thompsonx
Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MileHighM quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus quote:
ORIGINAL: MileHighM To the issue of the disabled, are we ever going to make a distinction as to self-inflicted disability (drug addiction, spoon in mouth sydrome, etc) vs. fate disability (autism, getting hit by a drunk, muscular dystrophy, etc)? What do you mean by spoon in mouth syndrome? Is that a dig against fat people? I'm not sure that we can make those kinds of judgments, really, because how many lines can be drawn? I don't like drug addicts, so they can die in the street, but drunks are okay, even though they both got strokes because of their predilictions? What about FAS babies, do we hate them and deny them care because their parents caused their ailment? Well, yes it is...The sheer number of obese in this country is not due to some weird disease floating around making people gain weight it is due to people putting more calories in their mouth than they burn off. I am 6'4" and I was 285--look it up, obese. I started having some health problems, I didn't start making excuses, and claiming it was a disability that I like to eat (food addiction). I got my ass in shape, modified my dietary portions and lost 50lbs. I also smoked, quit that too, despite my addiction. My point is some are disabled because they choose to be. I don't care if eventually got addicted to something, they chose to take it to that level. I don't think you should be given priviledged status in society as a disabled person if you purposely inflicted yourself with that disability. Because of the ADA, people do get certain priviledges like being protected from termination from their job, I don't think you should get that level of protection if you are the sole reason behind that disability. As for the children, the parents caused it not them. Hence, not a self-inflicted disability. Your success must be because you are so much smarter than your peers. Have you a clue to how pretensious your post is?
|