quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

ROFL... Vulnerable men being taken advantage of???? So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want? Helpless, vulnerable men...

That just makes no sense at all!

It's more like men helping themselves to what they want and being willing to fork over some dough for it. Stop blaming the women... if there were no customer base, the women wouldn't be doing it.

Vulnerable men... now that is just funny!

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

I was just thinking: if everyone is in agreement (as it appears) with the propositions that a) there's nothing wrong with being a prostitute and b) there's nothing wrong with giving sexual favours (howsoever defined) in return for money - then why, exactly, are people arguing about the matter?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twenty9male

I think men are the victims when it comes to sex, all the money it costs, yet no one to stand up for them. If there were no worker base there would be no customers

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissAsylum

sex worker is the correct term. such as strippers who get naked for money (and the good ones at least) don't do sex on the side.

yes, i work in the sex industry, and i have no qualms about it. so do people who sell sex toys, but i guess they aren't prostitutes- despite the fact that they give indirect pleasure for money.

i don't spread my legs, widen my hand, or open my mouth for anybody other than my partner.

and since you need a refresher on what prostitution is:

"Prostitution consists of knowingly engaging in or offering to engage in a sexual act for hire. As used in this section "sexual act" means sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, masturbation of another, anal intercourse or the causing of penetration to any extent and with any object of the genital or anal opening of another, whether or not there is any emission. Whoever commits prostitution is guilty of a petty misdemeanor, unless such crime is a second or subsequent conviction, in which case such person is guilty of a misdemeanor."

http://definitions.uslegal.com/p/prostitution/

I do none of that.

Right. "Knowingly engaging in or offering to engage in a sexual act for hire." That's what you do. I need no refresher course. Often it will involve intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio or masturbation, but even if it doesn't, the common understanding of prostitution is that it is sex for money. People engaging in it, very commonly, try to find technicalities to say it's not prostitution. And those may work with the courts who are constricted by the literal definition of the law. But they don't work with common sense among common people. Everybody sees what it is: sex for money. End of story.

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

ROFL... Vulnerable men being taken advantage of???? So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want? Helpless, vulnerable men...

That just makes no sense at all!

It's more like men helping themselves to what they want and being willing to fork over some dough for it. Stop blaming the women... if there were no customer base, the women wouldn't be doing it.

Vulnerable men... now that is just funny!

Obviously, you haven't read what I wrote.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

ROFL... Vulnerable men being taken advantage of???? So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want? Helpless, vulnerable men...

That just makes no sense at all!

It's more like men helping themselves to what they want and being willing to fork over some dough for it. Stop blaming the women... if there were no customer base, the women wouldn't be doing it.

Vulnerable men... now that is just funny!

Obviously, you haven't read what I wrote.

Obviously, you didn't get what I wrote.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissAsylum

I just like seeing the ill informed dance.

and i do believe I saw your luscious abs in my "users who have recently search for your profile" section.

i knew you couldn't resist me. lol

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

I was just thinking: if everyone is in agreement (as it appears) with the propositions that a) there's nothing wrong with being a prostitute and b) there's nothing wrong with giving sexual favours (howsoever defined) in return for money - then why, exactly, are people arguing about the matter?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

ROFL... Vulnerable men being taken advantage of???? So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want? Helpless, vulnerable men...

That just makes no sense at all!

It's more like men helping themselves to what they want and being willing to fork over some dough for it. Stop blaming the women... if there were no customer base, the women wouldn't be doing it.

Vulnerable men... now that is just funny!

Obviously, you haven't read what I wrote.

Obviously, you didn't get what I wrote.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissAsylum

I just like seeing the ill informed dance.

and i do believe I saw your luscious abs in my "users who have recently search for your profile" section.

i knew you couldn't resist me. lol

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

I was just thinking: if everyone is in agreement (as it appears) with the propositions that a) there's nothing wrong with being a prostitute and b) there's nothing wrong with giving sexual favours (howsoever defined) in return for money - then why, exactly, are people arguing about the matter?

*Sigh*, Well, I'll stand by my words.

It seems to me that what these debates boil down to - aside from legal matters, that is - is a covert disparaging of prostitution, no matter what each side says. One side wants to defend against the insult, the other wants the first to own the insult.

Do people really, really believe that there's nothing wrong with prostitution? I mean, have they hoovered every last vestige of that old Victorian morality out of their systems?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

dink22, what are you on? I wasn't even responding to you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissAsylum

I just like seeing the ill informed dance.

and i do believe I saw your luscious abs in my "users who have recently search for your profile" section.

i knew you couldn't resist me. lol

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

I was just thinking: if everyone is in agreement (as it appears) with the propositions that a) there's nothing wrong with being a prostitute and b) there's nothing wrong with giving sexual favours (howsoever defined) in return for money - then why, exactly, are people arguing about the matter?

*Sigh*, Well, I'll stand by my words.

It seems to me that what these debates boil down to - aside from legal matters, that is - is a covert disparaging of prostitution, no matter what each side says. One side wants to defend against the insult, the other wants the first to own the insult.

Do people really, really believe that there's nothing wrong with prostitution? I mean, have they hoovered every last vestige of that old Victorian morality out of their systems?

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

dink22, what are you on? I wasn't even responding to you.

You're right. I apologize.

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22
I actually don't find any problem with prostitution --AT ALL-- as long as it is understood as such. I think it should be legal. It just bothers me when a supposedly "dominant" woman is "looking" for someone, then money comes into the picture. Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real?

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22
Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real?

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22
Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real?

Do you even have a clue of how many Dominant females on this thread do not engage in pro sessions, financial, or any of the other stuff that you are railing about?

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22
Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real?

Do you even have a clue of how many Dominant females on this thread do not engage in pro sessions, financial, or any of the other stuff that you are railing about?

Actually, you're quite right. There ARE dominant females here. REAL ones, who want a REAL relationship and/or live the lifestyle for real. And I see my original comments, while driven by my experience, may have had the tendency to paint ALL supposed "dominant females" with the same brush, which was kind of insulting. I assure you that was not my intention, LadyPact.

If what I said was offensive to either you, or Lockit, who I know are the real deal, I am sorry.