Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Ayn Rand and altruism


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Ayn Rand and altruism Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/16/2012 7:29:12 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve
It's fucking over man, if we get socialism it's because that's what capital wants, and whatever capital wants, capital gets, it's not even worth arguing about anymore.


Pretty much. I just wonder what's going to come out the other side, people being as unpredictable as we are.


_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 4:46:14 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

I've read a lot of Russian history. (Enough to know that Kafka was a Czech not a Russian, for a start. )
It's the main reason I find descriptions of the USSR as being "socialist" so offensive. It was no such thing. Not after the Bolsheviks cleared out all of the rival factions and started dictating the party line.

It wasn't just Russia, the 19th century bureaucracy all across Europe was a Byzantine morass, the precursor of the modern socialism, presumably they're managed to pare it down somewhat since then.

That's a bit of a generalisation. The bizarre Russian feudal bureaucracy run by landholders wasn't really used as a template for government outside of the countries that Russia had annexed (and they weren't exactly happy about it). There were plenty of rival government models being tried out across Europe at that time, particularly as France had got rid of its own nobility a century previously and Bismark had his own notions about how Prussia (and most of the rest of Europe) should be run...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 4:55:19 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

Any of those strike you as potentially worth stepping down to an EU standard of living?



Actually, yes, now you come to mention them.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 6:12:14 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
Well going by the novelists of the time, particularly Kafka, but also Von Mises, etc., there seems to have been a substantial jaundice towards 19th century European bureaucracy which is more evidently ubiquitous than it is at the same time in America, where urban police forces were just beginning to evolve due to population expansion, and bureaucratic meddling elsewhere was mostly confined to Indian Affairs - there;s no question that bureaucracy highly unilateral and deeply corrupt.

But Kafka wasn't alone, Lord Jim is sort of an essay on bureaucratic standards, while Heart of Darkness is a horror story about a bureaucrat "going native", and at the same time bureaucracy in praxis was the subject of criticism, there is at the same time a sort of debate going on about order vs. chaos w/regard to the subject of bureaucratic standards.

In China, Confucius tackled the subject of bureaucracy early on, after noting that while rulers came and went, the bureaucracy remained eternal, and Confucianism itself is not so much a religion as a set of bureaucratic ethical standards and practices.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 6:27:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Confucius was the anathema of the Laozi Lao Tzu school.  There have been endless fights about that.

The common thought in China promulgated by Confucius was that of a balance of deprivation (always wanting made one dumb and happy) and everybody getting a grain of the available bowl of rice (a factory worker paradigm).  The believed that the excesses led to fat and inertia.

Regarding the others, it seems that the bitch was external, rather than internal, and they were concerned with the bureacracy of colonialism and hegemony.  They just weren't all that introspective regarding their own government, just their neigbors.        

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 6:30:02 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve
It's fucking over man, if we get socialism it's because that's what capital wants, and whatever capital wants, capital gets, it's not even worth arguing about anymore.


Pretty much. I just wonder what's going to come out the other side, people being as unpredictable as we are.


Well its worth noting that many of those Polynesian societies, ended up relatively aristocratic, and the ones that weren't rapidly converted after contact with Western Civilization, avarice it seems, is pretty predictable. Ironically, a lot of the islands, many of them quite tiny, now have banking economies, and operate as tax havens.

I think the problem with that, from a social psychology standpoint, is it's association/correlation with centripetal defensive strategies, to put it bluntly it involves strategy and often results in single minded, and highly organized behaviors, whereas acentrism, by definition tends to be uncoordinated, and is usually reduced to criticizing random ill effects (corruption, historically, outsourcing and capital flight, more recently), rather than addressing he phenomena as a whole.

Thing is, like I said, everything everybody does in a society, affects everybody else in a collective manner, and thus is to some extent, everybody's business, whereas the counter to that is yelling every man for himself when it comes to profits but expecting protection from the collective if those profits are threatened.

The bureaucratic problem is simply a problem with institutions in general: institutions, first and foremost seek to perpetuate and expand themselves just like organisms - it's human nature to seek a cozy spot and nest; that's what we do, and once ensconced, we resist any attempt to dislodge us. That was much of the rationale behind supply side economics to begins with, i.e., getting rid of the layers of middle management that had accumulated in postwar firms (middle management is the bureaucracy of the private sector), as they were suspected to be the cause of the stagnant production side of stagflation.

Thus, the LBO's and "restructuring" of the Eighties that systematically destroyed and sold off most of our industrial base - any productivity increases were mostly the result of cheap labor and almost non existent regulation in the Pacific rim.

The economic results in macrocosm have been steadily increasing profits, steadily declining wages and saving rates, and increasing reliance on debt, public and private, coupled with a negative current accounts balance is not historically associated with desirable economic outcomes.

< Message edited by xssve -- 4/17/2012 6:39:38 AM >


_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 6:33:42 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve
But Kafka wasn't alone, Lord Jim is sort of an essay on bureaucratic standards, while Heart of Darkness is a horror story about a bureaucrat "going native", and at the same time bureaucracy in praxis was the subject of criticism, there is at the same time a sort of debate going on about order vs. chaos w/regard to the subject of bureaucratic standards.

Colonial bureaucracy tended to be rather different to domestic governmental bureaucracy, though. It's a bit of a stretch to compare the migration of a social class of landlords into administrative sinecures to the scoundrels of empire. Hell, the foreign office and colonial office were one of the few ways that a smart prole could be allowed a whiff of social mobility in Victorian Britain, weren't they?
As for Heart Of Darkness, Kurtz was employed by a trading company (copper mining, iirc), rather than any branch of government administration.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 6:48:52 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
Managers are the bureaucrats of the private sector. As for social mobility, yes, but see the paragraph on bureaucracies above.

Point is, there is evidence of a love hate relationship with bureaucracy in the Colonial era, on the one hand, I think people like the idea of standards, and on the other, those standards are often ad hoc and often represent interests other than the demographic being regulated.

In the middle ages, the bureaucracy was represented largely by the private armies of rulers and aristocrats, often in collusion with the Church, and has retained very few positive associations, it was a largely predatory economic model that actively and bloodily suppressed any attempt at change, reform, or even minor deviation.

It's worth noting these patterns, history, as they say, having a tendency to repeat itself, since, as they also say, some things never change.

i.e, in Russia, the Czar and the aristocracy was overthrown by a people sick of their abuses, but they were replaced with a regime that was just as abusive, and in mostly the same manner.

< Message edited by xssve -- 4/17/2012 6:49:29 AM >


_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 6:59:41 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
No question of the latter. The really annoying thing is the way a real opportunity for positive change was pissed away by idiots.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 7:02:07 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
I think the relationship between standardization and productivity is probably an area that needs to be examined - standards increase safety and mitigate abuses, but at the same time, they are often a drug on innovation and productivity - i.e., you aren't likely to get shift to renewables, PV panels etc., in a neighborhood governed by covenants, and neighborhood associations are simply highly localized bureaucracies, who's major obsessions are aesthetic with an eye to property values.

And if you've ever dealt with public or private bureaucracy, you must eventually observe that the primary goal of the bureaucrat is to cover their own asses, and at least half the regulation they issue are directed specifically towards that goal.

It's not real surprising then that bureaucratic goals in America are largely directed towards profit protection, since after CYA, nothing will get you fired faster than losing money (for management or stockholders), whereas wreaking social mayhem in the process is justifiable in pursuit of those profits.

Then, a public bureaucracy that uses services rather than profit as a yardstick, is going to come under even heavier criticism, due to the fact that they are almost invariable going to conflict with new levels of profitability enabled by ignoring even basic human rights, i.e., the unrealistic and unsustainable levels of profit the private sector has become accustomed to, that has become glaring when corporate profits are at all time highs at the same time half the country is out of work and unable to obtain healthcare - that should not be happening if the labor market were competitive, and business properly regulated w/respect to standards of service rather than standards of profitability.

It ain't "trickling down", clearly - seems to be gushing upwards, and the pool is about dry.

< Message edited by xssve -- 4/17/2012 7:07:53 AM >


_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 8:12:36 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

No question of the latter. The really annoying thing is the way a real opportunity for positive change was pissed away by idiots.


That is their altruistic view of the world, their rugged individualism that is tied to every individual being exactly the same as they are collectively, or to serve their vision, the one of the past centuries, by entering into a symbiotic relationship where they take and the unwashed give, to further no change.

In this country we call them teabaggers and neo-cons, capitulists, servile appeasers to corporations.

You call them Chamberlains.
Norway calls them Quislings.

And so on.... 


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 3:32:01 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Confucius was the anathema of the Laozi Lao Tzu school.  There have been endless fights about that.

The common thought in China promulgated by Confucius was that of a balance of deprivation (always wanting made one dumb and happy) and everybody getting a grain of the available bowl of rice (a factory worker paradigm).  The believed that the excesses led to fat and inertia.

Regarding the others, it seems that the bitch was external, rather than internal, and they were concerned with the bureacracy of colonialism and hegemony.  They just weren't all that introspective regarding their own government, just their neigbors.        

Yeah, I''m not really an expert on it, but among other things, I believe Confucianism puts a lot of stress on education, and Asians have a reputation for a drive towards scholastic achievement - to the point of neurosis even - some of them have been known to commit suicide over a failed test.

Kinda like cultural Jewish Mother, lol, while in the West we sort of have the opposite view, intelligence = pencil neck geek, nerds, etc. The whole Greek esthetic of the scholar-athlete, while it gets resurrected form time to time, isn't really applied consistently, Kennedy was the last one to have any success with it, and Dukakis's portrayal as a wonk didn't do him any good in the '88 election, even though we could have used a policy wonk at the time.

In the medieval aristocracy, literacy was often taken as a sign of effeminacy, and up until the Eighties, it was roughly the same thing with executives and computers - in fact I think it was probably Gordon Gecko with all the monitors on his desk in Wall Street that sort of broke that taboo - before that the well equipped exec was one with a full bar in his office, and box of Cohibas on the desk.

Clearly there is a more secular obsession with "manliness", i.e., a disdain of being "gay" as opposed to homosexual, i.e., "gay" = "weak", a weak man is likened to a homosexual who is likened to a woman.

In any case, w/regard to bureaucracy, in a paperwork driven culture like this one, bureaucracies generate a great deal of paperwork, perhaps because the more paperwork you generate, the more productive you look (and of course, CYA), and it was one of the major complaints that increased demands for deregulation - armies of public bureaucrats generating oceans of paperwork necessitate armies of middle management bureaucrats to deal with it, on the one hand, it increases employment, on the other, it diminishes profits.

The GDP however, grew a great deal faster before the regulatory state was dismantled and taxes were higher, go figure. It grew faster in both the Seventies and the Nineties than it did in the Eighties.

The Bush administration negated all predatory lending laws at the state level by fiat rather than through legislative processes (though the office of the comptroller of the currency) because mortgage mills were complaining about having to navigate among a wide variety of varying state law.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 3:51:07 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
well, education in ritual and procedure, otherwise not so much.


The rest is worlds of comments but I havent the will to proceed upon it.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/17/2012 9:28:25 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Altruism is defined as "disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others" by the Oxford Dictionary. Many of us would, I suspect, feel altruism has a positive meaning - it is a quality that we admire in people, it is something we see as desirable. Some would even go so far as to suggest that altruism is a basic force for good inherent in human nature, found at the heart of human civilisation and culture.

The author Ayn Rand takes a very different view:
"Altruism is a moral system which holds that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the sole justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, value and virtue. Altruism is the moral base of collectivism, of all dictatorships...Altruism is the poison of death in the blood of Western civilization. ".- Ayn Rand, Interview in Playboy Magazine, 196

Is altruism a force for good or " poison of death in the blood of Western civilization', or perhaps something else? Is it relevant or obsolete in today's world? What do you think?


Ayn Rand was a disinterested (something or other).

Ayn Rand wasn't anything special...indeed...she was...disinterested.

(And Hon....I'm about as interested in her thesis as any Republican but.....she was SADLY misinformed).

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/18/2012 4:16:56 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve
Yeah, I''m not really an expert on it, but among other things, I believe Confucianism puts a lot of stress on education, and Asians have a reputation for a drive towards scholastic achievement - to the point of neurosis even - some of them have been known to commit suicide over a failed test.

That one is more Japan than China, and Confuscianism has never been a very bid deal there, no matter how much of their culture is derived from Chinese models.

< Message edited by Moonhead -- 4/18/2012 4:17:23 AM >


_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/18/2012 3:53:01 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Actually, yes, now you come to mention them.


Good to hear. I thought those were sort of implied by the whole "Animal Farm meets Dilbert's Boss" thing.

I may have an appreciation for feet, but not for living under the heel of one.

Health,
al-Aswad.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/18/2012 4:28:59 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Actually, yes, now you come to mention them.


Good to hear. I thought those were sort of implied by the whole "Animal Farm meets Dilbert's Boss" thing.

I may have an appreciation for feet, but not for living under the heel of one.

Health,
al-Aswad.




OK.

I'm not sure if you know of the tale of the Three Billy Goats Gruff, Aswad? I think it was from this tale - fable - that the proverb 'the grass is always greener the other side' derives. But I think that it's a Norwegian folk tale, anyway.

I'm just suggesting that it might not be a major problem to put up with, say, having to apply to some bureaucrat to change your doorknob, so long as that you're living pretty comfortably and are fairly certain you're not going to get shot and killed (OK, leave Breitvic out of this, for the sake of argument).

Norwegian society is as strange to me as is American society, only at polar opposites to each other. It's quite hard for me to get to grips with either, to be honest, at times.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/18/2012 7:18:03 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

But I think that it's a Norwegian folk tale, anyway.


I'm familiar with it.

quote:

I'm just suggesting that it might not be a major problem to put up with, say, having to apply to some bureaucrat to change your doorknob, so long as that you're living pretty comfortably and are fairly certain you're not going to get shot and killed (OK, leave Breitvic out of this, for the sake of argument).


How about I include him explicitly instead, by pointing out that what he did was motivated by a less realistic perception of a set of issues I have been pointing at for over a decade? Or that his attacks were successful due to other issues I have been alerting people, including politicians, to for about as long? Or that the people he targetted were the virtually hereditary successors to the entrenched power "aristocracy" class here, several of which assumed they were the only other target in Norway one might attack than the houses of government simply because they are the legitimate heirs to power?

I get what you're saying, and if all one cares about is food and shelter, then Norway is perfect. Period.

I just happen to think that more or less the only thing legitimizing our existence as a species is that we're capable of more. Because everything else about us as a whole is pathological to the only biosphere we know of in this universe, which science and religion both claim to be pretty unique as universes go in supporting the possibility of even a single biosphere occuring. That one in an ultrillion glimmer of life in a vast void of nothing, we're wiping our asses with it. I'm inclined to say that can only stand if we either discard morality, or truly adopt it. Meaning that we put it ahead of those things that do not make us unique, and which thus cannot serve to- in part or in whole- justify being this plague on the world.

Norway is no good at that.

So long as the wheels are turning for a majority of the population, we're good little rats, and live like it.

quote:

Norwegian society is as strange to me as is American society, only at polar opposites to each other. It's quite hard for me to get to grips with either, to be honest, at times.


They're not exactly polar opposites, but there are significant differences, yes.

For instance, the American system is built on distrust of the consequences of putting too much power in too few hands, whereas the Norwegian system is built on an implicit trust of any entity above person level that has power and behaves like a disinterested but dutiful parent. Indeed, as a sometimes teacher of self defense classes at one point, I quickly lost interest because people were almost universally of the opinion that it was borderline criminal to be prepared to defend oneself, seeing as only the police are supposed to wield power, not victims of crimes, etc. (We hate any individual with power or wealth, unless they hide it. Sociopaths are okay, though.)

I seem to recall you're one of those that had an idea of the Gorean ethos. I once tried to explain it to some Norwegian kinksters. They were fine with the parts that usually raise eyebrows. But a majority had a meltdown over the parts that most usually like, such as individual accountability, responsibility, meritocracy, and so forth. After all, the state gives you the playpen and makes sure there's nothing in it you shouldn't play with, and then you play until they tell you to go to bed. The State forbid you even think about bringing power dynamics into your life, unless it's your sex life (we like sex, another difference, lol).

There's about a third of the population here that feel the other way around, and the use of a sort of winner takes all parliamentary system makes sure they have remained an essentially oppressed minority since the Nazis put the current government into power. One of those, and not the only one out there I know of with such violent sentiments, was ABB. He killed about 70 people and seriously injured 500 on the 22th of July, most of them teenagers. And according to his defense speech at the trial, he did it to start polarizing our society in the hopes of making it impossible for the two majority groups of our population to coexist.

When I read his defense statements, I thought he had swiped my posts analyzing him, but the wiki article indicates he doesn't have Internet access, so apparently I just guessed essentially everything about the guy before I knew who he was, most of it while the authorities were still operating under the assumption of an Islamic terrorist cell attacking. Which is disturbing, as I actually thought for a while that I had given him too much credit. Instead, as far as I can tell, there's a good chance he's already won, while we're patting ourselves on the back for making him lose a battle he wasn't fighting in the first place.

Oh, to have been in range with a decently scoped rifle that day, eh?

Anyway, long story long, we have material comfort. And most people here aren't getting shot, aren't getting raped, and aren't living. The former two are changing with a demographic shift, of course, particularly the raping part, but in general the country has made a decent pass at the whole "shoving oil into every crevice to keep the wheels turning" thing. And we're a slow, docile and complacent bunch, so it's all fine to "all" of us so long as the wheels are turning.

We do not, however, have anything but oil.

I mean, c'mon... what country with anything resembling a single good intention between the lot of them can fail to provide livable conditions for its citizens when there's literally millions of dollars per capita surplus from the oil, four homogenous populations that don't hate each other, no disputes near the home soil, good international relations, and no domestic or foreign debt?

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: Ayn Rand and altruism - 4/18/2012 8:22:38 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Yeah and definitions change over the ions

Especially those damn Zwitterions.
quote:

The tendency to attach stalin and Moe with the word...

Shemp was waaay better than Little Joe... and Larry always gets the fuzzy end of the lollipop.

< Message edited by Hippiekinkster -- 4/18/2012 8:27:09 PM >

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 159
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Ayn Rand and altruism Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.107