kalikshama
Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
The message you're sending is that free speech stops at misogynistic remarks. Please refer back to http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4099385 For instance, neither the basic principle of freedom of speech nor the First Amendment says the following: - you have the right to be heard (you have the right to speak, but nobody has an obligation to listen – the right to hear or not to hear is the unwritten right upon which it’s all based) - you have the right not to be disagreed with (nope, just the opposite – freedom to speak exposes you to other people’s right to speak and subjects you to the judgment of the community) - other people have an obligation to provide you a forum in which to speak (nope – you have a right to speak, but you have no right to speak in my yard) - others have an obligation to sponsor or finance your speech (no – choosing to advertise or otherwise patronize your speech is a function of the other party’s freedom and they have the right to turn the faucet on and off as they wish and for whatever reasons they wish) - you have a right to be free from the consequences of your speech (no – if you offend the community, they have the right to end their association with you; they have the right to speak freely to your sponsors, if you have any, and to ask said sponsor to cease supporting you) - you have the right to be opposed only by those whose values mirror yours (duh, no – people have the right to oppose you for the noblest of reasons or the most despicable; if they opt for the latter, then they become subject to the rights of others within the community to speak and act against them)
|