something to me in my favor. Im not going to question him saying yes to something that he said no about previously, just like im not going to question him saying yes. Pet you may cum until you pass out. Im going to accept he said yes for a reason and move on with my life.


Topping from the bottom, can only exist if the dominant isnt in control. Regardless of wither i pout, sulk, whimper, whine, throat a fit, say no, do the hokey pokey, the chicken dance, drink wine, walk around with socks on my hands, dust with his favorite jacket before his big interview, nap when im supposed to be at work or whatever. If the dominants in control in our relationship, he can say Kitten, You know how i feel when you act like your three, knock it off.. He and only he allows wither or not my tactics and actions are going to make him change or effect his decision.. He and only he is in control in the relationship. If he is no longer in control, there can be no topping from the bottom, because there is no top, there is no one in control, there for with out the control there is no bottom to take said control.

He might see how strongly i feel on something and take a step back and reevaluate his answer. Does this make him weak? No, this makes him someone who might have misjudged the importance of something. It makes him someone who values the communication his submissive offers even if it wasnt done effectively. Some times when emotions are high, or theres disappointment, i might not communicate effectively. I might be a down right unpleasant cunt. Is he going to hold this against me? No im a human being, its natural to be disappointed when you get your hopes up. Does he let me know the way i was communicating was not appropriate? Yes he usually does. Does he discount everything I said when i was communicating ineffectively? No he listens, then when we are both calm he asks again to make sure he got it all right. He might see how i react to something, and say Sucks to be you, pout whimper whine beg cry all you want my answer stands...

In all of the situations regardless of what I do, wither i react poorly or not... its still in his power and his control and its his decision what he does... Might he out of pure frustration, say yes to something he would prefer to say no to because i am worse then a dog worrying a bone on some things. Yes. Is this topping from the bottom? No. Because He and HE alone is responsible for being the one in control in the relationship. Even if he says yes when he is indifferent or would prefer no. HE IS allowing the behavior and therefor is being in control. Some things in my life i will not accept no as an answer for. If it has anything to do with my family, I will pester the ever loving shit out of someone until they agree. Topping from the bottom? Nope, Still that person choice to say yes or no. While saying yes makes their life a lot more pleasant... They can choose to say no.

You also have to ask yourself, when does topping from the bottom come into question? I usually see it with newer submissives, who doesnt know the ropes, and doesnt know how to communicate their wants and needs in an effective manner. And i see mostly weak dominants, who live in the worlds its my way or no way adapt, use these phrases.

Its always negative, and its always negative to the submissive's behavior only, its meant to guilt, demean, and other wise put the submissive down.

Its why i call topping from the bottom, bottoming from the top, Its why i call punishment the dominants failure more then the submissives. Because its Two people and if one persons in control hes responsible for that control and if he allows or does something that he doesnt want to or would prefer not to do.. its ONLY HIM that is to blame, because HE allowed it.

_____________________________

"Theres nothing in life like the feeling of cool leather sliding over your skin, the tears that fill your eyes as you realize someone else thinks you deserve it even if you havent reached that conclusion yet"- Forever to remember 11/5/11

(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 10:54:21 AM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
I think that manipulative behavior exists. I personally don't feel the need to label it with a special label just because it's a sub doing it to a dom but if you do that's fine. In that vein topping from the bottom exists.

I think importantly to me though, since this behavior is always ascribed to the sub, is the fact that in order for this manipulation to actually go anywhere the dom has to allow himself to be manipulated. It takes two to tango so in order for "topping from the bottom" to happen then "bottoming from the top" must also. I think I reflexively argue against it because the presentation is always so lopsided... it's the sub's fault. So I tend to point out that the dom also has some sort of responsibility not to abdicate his or her authority and deciding to be manipulated is absolutely abdication.

Also, and on an entirely personal note, this is another of those phrases that just wouldn't fit Carol and I. It implies an underlying viewpoint that neither of us share. It implies a failure of team work on both sides which would be greatly disturbing to both Carol and I were it true. The question of "How did we get so far apart?" would be more pressing to me than "Why is that damned bitch trying to manipulate me?" Topping from the bottom is another of those phrases that implies a two party system and we just have one team.

CrazyML said: "but sure - sometimes I do wonder "who is the Dominant in that relationship...?"
And that's exactly why it doesn't fit. I don't think either Carol or I is "dominant" in that sense. I frequently see us as a school of fish and the question I'd be having here is "What went wrong with the school such that she zigged and I zagged?" I don't think either of us actually cares who is "dominant" I think we both care a great deal that the school of fish stays together in a proper school.

_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 10:58:20 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt
There are many desktop doms or new doms or just not very good doms (take your pick) who *DO* call everything topping from the bottom, b/c they know subs don't want to do that, and they *DO* want to keep the sub down emotionally, stifle them, keep them from asking too many questions, keep their ego down, whatever, again take your pick. So I know this does exist.


Yup, the "you're not a REAL submissive" routine when a submissive refuses to cross a line or asks a question.


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 11:44:23 AM   
TNDommeK


Posts: 7153
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline
I think there is such a thing, I also think that depending on what is done about the situation is in the hands of the Dominant. if he/she chooses to notice depends also on the situation.

there might be times where the sub/slave might do things of that nature just to get attention from the Dominant, and I have seen that type of situation ignored.

some situations are very different, in the case of a baby girl sub, she may want vanilla ice cream instead of chocolate, so she may whine and cry about it. to Me that isnt topping from the bottom, even if she does get vanilla ice cream. I think that is the Daddy Dom rewarding (or whatever word you may use ) for what ever reason He chooses.

but there are definitely times I have seen straight up topping from the bottom, and I have wondered Myself...hmm who is the Dominant in that relationship.

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 12:24:34 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
I suppose that when M and I are watching TV and I tickle him to provoke a punch that this is TFTB, but we don't consider this a negative.

(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 12:36:49 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
Thank you, SR, for the well thought out response, I was hoping you'd see this new thread and pitch in.

You see, intellectually, I agree with you 100%. Nature abhors a vacuum, and most especially a power vacuum. If the dom lets the reins of control slip, and the sub picks them up, is it topping from the bottom? Some would say yes, some would say no.

I say relationships are untidy affairs that don't fit into the neat confines of an intellectual exercise. Even doms are just human, and letting the reins slip for a second doesn't make the person not a dom, it makes him/her flawed like the rest of us.

Again I will state that I don't see the issue as being so black and white as you do.

And I absolutely have to add, in all the examples you gave of someone saying you were topping from the bottom, I didn't see that at all. I saw the posturing of insecure asshole of a wannabe dom. Just saying.



_____________________________



(in reply to SpiritedRadiance)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 12:40:34 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

I think that manipulative behavior exists. I personally don't feel the need to label it with a special label just because it's a sub doing it to a dom but if you do that's fine. In that vein topping from the bottom exists.

I think importantly to me though, since this behavior is always ascribed to the sub, is the fact that in order for this manipulation to actually go anywhere the dom has to allow himself to be manipulated. It takes two to tango so in order for "topping from the bottom" to happen then "bottoming from the top" must also. I think I reflexively argue against it because the presentation is always so lopsided... it's the sub's fault. So I tend to point out that the dom also has some sort of responsibility not to abdicate his or her authority and deciding to be manipulated is absolutely abdication.

Also, and on an entirely personal note, this is another of those phrases that just wouldn't fit Carol and I. It implies an underlying viewpoint that neither of us share. It implies a failure of team work on both sides which would be greatly disturbing to both Carol and I were it true. The question of "How did we get so far apart?" would be more pressing to me than "Why is that damned bitch trying to manipulate me?" Topping from the bottom is another of those phrases that implies a two party system and we just have one team.

CrazyML said: "but sure - sometimes I do wonder "who is the Dominant in that relationship...?"
And that's exactly why it doesn't fit. I don't think either Carol or I is "dominant" in that sense. I frequently see us as a school of fish and the question I'd be having here is "What went wrong with the school such that she zigged and I zagged?" I don't think either of us actually cares who is "dominant" I think we both care a great deal that the school of fish stays together in a proper school.



Well stated, Jeff. Although our dynamics are so very different, we often see eye to eye on things.

_____________________________



(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 12:44:42 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
As SR said, it doesn't matter if I ask politely, whine, beg or demand, I still don't have the power to make him do what I want if he doesn't think he should do it.

Now that doesn't mean that he won't listen to what I say, realize he was missing some information, and change his mind based on the new information. It also doesn't mean that if I make him laugh, he won't then feel like indulging me. Or that he won't change his mind based on his judgment of my mood and what a no may do to me. And sometimes he changes a yes to a no, because he now believes that's what's best.

I can attempt to sway him, but that doesn't mean he has to be swayed. Although if I'm cute enough, I'm more likely to accomplish it. With him knowing all the time what I was doing and why he's agreed to it. But I could argue just as strongly the point that he is actually engaged in behavior modification by only being swayed when I act in a manner that he enjoys seeing. That he chooses to reward my behavior by giving me what I want. And if so, then who is manipulating whom?

But I cannot compel him to do anything that he decides shouldn't be done. All the rest of it is information. And being afraid of information doesn't make you a dominant, nor a person, worthy of respect IMO.



< Message edited by DesFIP -- 3/9/2012 12:49:44 PM >


_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 1:21:12 PM   
RaspberryLemon


Posts: 422
Joined: 7/18/2011
Status: offline
I think it is possible, but it is certainly a two-way street. Put simply, the submissive can certainly attempt to manipulate or undermine the dominant's authority. But whether or not it actually happens relies on how the dominant reacts to it--they have to let it happen. In other words, it can happen, but the fault lies on both parties, not just one or the other.

I communicate openly and clearly with my master, I don't manipulate (and if for some crazy reason I ever did, there is no way he would tolerate it.) And he has all the authority, so it is still all up to him to decide. He can choose freely whether or not that decision is the one favorable to me. I don't have the power to make him do what I want. That power always lies with him. I can tell him what I think and what I feel and what I want, and this may or may not influence his decision, but the decision was still his to make and I respect that.

I'd like to reiterate this point made by slaveluci, because she said it very well:
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveluci
quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
I partly agree and partly disagree with IrishMist on this.

I think it certainly does exist. I've seen bazillions of instances of what I'd describe as topping from the bottom. My definition isn't pejorative - to me topping from the bottom is simply the act of the sub controlling or influencing the scene. It's not necessarily bad, but sure - sometimes I do wonder "who is the Dominant in that relationship...?"

Interesting answer and I highlighted something that jumped out at me here. Going along with what I posted above, "controlling" and "influencing" are two very, very different actions to me. As I said, I can always ask Master for anything. I may or may not get it. The fact that I asked may "influence" His decision but it in NO WAY "controls" it. That, to me, is the crux of the whole "topping from the bottom" question. Him considering my request and perhaps even being influenced by my desires - while both of us are fully aware that He has the ultimate decision-making authority - is not at all the same as being "controlled" or "topped" by me into doing my will against His own..........luci

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 1:22:12 PM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I just got done reading another thread in which it was stated that topping from the bottom does not exist.

The premise is that a "real" dominant can't be topped from the bottom, that it was a term used to stifle and control the s-type.

I very much disagree with this statement. As a switch, I know both sides well. I am *very* aware that subs can and do manipulate dominants to get what they want/need. In fact, I would say most subs do this.

Of course, they are either smacked down (metaphorically speaking, or not) for this behavior, or it goes by unnoticed, or *and herein lies the issue to me* the dom notices it but does NOTHING.

Even my uber laid back dominant will say on occasion, "you know, you are getting a bit uppity there, girly," with that *ahem cough* stern voice.

In other words, he knows I am attempting to manipulate him, it's no big deal he's rather an immovable force, but he does let me know I've put a tippytoe across one of his lines in the sand.

So, what is your opinion on this issue?

Does topping from the bottom exist?

Why or why not?

And please, can we keep the discussion civil, tyvm.


Of course it exists but I don't think it's the negative demon too many make it out to be.

Everyone has real life issues that need to be dealt with and they can wear you down over time. And one of the ways I recognise that maybe I've been distracted and letting things slip is when my normally obedient girl starts getting a bit uppity or disrespectful etc. I don't see it as being overt manipulation by the s type but more a positive sign that she's a little lost for direction and stability - which comes back to me.

Her acting out this way isn't a struggle for power and control as I've yet to meet a submissive who wants it. What I see is a relationship reality check. But yeah, it's also a great tool for the wankers and wannabe's to manipulate the new and naive subs, too. But leave me out of the online, never met and probably never will bs where most of this tftb crap originates....

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 1:58:49 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

I think there is such a thing, I also think that depending on what is done about the situation is in the hands of the Dominant. if he/she chooses to notice depends also on the situation.

there might be times where the sub/slave might do things of that nature just to get attention from the Dominant, and I have seen that type of situation ignored.

some situations are very different, in the case of a baby girl sub, she may want vanilla ice cream instead of chocolate, so she may whine and cry about it. to Me that isnt topping from the bottom, even if she does get vanilla ice cream. I think that is the Daddy Dom rewarding (or whatever word you may use ) for what ever reason He chooses.

but there are definitely times I have seen straight up topping from the bottom, and I have wondered Myself...hmm who is the Dominant in that relationship.



I have seen it as well and thought the same thing. Can you share some examples with us?

_____________________________



(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 2:25:03 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
Again, I don't have such a black and white interpretation. But then I think my perceptions are different b/c I do have a dominant side and have had quite a few s-types.

I remember one male sub approached me about 10 years ago. He/she was a very accomplished CD, which I just adore. I had tons of fun dressing her and helping her with makeup and nails and hair and such. But she was a terrible brat, constantly challenging my authority. Disobeying to earn my attention gets you ignored. And if you keep doing it, it gets you let go.

I remember in parting, she said "You're not a real dominant if you can't control me." And I thought, well, you're not a real sub if you don't want to *be* controlled.

If I have to consistently force you to obey, then you're not very obedient, are you? And to me that is not submissive.

But my point with this is that although it is easy to say, "Well the dominant should always be in control." In reality, the dominant only has the control the sub is willing to give up. Full stop.(Unless it is a non consensual relationship.)



_____________________________



(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 3:14:05 PM   
LordOdinn


Posts: 34
Joined: 10/22/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt


As he said to me: If I don't respond, it doesn't mean I don't notice. And if I don't notice, why should I care?

BTW: I don't mean to be manipulative, or to top from the bottom, or anything else. But I am a switch, and I think we are more "toppy."



I,of course, have to agree.  You probably are more "toppy" than the subs in general are, which is clearly OK by me.  But then part of what I enjoy about you is your spiritedness. 


_____________________________

Chatte Wrangler Extraordinaire
I used to be LordOdhinn but I got the H out of there!!!


(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 5:32:36 PM   
TNDommeK


Posts: 7153
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline
in response to Chatte,

example that I have seen: when one calls themselves submitting to someone, but gives them instructions on what they need to do. example, a slave shouldnt be saying what she wants and doesnt want, what she approves of or what she doesnt. either a slave will trust and follow direction or she will not. what happens after is in the hands of the Dominant, but to Me that would be one example.

what are some examples you have seen?

_____________________________

Goddess of Duck Lips and Luxurious Hair
The working Fin Domme
Professional con artist, swindler, trixster, extortionist

Our snark-nado needs more cowbell


(in reply to LordOdinn)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 5:35:03 PM   
TNDommeK


Posts: 7153
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline
totally agree with what you thought. the want to be controlled plays a big part int he mental aspect of things :)




"I remember in parting, she said "You're not a real dominant if you can't control me." And I thought, well, you're not a real sub if you don't want to *be* controlled. "

_____________________________

Goddess of Duck Lips and Luxurious Hair
The working Fin Domme
Professional con artist, swindler, trixster, extortionist

Our snark-nado needs more cowbell


(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 5:44:53 PM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK
what she approves of or what she doesnt


I didn't give up my moral compass when I became his. He respects my moral views even if our moral views are not identical. If I didn't say what I approve of and what I don't he would have no way of knowing.

< Message edited by OsideGirl -- 3/9/2012 5:45:23 PM >


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 6:50:50 PM   
NiceButMeanGirl


Posts: 2756
Joined: 11/4/2011
From: Bellingham, WA U.S.A.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt
So, what is your opinion on this issue?

Does topping from the bottom exist?

Why or why not?

I do believe Topping from the bottom exists. Sometimes it's intentional and sometimes it's not. It's the bottom manipulating - or trying to manipulate - the Top into doing what s/he wants. That being said, I don't think it's fair that, every time a sub reacts to something, s/he gets accused of TFTB. I say that because my partner seems to think that reacting to something is TFTB and I don't. If someone says "sonofabitch" when s/he's hit too hard that's not TFTB in my opinion, but saying "Is that all you've got??" might be.

When it happens to me, I let him know that I know what he's doing and that he's not going to get away with it. If I just ignore it, he will think I don't notice and I don't want him to think that.

Also, I think sometimes it could just be a bad choice of when to bring something up. I always let any sub know that I am totally open to his input/ideas/wants and needs, but that the best time to discuss these things is NOT when we're in the middle of playing. I let him know that BEFOREHAND is a lot better time to talk these things out, rather than when we're already in the middle of something.

NBMG

_____________________________

I'm now SweetlySadistic1 on CollarSpace. NBMG is an old profile, please see my new one.


(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 9:08:04 PM   
LoreBook


Posts: 257
Joined: 2/22/2012
Status: offline
Its more of  a failing on the side of the Dominant than the submissive. It can't really happen unless the Dominant allows it to happen, so if it does; it is the Dominant's fault (or at least His/Her choice to allow it).

The preceding statement represents the views and opinions of the author and the author alone, and should in no way be considered an attempt by the author to define or determine anything for anybody but herself.


_____________________________

WITHOUT "ART" THE EARTH IS JUST "EH"



LLT

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/9/2012 9:27:54 PM   
mummyman321


Posts: 2102
Joined: 10/31/2005
From: Dusseldorf
Status: offline
Topping from the bottom certainly exists. Sometimes it happens because both in the relationship are fine and happy with it. Other times is happens because the bottom can be extremely clever. Many Dom(mes), but not all, are master manipulators. They understand the human psychology and use that against the sub. Well here is some news for you, there are subs out there that are also very clever and are master manipulators. Thus they Top from the Bottom!

_____________________________

Life - Its not about where you are but about the journey to get there - I prefer to choose the road less traveled

(in reply to LoreBook)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? - 3/10/2012 12:01:21 AM   
RaspberryLemon


Posts: 422
Joined: 7/18/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK
example, a slave shouldnt be saying what she wants and doesnt want, what she approves of or what she doesnt. either a slave will trust and follow direction or she will not.

Actually, in my opinion, of course she should say those things! Being submissive doesn't mean you have no desires or no moral compass. Nor does it mean you should disregard those things and stuff them away from the dominant, sweeping it all under the rug. These are things that are beneficial to be shared. How else does the dominant have full access to her mind if she does not share it with him? I've said it before and I'll say it again: my Master requires me to speak my mind at all times, so he may see what goes on in my head--he owns all of me, and that includes my thoughts, values, and wishes. I have no right to keep any of that from him. I give him all of me, all of the information so that he may decide what to do with it.

It's not about refusing to trust him and refusing to follow direction at all. I trust my Master with my life and I have no problem following his lead (in fact, I prefer it.) The fact that I speak my mind to him does not undermine that, it rather enhances it. Just another perspective on that. :)

(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Topping from the Bottom - Does it exist? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125