IrishMist
Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt Yes, is is kinda limited how you answered. Please take time to think about it and give us your perspective, w/o feeling the need to "answer questions." If you can, and TY. Hmm...Ok lol. I stated, that in my eyes, mental domination and internal enslavement go hand in hand. I can't see one being present without the other. Mental domination was his ability to totally, and completely control every aspect of my personality and life. Internal enslavement was my response to that. I completely gave myself over to him, to the point that yes, I would have placed my life in danger if he had asked me to. It gave me a structure to my life that I needed very badly at that time; and it was something that took me a long time to recover from when he passed away. For me, I saw this as a perfectly normal part of our lives. I saw the same in other couples that we knew in real life. It was not until after his death that I came to realize that, for most people, this type of relationship was not the norm. As for personality types...no, I don't see this as something that comes easier to certain people. Look at me for instance. I am not submissive; yet, I thrived under this kind of control...even if I often pushed his buttons just for the hell of it. It has been my experience with others, that those who look for and thrive under this type of relationship; have all different types of personalities. Yes, a person can go too far with this; and more often than not, they do. I believe though, that those are the ones that really have no idea of what they are asking for, or doing. It takes a hell of a lot of responsibility to take control of someone under these circumstances; you literally hold their life in your hands ( and I am not referring to 'play', I am referring to a person's life, literally ) Loss of automony. No, I never lost my automony ( and by this I refer to my own will ). I always had the choice to stay or go, to do or not do, etc etc. I often acted on not doing lol . I never WANTED to leave him though. It was a choice to stay. And no, I don't believe that all s-types lose their autonomy. Some do, some don't. As for it being the point. I believe that yes, most dominants want this lose of autonomy. I think they have this idea that if a submissive or slave does not lose their autonomy; then it means that they don't trust them. So, they work towards this. Myself...even though I have not been in a relationship since he passed away, I know for a fact that I could not settle for less than the same again. It's the structure that goes with this that is the most beneficial to me.
_____________________________
If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.
|