Bhruic -> RE: ?? Daddy Dom's (4/18/2012 8:42:50 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote:
ORIGINAL: Bhruic Certainly it is a public board, and anyone can respond to posts in any way they wish. Actually, there's more going on than that, Bhruic. If you read the Guidelines for posting in this forum, which is at the top of the General BDSM Discussion topic list, you will see it includes: quote:
Subjects which are unacceptable regardless of circumstance include, but are not limited to - minors engaged in sexual activities, bestiality, incest, necrophilia, snuff and criminal activities. Any other questions of acceptability will be determined based on the content of the given essay. Keep the discussions civil and mature, and do not insult the kinks, preferences, lifestyles, etc. of others. frazzle's posts were not consistent with forum guidelines. Not only was she insulting a kink, she was saying that the people engaging in it were engaging in an illegal behavior that can't be discussed here. (Actually, the mods have clarified over the years that it's ok to discuss, say, pedophilia, in theory and in the abstract -- like, percentage of pedophilia in different races, cultures, countries -- but it's not ok to talk about actively doing it.) I'm not an official spokesperson by any means, but I thought that was why 21 posted in the thread. I agree that dissing someone's kink is in opposition to the TOS... but discussing whether something is or is not incest is not the same thing as discussing incest. Nothing in this thread has anything to do with incest, which is, in fact, sex between direct family members. NOT pretend family members (if that's one's kink) ... seems like the thread kinda lost track of that important nuance.
|
|
|
|